Literature DB >> 33923312

Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation.

Ching-Feng Wu1,2, Jui-Ying Fu2,3, Chi-Tsung Wen2,4, Chien-Hung Chiu1,2, Ming-Ju Hsieh1,2, Yun-Hen Liu1,2, Hui-Ping Liu1,2, Ching-Yang Wu1,2.   

Abstract

Intravenous ports serve as vascular access and are indispensable in cancer treatment. Most studies are not based on a systematic and standardized approach. Hence, the aim of this study was to demonstrate long-term results of port implantation following a standard algorithm. A total of 2950 patients who underwent intravenous port implantation between March 2012 and December 2018 were included. Data of patients managed following a standard algorithm were analyzed for safety and long-term outcomes. The cephalic vein was the predominant choice of entry vessel. In female patients, wire assistance without use of puncture sheath was less likely and echo-guided puncture via internal jugular vein (IJV) with use of puncture sheath was more likely to be performed, compared to male patients (p < 0.0001). The procedure-related complication rate was 0.07%, and no pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, catheter fracture, or pocket erosion was reported. Catheter implantations by echo-guided puncture via IJV notably declined from 4.67% to 0.99% (p = 0.027). Mean operative time gradually declined from 37.88 min in 2012 to 23.20 min in 2018. The proposed standard algorithm for port implantation reduced the need for IJV echo-guided approach and eliminated procedure-related catastrophic complications. In addition, it shortened operative time and demonstrated good functional results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intravenous port; standard algorithm; totally implantable vascular access device

Year:  2021        PMID: 33923312     DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Med        ISSN: 2075-4426


  29 in total

1.  Catastrophic hemothorax on the contralateral side of the insertion of an implantable subclavian venous access device and the ipsilateral side of the removal of the infected port -A case report-.

Authors:  Ji-Heui Lee; Young Bae Kim; Min Kee Lee; Jong Il Kim; Ji-Yeon Lee; So Young Lee; Eun-Ju Lee; Yong Seock Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-09-20

Review 2.  Reducing catheter-related thrombosis using a risk reduction tool centered on catheter to vessel ratio.

Authors:  Timothy R Spencer; Keegan J Mahoney
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Initial experiences with a new design for a preattached intravenous port device.

Authors:  Ching-Yang Wu; Jui-Ying Fu; Ching-Feng Wu; Chia-Hui Cheng; Yen-Ting Liu; Po-Jen Ko; Yun-Hen Liu; Yen Chu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.368

4.  Analysis of chest X-ray plain film images of intravenous ports inserted via the superior vena cava.

Authors:  Jui-Ying Fu; Ching-Feng Wu; Po-Jen Ko; Ching-Yang Wu; Tsung-Chi Kao; Sheng-Yueh Yu; Yun-Hen Liu; Hung-Chang Hsieh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Superior Vena Cava Port Catheter Tip Confirmation: Quantified Formula for Intravascular Catheter Length versus Anatomic Landmark Reference.

Authors:  Ching-Yang Wu; Jui-Ying Fu; Ching-Feng Wu; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Chi-Tsung Wen; Chia-Hui Cheng; Yun-Hen Liu; Po-Jen Ko
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 1.466

6.  Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception.

Authors:  Cédric Plumhans; Andreas H Mahnken; Christina Ocklenburg; Sebastian Keil; Florian F Behrendt; Rolf W Günther; Felix Schoth
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients.

Authors:  S P Povoski
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  A single-center study of vascular access sites for intravenous ports.

Authors:  Ching-Feng Wu; Po-Jen Ko; Ching-Yang Wu; Yun-Hen Liu; Tsung-Chi Kao; Sheng-Yueh Yu; Hao-Jui Li; Hung-Chang Hsieh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Recommended irrigation volume for an intravenous port: Ex vivo simulation study.

Authors:  Ching-Yang Wu; Chia-Hui Cheng; Jui-Ying Fu; Yen Chu; Ching-Feng Wu; Chien-Hung Chiu; Po-Jen Ko; Yun-Hen Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison between ultrasound-guided TIVAD via the right innominate vein and the right internal jugular vein approach.

Authors:  Xingwei Sun; Xuming Bai; Jiaofeng Shen; Ziyang Yu; Zhixiang Zhuang; Yong Jin
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  1 in total

1.  Central venous catheterization: the cephalic vein access.

Authors:  Shouyin Jiang; Yehua Shen; Xiaogang Zhao
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 19.334

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.