Literature DB >> 31662541

Cephalic Vein Cut-down for Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices With Preoperative Ultrasonography by Surgical Residents.

Shintaro Hashimoto1,2, Ryota Otsubo3, Masahiro Adachi1, Ryoichiro Doi1, Kenichiro Shibata1, Isao Sano1, Yoshihito Shibata1, Takayuki Nakazaki1, Hideki Taniguchi1, Takeshi Nagayasu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cephalic vein (CV) cut-down for totally implantable central venous access devices (TICVADs) is not frequently used due to its low success rate. We compared the outcomes of CV cut-down using preoperative ultrasonography (US) performed by experienced surgeons versus surgical residents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 2015 to December 2017, 10 surgeons implanted 212 TICVADs using CV cut-down with preoperative US. The surgeons were divided into two groups of five each: surgical residents (Group A, n=124 procedures) and experienced surgeons (Group B, n=88 procedures). Duration of operation time, completion rate, and complications were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: The completion rate was significantly higher in Group A (98.4% versus 92.0%, p=0.04). Duration of operation time (45.2±14.5 versus 42.0±13.1 minutes, p=0.22), rates of early complications (1.6% versus 1.1%, p=0.77) and late complications (3.2% versus 2.3%, p=0.68) were equivalent between the two groups. No fatal complications occurred in either group.
CONCLUSION: CV cut-down can be safely performed by surgical residents under the use of preoperative US. Copyright
© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CV cut-down; cephalic vein; surgical education; totally implantable central venous access device; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31662541      PMCID: PMC6899108          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  20 in total

1.  Migration of central lines from the superior vena cava to the azygous vein.

Authors:  T M Haygood; K Malhotra; C Ng; B Chasen; K W McEnery; M Chasen
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Evaluation of totally implantable central venous access devices with the cephalic vein cut-down approach: Usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography.

Authors:  Ryota Otsubo; Toshiko Hatachi; Kenichiro Shibata; Takuya Yoshida; Hironosuke Watanabe; Masahiro Oikawa; Megumi Matsumoto; Hiroshi Yano; Hideki Taniguchi; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems.

Authors:  H J Kock; M Pietsch; U Krause; H Wilke; F W Eigler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in patients with cancer.

Authors:  P Debourdeau; D Farge; M Beckers; C Baglin; R M Bauersachs; B Brenner; D Brilhante; A Falanga; G T Gerotzafias; N Haim; A K Kakkar; A A Khorana; R Lecumberri; M Mandala; M Marty; M Monreal; S A Mousa; S Noble; I Pabinger; P Prandoni; M H Prins; M H Qari; M B Streiff; K Syrigos; H R Büller; H Bounameaux
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.824

5.  Right- and left-subclavian vein port-a-cath systems: comparison of complications.

Authors:  Y-F Tsai; Y-H Ku; S-W Chen; W-T Huang; C-C Lu; C-J Tsao
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 1.745

6.  Ultrasound-guided vein puncture versus surgical cut-down technique in totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADS): a prospective comparative study on safety, efficacy andcomplications.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cavallaro; Alessandro Sanguinetti; Olga Iorio; Giuseppe D'Ermo; Andrea Polistena; Nicola Avenia; Gianfranco Silecchia; Giorgio De Toma
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

7.  The Safety Level of Total Central Venous Access Port Implantation Performed by Residents.

Authors:  Teresa Schreckenbach; Indra Münch; Hanan El Youzouri; Wolf Otto Bechstein; Nils Habbe
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  A randomized study of left versus right internal jugular vein cannulation in adults.

Authors:  C A Sulek; M L Blas; E B Lobato
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.452

9.  Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  R Biffi; F Orsi; S Pozzi; U Pace; G Bonomo; L Monfardini; P Della Vigna; N Rotmensz; D Radice; M G Zampino; N Fazio; F de Braud; B Andreoni; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Percutaneous versus Cut-Down Technique for Indwelling Port Placement.

Authors:  Mario Matiotti-Neto; Mariam F Eskander; Omidreza Tabatabaie; Gyulnara Kasumova; Lindsay A Bliss; Sing Chau Ng; Nicholas E Tawa; Blanche Murphy; Jonathan F Critchlow; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  4 in total

1.  Safety of Insertion of Percutaneous Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgical Residents.

Authors:  Keisuke Obuchi; Ken Imaizumi; Hiroyuki Kasajima; Michihiro Kurushima; Minoru Umehara; Yousuke Tsuruga; Daisuke Yamana; Kentaro Sato; Aya Sato; Shinsaku Suzuki; Kazuaki Nakanishi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Comparison of Central Venous Port Procedures Between Puncture vs. Cut-down and Residents vs. Senior Surgeons.

Authors:  Ryota Otsubo; Hiroshi Yano; Megumi Matsumoto; Aya Tanaka; Takashi Nonaka; Shigekazu Hidaka; Keitaro Matsumoto; Tomoshi Tsuchiya; Shuntaro Sato; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation.

Authors:  Ching-Feng Wu; Jui-Ying Fu; Chi-Tsung Wen; Chien-Hung Chiu; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Yun-Hen Liu; Hui-Ping Liu; Ching-Yang Wu
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-24

Review 4.  Forty years after the first totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implant: the pure surgical cut-down technique only avoids immediate complications that can be fatal.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Elena Schembari; Emanuele Gaspare Fontana; Salomone Di Saverio; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.445

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.