Literature DB >> 24687391

Functionalized carbon nanotube reinforced scaffolds for bone regenerative engineering: fabrication, in vitro and in vivo evaluation.

Paiyz E Mikael1, Ami R Amini, Joysurya Basu, M Josefina Arellano-Jimenez, Cato T Laurencin, Mary M Sanders, C Barry Carter, Syam P Nukavarapu.   

Abstract

Designing biodegradable scaffolds with bone-compatible mechanical properties has been a significant challenge in the field of bone tissue engineering and regenerative engineering. The objective of this work is to improve the polymeric scaffold's mechanical strength by compositing it with mechanically superior carbon nanotubes. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microsphere scaffolds exhibit mechanical properties in the range of human cancellous bone. On the other hand, carbon nanotubes have outstanding mechanical properties. The aim of this study is to improve further the mechanical strength of PLGA scaffolds such that they may be applicable for a wide range of load-bearing repair and regeneration applications. We have formed composite microspheres of PLGA containing pristine and modified (with hydroxyl (OH), carboxylic acid (COOH)) multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and fabricated them into three-dimensional porous scaffolds. Results show that by adding only 3% MWCNTs, the compressive strength and modulus was significantly increased (35 MPa, 510.99 MPa) compared to pure PLGA scaffolds (19 MPa and 166.38 MPa). Scanning electron microscopy images showed excellent cell adhesion and proliferation. In vitro studies exhibited good cell viability, proliferation and mineralization. The in vivo study, however, indicated differences in inflammatory response throughout the 12 weeks of implantation, with OH-modified MWCNTs having the least response, followed by unmodified and COOH-modified exhibiting a more pronounced response. Overall, our results show that PLGA scaffolds containing water-dispersible MWCNTs are mechanically stronger and display good cellular and tissue compatibility, and hence are potential candidates for load-bearing bone tissue engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24687391     DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/9/3/035001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  24 in total

1.  Hierarchical polymeric scaffolds support the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Rosa Akbarzadeh; Joshua A Minton; Cara S Janney; Tyler A Smith; Paul F James; Azizeh-Mitra Yousefi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Bone Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaohua Yu; Xiaoyan Tang; Shalini V Gohil; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 9.933

3.  Self-neutralizing PLGA/magnesium composites as novel biomaterials for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Thomas O Xu; Hyun S Kim; Tyler Stahl; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.715

4.  In Vitro Bioactivity of One- and Two-Dimensional Nanoparticle-Incorporated Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Jason T Rashkow; Gaurav Lalwani; Balaji Sitharaman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Evaluation of Autologously Derived Biomaterials and Stem Cells for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Paiyz E Mikael; Aleksandra A Golebiowska; Sangamesh G Kumbar; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Evaluation of an Engineered Hybrid Matrix for Bone Regeneration via Endochondral Ossification.

Authors:  Paiyz E Mikael; Aleksandra A Golebiowska; Xiaonan Xin; David W Rowe; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering.

Authors:  Ganesh Narayanan; Varadraj N Vernekar; Emmanuel L Kuyinu; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Multi and single walled carbon nanotubes: effects on cell responses and biomineralization of osteoblasts cultures.

Authors:  Daniela C Zancanela; Amanda N de Faria; Ana Maria S Simão; Rogéria R Gonçalves; Ana Paula Ramos; Pietro Ciancaglini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Material characterization of microsphere-based scaffolds with encapsulated raw materials.

Authors:  BanuPriya Sridharan; Neethu Mohan; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 7.328

10.  [Experimental study on repairing rabbit skull defect with bone morphogenetic protein 2 peptide/functionalized carbon nanotube composite].

Authors:  Yuntao Di; Cunyang Wang; Huixue Zhu; Suxiang Yu; Yixing Ren; Xiaoming Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.