| Literature DB >> 31652533 |
Baoqing Pei1,2, Wei Wang3,4, Nicholas Dunne5, Xiaoming Li6,7.
Abstract
With advances in bone tissue regeneration and engineering technology, various biomaterials as artificial bone substitutes have been widely developed and innovated for the treatment of bone defects or diseases. However, there are no available natural and synthetic biomaterials replicating the natural bone structure and properties under physiological conditions. The characteristic properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) make them an ideal candidate for developing innovative biomimetic materials in the bone biomedical field. Indeed, CNT-based materials and their composites possess the promising potential to revolutionize the design and integration of bone scaffolds or implants, as well as drug therapeutic systems. This review summarizes the unique physicochemical and biomedical properties of CNTs as structural biomaterials and reinforcing agents for bone repair as well as provides coverage of recent concerns and advancements in CNT-based materials and composites for bone tissue regeneration and engineering. Moreover, this review discusses the research progress in the design and development of novel CNT-based delivery systems in the field of bone tissue engineering.Entities:
Keywords: bone regeneration; carbon nanotubes; drug system; scaffolds; tissue engineering
Year: 2019 PMID: 31652533 PMCID: PMC6835716 DOI: 10.3390/nano9101501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic diagram describing the role of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as scaffold composites in bone tissue engineering and regeneration.
Figure 2Optimized bioavailability of a carbon nanotube–hydroxyapatite (CNT-HA) composite in bone engineering. (A) Schematic diagram of the preparation process of the CNT–HA composite. (B) Flexural strength of HA composites with different contents of CNTs. (C) SEM micrographs of the host–implant interface 120 days after implantation. (HA: hydroxyapatite; HC1:HA + 1% WCNT; HC2:HAC + 2% MWCNT; HFC1:HA + 1% functionalized-MWCNT, and HFC2:HA + 2% functionalized-MWCNT). (D) Fluorochrome labeling images at 120 days after implantation showing new bone (golden yellow) and old bone (deep sea green). Reproduced with permission from [147,148]. Elsevier, 2016.
Figure 3Carbon nanotube-reinforced chitosan (CNT-CS) biomaterials with in vivo and in vitro bioactivity and mechanical strength. (A) MTT assay of the viability of an MG-63 osteoblast-like cell; (b) protein estimation; and (c) Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of an osteoblast-like MG-63 cell on different CS–MWCNT composite scaffolds as a function of time. (B) The surgical implantation of (a) rhBMP-2 adsorbed MWCNT–CS scaffolds into the subcutaneous muscular pocket of a mouse; (b) optical microscope micrograph of regenerated bone tissue; (c,d) optical micrograph in detail of regenerated bone tissue (blue–green), the remaining scaffold (black), and plenty of fibroblasts (purple colored) after major disassembly of the MWCNT/CS scaffold, surrounded by muscle tissue (pink). (C) MC3T3-E1 cells spreading on interconnected porous HA ceramic (a,c) and 3D-porous CNT (b,d) scaffolds (actin filaments: red; nucleus: blue). Reproduced with permission from [159,163,164]. Elsevier, 2012, 2008; MDPI: Open Access, 2017.
Figure 4Carbon nanotube (CNT)-based collagen and gelatin natural polymer matrix for bone formation. (A) Histology of bone formation (white asterisk) at 28 days after bone marrow implantation. The uncoated sponge on the left is surrounded by a small amount of newly formed bone; the MWCNT-coated sponge on the right is surrounded by a large amount of newly formed bone. (B) The amounts of new bone formed around the MWCNT-coated scaffold are significantly higher than that around uncoated scaffolds at 28 after implantation (* p < 0.05). (C) Schematic demonstration of the preparation of functionalized CNT–Gelatin (Gel)–hydroxyapatite hybridized nanofiber assembly, which is comparable to collagen fibers in natural bone structure. The preparation schematic diagram of functionalized CNT–Gel–hydroxyapatite (HA) composite, which is similar to natural bone structure. (D) Elastic modulus, tensile strength and elongation rate of Gel: gelatin, f-CNT + Gel:functionalized-CNT + gelatin, which were prepared only by physical mixing, f-CNT/Gel:functionalized-CNT+gelatin, and f-CNT/Gel/HA:functionalized-CNT + gelatin + hydroxyapatite membrane samples. (E) The distribution and viability of MC3T3-E1 cells on Chitosan–gelatin–HA-0.6% MWCNT scaffolds (incubation for 2 days, scale: 50 μm). Calcein (green) staining shows the spread of live cells, Hoechst (blue) staining shows the cell nucleus. Reproduced with permission from [175,176,177]. Elsevier, 2011, 2014; MDPI: Open Access, 2019.
