Literature DB >> 26645575

Evaluation of totally implantable central venous access devices with the cephalic vein cut-down approach: Usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography.

Ryota Otsubo1,2, Toshiko Hatachi2, Kenichiro Shibata2, Takuya Yoshida1,2, Hironosuke Watanabe1,2, Masahiro Oikawa1,3, Megumi Matsumoto1, Hiroshi Yano1, Hideki Taniguchi2, Takeshi Nagayasu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of this retrospective study, were to evaluate totally implantable central venous access device (TICVAD) implantation and to validate the efficacy of preoperative ultrasonography.
METHODS: A total of 380 cases implanted with TICVADs were divided into four groups: cut-downs with ultrasonography (group A, n = 112); cut-downs without ultrasonography (group B, n = 37); venous puncture (group C, n = 122); and replacements using the existing catheter (group D, n = 109). Operation time, completion rate, and complications were compared.
RESULTS: The average operating time was 41.7, 52.4, and 40.6 min in groups A, B (P < 0.01), and C, respectively. Group A and B experienced no postoperative pneumothorax, arterial puncture, or pinch-off syndrome. Completion rates were 93.7% in group A and 86.5% in group B. Preoperative ultrasonography identified the cephalic vein in 94.1% of subjects with an average diameter of 3.1 mm and depth of 10.2 mm. Identifying convergence of the cephalic vein and the axillary vein improved the completion rate.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the cephalic vein cut-down approach for TICVAD implantation reduced complications. Preoperative ultrasonography resulted in a shorter operating time and higher completion rate.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; indwelling catheter; totally implantable central venous access device; ultrasonography; venous cutdown

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26645575     DOI: 10.1002/jso.24100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  10 in total

1.  Safety of Insertion of Percutaneous Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgical Residents.

Authors:  Keisuke Obuchi; Ken Imaizumi; Hiroyuki Kasajima; Michihiro Kurushima; Minoru Umehara; Yousuke Tsuruga; Daisuke Yamana; Kentaro Sato; Aya Sato; Shinsaku Suzuki; Kazuaki Nakanishi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Comparison of Central Venous Port Procedures Between Puncture vs. Cut-down and Residents vs. Senior Surgeons.

Authors:  Ryota Otsubo; Hiroshi Yano; Megumi Matsumoto; Aya Tanaka; Takashi Nonaka; Shigekazu Hidaka; Keitaro Matsumoto; Tomoshi Tsuchiya; Shuntaro Sato; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Cephalic Vein Cut-down for Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices With Preoperative Ultrasonography by Surgical Residents.

Authors:  Shintaro Hashimoto; Ryota Otsubo; Masahiro Adachi; Ryoichiro Doi; Kenichiro Shibata; Isao Sano; Yoshihito Shibata; Takayuki Nakazaki; Hideki Taniguchi; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Arm port vs chest port: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guanhua Li; Yu Zhang; Hongmin Ma; Junmeng Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Ultrasound-guided totally implantable venous access ports via the right innominate vein: a new approach for patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Liang Xu; Wenming Qin; Weiwei Zheng; Xingwei Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Cephalic vein approach for the implantable central venous access: A retrospective review of the single institution's experiences; Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jiyoung Rhu; Kang Woong Jun; Byung Joo Song; Kiyoung Sung; Jinbeom Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Successful Retrieval of a Dismembered Central Venous Catheter Stuck to the Right Pulmonary Artery Using a Stepwise Approach.

Authors:  Keisuke Nakabayashi; Hidekimi Nomura; Daichi Isomura; Ryo Sugiura; Toshiaki Oka
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-07

8.  A Five-Year Data Report of Long-Term Central Venous Catheters Focusing on Early Complications.

Authors:  Harald Lenz; Kirsti Myre; Tomas Draegni; Elizabeth Dorph
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-12-10

9.  Comparison between ultrasound-guided TIVAD via the right innominate vein and the right internal jugular vein approach.

Authors:  Xingwei Sun; Xuming Bai; Jiaofeng Shen; Ziyang Yu; Zhixiang Zhuang; Yong Jin
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 10.  Forty years after the first totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implant: the pure surgical cut-down technique only avoids immediate complications that can be fatal.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Elena Schembari; Emanuele Gaspare Fontana; Salomone Di Saverio; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.445

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.