Literature DB >> 28286315

Formulation of hydrophobic peptides for skin delivery via coated microneedles.

Xin Zhao1, Sion A Coulman2, Stephanie J Hanna3, F Susan Wong3, Colin M Dayan3, James C Birchall4.   

Abstract

Microneedles (MNs) have been investigated as a minimally-invasive delivery technology for a range of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). Various formulations and methods for coating the surface of MNs with therapeutics have been proposed and exemplified, predominantly for hydrophilic drugs and particulates. The development of effective MN delivery formulations for hydrophobic drugs is more challenging with dosing restrictions and the use of organic solvents impacting on both the bioactivity and the kinetics of drug release. In this study we propose a novel formulation that is suitable for MN coating of hydrophobic auto-antigen peptides currently being investigated for antigen specific immunotherapy (ASI) of type 1 diabetes. The formulation, comprising three co-solvents (water, 2-methyl-2-butanol and acetic acid) and polyvinylalcohol 2000 (PVA2000) can dissolve both hydrophilic and hydrophobic peptide auto-antigens at relatively high, and clinically relevant, concentrations (25mg/ml or 12.5mg/ml). The drug:excipient ratio is restricted to 10:1 w/w to maximise dose whilst ensuring that the dry-coated payload does not significantly impact on MN skin penetration performance. The coating formulation and process does not adversely affect the biological activity of the peptide. The delivery efficiency of the coated peptide into skin is influenced by a number of parameters. Electropolishing the metal MN surface increases delivery efficiency from 2.0±1.0% to 59.9±6.7%. An increased mass of peptide formulation per needle, from 0.37μg to 2μg peptide dose, resulted in a thicker coating and a 20% reduction in the efficiency of skin delivery. Other important performance parameters for coated MNs include the role of excipients in assisting dissolution from the MNs, the intrinsic hydrophobicity of the peptide and the species of skin model used in laboratory studies. This study therefore both exemplifies the potential of a novel formulation for coating hydrophobic and hydrophilic peptides onto MN devices and provides new insight into the factors that influence delivery efficiency from coated MNs. Importantly, the results provide guidance for identifying critical attributes of the formulation, coating process and delivery device, that confer reproducible and effective delivery from coated MNs, and thus contribute to the requirements of the regulators appraising these devices.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coating; Formulation; Hydrophobic; Microneedle; Peptide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28286315     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  11 in total

Review 1.  Microneedle Coating Methods: A Review with a Perspective.

Authors:  Rohan S J Ingrole; Harvinder Singh Gill
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Efficacy of a bleomycin microneedle patch for the treatment of warts.

Authors:  Ha Ryeong Ryu; Hye-Rin Jeong; Hye-Seung Seon-Woo; Jung Soo Kim; Seul Ki Lee; Hee Joo Kim; Jin Ok Baek; Jung-Hwan Park; Joo Young Roh
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 3.  A comprehensive review on possibilities of treating psoriasis using dermal cyclosporine.

Authors:  Sonia Pandey; Purnima Tripathi; Arti Gupta; Jitendra Singh Yadav
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 4.  Advances in microneedle-based transdermal delivery for drugs and peptides.

Authors:  Krishanu Aich; Tanya Singh; Shweta Dang
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Low-Temperature Multiple Micro-Dispensing on Microneedles for Accurate Transcutaneous Smallpox Vaccination.

Authors:  Sang-Gu Yim; Yun-Ho Hwang; Seonyeong An; Keum-Yong Seong; Seo-Yeon Kim; Semin Kim; Hyeseon Lee; Kang-Oh Lee; Mi-Young Kim; Dokeun Kim; You-Jin Kim; Seung-Yun Yang
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 6.  Design and development of insulin microneedles for diabetes treatment.

Authors:  Qida Zong; Ranran Guo; Naijun Dong; Guixia Ling; Peng Zhang
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 7.  Emerging Novel Approaches for the Enhanced Delivery of Natural Products for the Management of Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Akshay Bandiwadekar; Jobin Jose; Maryam Khayatkashani; Solomon Habtemariam; Hamid Reza Khayat Kashani; Seyed Mohammad Nabavi
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.444

Review 8.  Microneedle Mediated Transdermal Delivery of Protein, Peptide and Antibody Based Therapeutics: Current Status and Future Considerations.

Authors:  Melissa Kirkby; Aaron R J Hutton; Ryan F Donnelly
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Microneedle System for Transdermal Drug and Vaccine Delivery: Devices, Safety, and Prospects.

Authors:  Xiaoxiang He; Jingyao Sun; Jian Zhuang; Hong Xu; Ying Liu; Daming Wu
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 10.  3D Printing-A "Touch-Button" Approach to Manufacture Microneedles for Transdermal Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Merima Sirbubalo; Amina Tucak; Kenan Muhamedagic; Lamija Hindija; Ognjenka Rahić; Jasmina Hadžiabdić; Ahmet Cekic; Derzija Begic-Hajdarevic; Maida Cohodar Husic; Almir Dervišević; Edina Vranić
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.