Figure 5Carbon nanotube- polycaprolactone (PCL–CNT) scaffolds used for bone regeneration (A): (a) AFM images of the surface topography of the printed PCL–MWCNT scaffolds; (b) SEM images of cell morphology at day 14 on the PCL-MWCNT scaffold. (B) Fluorescence microscopy images of (a) PCL and (b) PCL-3 wt.% MWCNTs; and (c) confocal images of cell morphology on surfaces of all PCL–MWCNT scaffolds at 14 day. (C) ALP activity of bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) cultured on different scaffolds at 3, 7, and 10 days, * p < 0.05. Reproduced with permission from [187,189]. Elsevier, 2019, 2012.
Figure 6The application of carbon nanotube (CNT)-based polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) biomaterials for bone regeneration and fracture healing. (A) 3D reconstruction of CT images (a) and van Gieson-stained images of PMMA–MWCNT bone cement specimens at 12 weeks after implantation (b) (collagen fibers: red; nucleus of osteoblast: brown-black). (B) Compressive modulus of PLGA and CNT–PLGA scaffolds (* p < 0.05). (C) Alizarin red S staining (a,b) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining (c,d) of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts on PLGA (a,c) and 1% CNT–PLGA scaffolds (b,d) at day 21. (D) Impact of level of MWCNT loading on the surface resistance of electrospun polylactic acid (PLA)–MWCNT nanofiber meshes. (E) Fluorescence microscope images (a,c) and selected scanning electron microscope images (b,d) of osteoblasts cultured on R3 (randomly oriented PLA fibers with a 3 wt.% ratio of MWCNTs) and A3 (aligned oriented PLA fibers with a 3 wt.% weight ratio of MWCNTs) for 5 and 7 days, respectively. Reproduced with permission from [192,195,199]. Elsevier, 2019, 2013 and 2013.
Applications of CNT-based nanomaterials as scaffolds or implants in bone tissue.
| Substrate Materials | CNT Application | Consequences | References |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| hydroxyapatite (HA) | bone implant materials |
enhanced mechanical properties increased proliferation of fibroblasts and osteoblast enhanced bone integration in vivo | [ |
| hydroxyapatite (HA) | coating material for implants |
promoted apatite mineralization accelerated new bone formation | [ |
| beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) | bone repair biomaterials |
induced apatite formation enhanced HA formation | [ |
| calcium phosphate cements (CPC) | injectable bone substitutes |
increased compressive strengths promoted the nucleation, growth, and formation of HA crystals | [ |
|
| |||
| chitosan (CS) | nanocomposite films |
improved elastic modulus and tensile strength improved bioactive properties | [ |
| chitosan (CS) | bone tissue scaffolds |
increased water uptake ability and porosity enhanced cell proliferation, protein content, alkaline phosphatase, and mineralization promote the ectopic bone formation | [ |
| chitosan(CS)–hydroxyapatite (HA) | bone tissue engineering |
increased elastic modulus and compressive strength adsorbed and released protein enhanced cell proliferation osteoconduction and bone generation | [ |
| silver sulfadiazine (AgSD)–chitosan (CS) nanofiber | coating material for implants |
exhibited exceptional antibacterial performance enhanced cellular compatibility proliferation reduced the incidence of bone infections | [ |
| collagen | bone repair biomaterials |
improved mechanical stability enhance the construct functionality | [ |
| collagen | 3D CNT-coated bone scaffolds |
