Literature DB >> 23899865

Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes and asbestos - similarities and differences.

Ken Donaldson1, Craig A Poland, Fiona A Murphy, Marion MacFarlane, Tatyana Chernova, Anja Schinwald.   

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes are a valuable industrial product but there is potential for human pulmonary exposure during production and their fibrous shape raises the possibility that they may have effects like asbestos, which caused a worldwide pandemic of disease in the20th century that continues into present. CNT may exist as fibres or as more compact particles and the asbestos-type hazard only pertains to the fibrous forms of CNT. Exposure to asbestos causes asbestosis, bronchogenic carcinoma, mesothelioma, pleural fibrosis and pleural plaques indicating that both the lungs and the pleura are targets. The fibre pathogenicity paradigm was developed in the 1970s-80s and has a robust structure/toxicity relationship that enables the prediction of the pathogenicity of fibres depending on their length, thickness and biopersistence. Fibres that are sufficiently long and biopersistent and that deposit in the lungs can cause oxidative stress and inflammation. They may also translocate to the pleura where they can be retained depending on their length, and where they cause inflammation and oxidative stress in the pleural tissues. These pathobiological processes culminate in pathologic change - fibroplasia and neoplasia in the lungs and the pleura. There may also be direct genotoxic effects of fibres on epithelial cells and mesothelium, contributing to neoplasia. CNT show some of the properties of asbestos and other types of fibre in producing these types of effects and more research is needed. In terms of the molecular pathways involved in the interaction of long biopersistent fibres with target tissue the events leading to mesothelioma have been a particular area of interest. A variety of kinase pathways important in proliferation are activated by asbestos leading to pre-malignant states and investigations are under way to determine whether fibrous CNT also affects these molecular pathways. Current research suggests that fibrous CNT can elicit effects similar to asbestos but more research is needed to determine whether they, or other nanofibres, can cause fibrosis and cancer in the long term.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asbestos; Biopersistence; Carbon nanotubes; Diameter; Fibres; Length; Lungs; Mesothelioma; Nanofibres; Pleura

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23899865     DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev        ISSN: 0169-409X            Impact factor:   15.470


  65 in total

Review 1.  Dosimetry of inhaled elongate mineral particles in the respiratory tract: The impact of shape factor.

Authors:  Bahman Asgharian; T Price Owen; Eileen D Kuempel; Annie M Jarabek
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 2.  The asbestos-carbon nanotube analogy: An update.

Authors:  Agnes B Kane; Robert H Hurt; Huajian Gao
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Chrysotile and rock wool fibers induce chromosome aberrations and DNA damage in V79 lung fibroblast cells.

Authors:  Yan Cui; Ji Ma; Wei Ye; Zhixia Han; Faqin Dong; Jianjun Deng; Qingbi Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Nanomechanical mechanism for lipid bilayer damage induced by carbon nanotubes confined in intracellular vesicles.

Authors:  Wenpeng Zhu; Annette von dem Bussche; Xin Yi; Yang Qiu; Zhongying Wang; Paula Weston; Robert H Hurt; Agnes B Kane; Huajian Gao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multiwalled carbon nanotube-induced pulmonary inflammatory and fibrotic responses and genomic changes following aspiration exposure in mice: A 1-year postexposure study.

Authors:  Brandi N Snyder-Talkington; Chunlin Dong; Dale W Porter; Barbara Ducatman; Michael G Wolfarth; Michael Andrew; Lori Battelli; Rebecca Raese; Vincent Castranova; Nancy L Guo; Yong Qian
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2016-04-19

Review 6.  Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Peter Møller; Yasuo Morimoto; Norihiro Kobayashi; Kent E Pinkerton; Linda M Sargent; Roel C H Vermeulen; Bice Fubini; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.635

7.  Multi-walled carbon nanotubes upregulate mitochondrial gene expression and trigger mitochondrial dysfunction in primary human bronchial epithelial cells.

Authors:  Ryan J Snyder; Kirsten C Verhein; Heather L Vellers; Adam B Burkholder; Stavros Garantziotis; Steven R Kleeberger
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.913

8.  Effect of surface functionalizations of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on neoplastic transformation potential in primary human lung epithelial cells.

Authors:  Todd A Stueckle; Donna C Davidson; Ray Derk; Peng Wang; Sherri Friend; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Peng Zheng; Nianqiang Wu; Vince Castranova; Yon Rojanasakul; Liying Wang
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 5.913

9.  Acquisition of Cancer Stem Cell-like Properties in Human Small Airway Epithelial Cells after a Long-term Exposure to Carbon Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Chayanin Kiratipaiboon; Todd A Stueckle; Rajib Ghosh; Liying W Rojanasakul; Yi Charlie Chen; Cerasela Zoica Dinu; Yon Rojanasakul
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2019-05-24

10.  Carcinogenic Potential of High Aspect Ratio Carbon Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Sudjit Luanpitpong; Liying Wang; Donna C Davidson; Heimo Riedel; Yon Rojanasakul
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2016-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.