accelerated early differentiation of osteoblasts induced new bone formation in vivo | [ |
| collagen–hydroxyapatite (HA) | bone tissue scaffolds |
increased the stiffer promoted bone marrow mesenchymal stem proliferation and spreading promoted mRNA and protein expressions of bone sialoprotein and osteocalcin | [ |
| gelatin–hydroxyapatite (HA) | artificial bone grafts |
exhibited similar structure and composition to natural bone increased elastic modulus, tensile strength, and elongation rate increased cell viability | [ |
| gelatin–chitosan (CS) | bone scaffold materials |
improved mechanical strength and elastic modulus enhanced MC3T3-E1 cell adhesion, proliferation and osteogenesis differentiation | [ |
| bacterial cellulose | bone tissue scaffolds |
increased mechanical properties supported osteoblast viability, adhesion and proliferation | [ |
| silk fibroin | nanocomposite films |
supported bone cell adhesion and growth | [ |
|
| |||
| polycaprolactone (PCL) | 3D bone scaffolds |
Increased tensile and compressive strength improved cell attachment proliferation and differentiation, and protein adsorption | [ |
| polycaprolactone (PCL)–hydroxyapatite (HA) | 3D bone scaffolds |
improved compressive strength and elastic modulus induced substantial mineralization of apatite supported cellular growth, angiogenesis, and tissue development | [ |
| polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) | bone cements |
improved the fatigue properties permitted the cell adhesion and growth | [ |
| polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) | bone cements |
promoted cell adhesion induced osteogenic differentiation promoted osseointegration | [ |
| Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) | load-bearing bone tissue scaffolds |
improved the polymeric scaffold’s mechanical strength displayed good cellular and tissue compatibility, | [ |
| Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) | bone repair scaffolds |
enhanced the mechanical strength controllable surface roughness increased osteoblasts attachment and proliferation | [ |
| polylactic acid (PLA) | nanocomposite materials |
increased the tensile strength, elongation at break and impact strength obtained a higher thermal stability | [ |
| polylactic acid (PLA) | bone tissue engineering |
exhibited electrical conductivity promoted elongation and outgrowth of osteoblasts by electrical stimulation | [ |
| poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) | bone tissue engineering |
improved Young’s modulus supported the adhesion and proliferation of human bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) | [ |
| polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)–chitosan (CS) | bone tissue engineering |
exhibited small diameters (~160 nm) and high porosity adsorbed much more protein improved the cell response and proliferation | [ |
| poly(etheretherketone)-calcium polyphosphate cements (CPPs) | load-bearing orthopedic application |
enhanced mechanical performance close to or higher than human cortical bone promoted initial cell adhesion, viability and osteogenic differentiation | [ |
Figure 7A CNT-based drug delivery system. Due to the poor cell penetration of many small molecules and an increasing number of large molecules, CNTs functionalized with a targeted ligand were able to penetrate cell membranes through an ion channel and transport-specific drug molecules into targeted cells.
Applications of CNT composites as nanocarriers for bone tissue regeneration and engineering.
| Delivery System | Drugs/Molecular Type | Consequences | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| carbon nanotube (CNTs)/silk fibroin–hydroxyapatite (HA)/polyamide 66 (nHA/PA66) scaffolds | Dexamethasone (DEX) | Promoted the expression of osteoblast genes and induced the osteogenic differentiation | [ |
| Chitosan (CS)–CNTs nanoparticles | isoniazid | Prolonged the release time, stabilized the release rate of isoniazid, retained the biological function, and reduced the cytotoxicity and inflammatory response of isoniazid | [ |
| HA–alginate–MWCNT + Fe beads | chlorhexidine | Prolonged chlorhexidine release time and showed high a young’s modulus comparable to steel | [ |
| CNT–chitosan (CS)–hydroxyapatite (HA) composite materials | ibuprofen (IBU) | Controlled the release of both low and high molecular weight hydrophilic drugs | [ |
| HA–magnetite–MWCNT nanocomposite with magnetite nanoparticles (MWCNT/Fe3O4) | clodronate | Improved magnetic properties, induced bone biomineralization, and inhibited osteoclast activity in vitro | [ |
| CNT–mesoporous silica composites | zoledronic acid (Zol) | Ensured the 3D conductive network to transmit the electrical stimuli, affected osteoblasts cultured over the surface, and increased the drug loading | [ |
| CNT gel scaffold via specific pairing of functionalized nucleobases | human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) | Significantly increased the spontaneous osteogenesis on bio-electrical gel scaffolds and enhanced cell differentiation and organization via extra electrical stimulus. | [ |
| CNT arrays | recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), poloxamer | Retained a larger amount of rhBMP-2, delayed protein release and inhibited the large initial burst | [ |
| hydroxyapatite (HA)–collagen–MWCNT composite scaffolds | recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-9 (BMP-9) | Enhanced osteogenic differentiation in vitro and induced more new bone formation in vivo | [ |
| carboxylic acid-functionalized MWCNT–monetite-based CPC | Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-al (MG132) | Exhibited a sustained drug release, and confirmed the therapeutic effect by the inhibition of cytokine-induced osteoclast differentiation | [ |
| poly(lactic-co-glycolic) (PLGA)-functionalized CNTs materials | pro-apoptotic protein caspase-3 (CP3) | Promoted delivery of RNA and transcription factor to cells and demonstrated a pronounced ability of cell penetration | [ |
Figure 8Hydroxyapatite (HA)–alginate (Alg)–multi carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) + Fe beads loaded with chlorhexidine used to fill bone defects. (A) The appearances of HA–Alg (left tubes) and HA–Alg–MWCNT + Fe (right tubes) immediately after being placed in PBS on the left figure and after 7 days in a phosphate-buffered saline at 37 °C on the right figure. (B) Chlorhexidine release kinetic of the HA–Alg and HA–Alg–MWCNT + Fe beads. (C) Compression strength (σ) of the HA–Alg and HA–Alg–MWCNT + Fe beads. εdestr: maximal relative deformations. Reproduced with permission from [221]. Elsevier, 2018.
Figure 9Carbon nanotube (CNT)-based composites as carriers for loading bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). (A) In vivo radiographic examinations at 12 weeks postoperatively: analysis of the CT images (top) and hematoxylin and eosin staining on the sectioned slices (bottom) showed a significantly larger area of new bone regeneration on the nHACM/B9+BMMSC (nano-hydroxyapatite–collagen I-MWCNT/human bone morphogenetic protein-9 + bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells) groups. (B) The proportion of new bone formation in vivo and (C) ALP activity in vitro after 4 days of culture in the control, nHACM + BMMSC, and nHACM/B9 + BMMSC groups, indicating that nHACM-B9 scaffolds promoted osteogenic differentiation of BMMSCs. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001). (D) Schematic assembly diagram of a BMP-2-loaded CNT gelatin (gel)-based scaffold via Watson–Crick base pairing. (E) Proliferation of human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in a BMP-2-loaded CNT gel-based scaffold under electrically stimulus. (a) DNA contents of encapsulated ASCs in CNT gel-based scaffolds as a function of culture time. The DNA content of embedded ASCs in the scaffold changed with culture time. (b,c) SEM images show the CNT matrices contained in the ASCs and BMP-2 after 7 and 14 days of culture. Reproduced with permission from [226,229]. Hindawi and Royal Society of Chemistry: Open Access, 2019.
Figure 10Carbon nanotube (CNT)-based delivery systems for peptides and proteases. (A) SEM images of calcium phosphate cement (CPC)–MWCNT–Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-al (MG132). (B) The luciferase assay shows that MG132 released from CPC or CPC–MWCNT inhibited TNF-α-induced NF-κB activation and osteoclast differentiation. (C) Schematic diagram of CNT–poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) conjugate fabrication and cell-to-cell delivery. (D) Penetration of CNT–PLGA–proteins into osteosarcoma cells cultured in CNT–PLGA–fBSA (fluorescent bovine serum albumin) (a,b) and CNT–PLGA–BSA penetrating the osteosarcoma cell (c,d). Reproduced with permission from [230,233]. Elsevier, 2014; PLOS: Open Access, 2013.