Literature DB >> 31630004

Contribution of low-cost sensor measurements to the prediction of PM2.5 levels: A case study in Imperial County, California, USA.

Jianzhao Bi1, Jennifer Stowell1, Edmund Y W Seto2, Paul B English3, Mohammad Z Al-Hamdan4, Patrick L Kinney5, Frank R Freedman6, Yang Liu7.   

Abstract

Regulatory monitoring networks are often too sparse to support community-scale PM2.5 exposure assessment while emerging low-cost sensors have the potential to fill in the gaps. To date, limited studies, if any, have been conducted to utilize low-cost sensor measurements to improve PM2.5 prediction with high spatiotemporal resolutions based on statistical models. Imperial County in California is an exemplary region with sparse Air Quality System (AQS) monitors and a community-operated low-cost network entitled Identifying Violations Affecting Neighborhoods (IVAN). This study aims to evaluate the contribution of IVAN measurements to the quality of PM2.5 prediction. We adopted the Random Forest algorithm to estimate daily PM2.5 concentrations at a 1-km spatial resolution using three different PM2.5 datasets (AQS-only, IVAN-only, and AQS/IVAN combined). The results show that the integration of low-cost sensor measurements is an effective way to significantly improve the quality of PM2.5 prediction with an increase of cross-validation (CV) R2 by ~0.2. The IVAN measurements also contributed to the increased importance of emission source-related covariates and more reasonable spatial patterns of PM2.5. The remaining uncertainty in the calibrated IVAN measurements could still cause apparent outliers in the prediction model, highlighting the need for more effective calibration or integration methods to relieve its negative impact.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-cost sensor; Measurement uncertainty; Random forest; Satellite AOD

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31630004      PMCID: PMC6899193          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  26 in total

1.  Airborne microbial flora in a cattle feedlot.

Authors:  S C Wilson; J Morrow-Tesch; D C Straus; J D Cooley; W C Wong; F M Mitlöhner; J J McGlone
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Using High-Resolution Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth To Estimate Daily PM2.5 Geographical Distribution in Mexico City.

Authors:  Allan C Just; Robert O Wright; Joel Schwartz; Brent A Coull; Andrea A Baccarelli; Martha María Tellez-Rojo; Emily Moody; Yujie Wang; Alexei Lyapustin; Itai Kloog
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Satellite-Based Daily PM2.5 Estimates During Fire Seasons in Colorado.

Authors:  Guannan Geng; Nancy L Murray; Daniel Tong; Joshua S Fu; Xuefei Hu; Pius Lee; Xia Meng; Howard H Chang; Yang Liu
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.261

4.  Impacts of snow and cloud covers on satellite-derived PM2.5 levels.

Authors:  Jianzhao Bi; Jessica H Belle; Yujie Wang; Alexei I Lyapustin; Avani Wildani; Yang Liu
Journal:  Remote Sens Environ       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 10.164

5.  Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?

Authors:  Nuria Castell; Franck R Dauge; Philipp Schneider; Matthias Vogt; Uri Lerner; Barak Fishbain; David Broday; Alena Bartonova
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  An Ensemble Machine-Learning Model To Predict Historical PM2.5 Concentrations in China from Satellite Data.

Authors:  Qingyang Xiao; Howard H Chang; Guannan Geng; Yang Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences.

Authors:  S L Zeger; D Thomas; F Dominici; J M Samet; J Schwartz; D Dockery; A Cohen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Long-term exposure to PM2.5 and incidence of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jaime Madrigano; Itai Kloog; Robert Goldberg; Brent A Coull; Murray A Mittleman; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  The Imperial County Community Air Monitoring Network: A Model for Community-based Environmental Monitoring for Public Health Action.

Authors:  Paul B English; Luis Olmedo; Ester Bejarano; Humberto Lugo; Eduardo Murillo; Edmund Seto; Michelle Wong; Galatea King; Alexa Wilkie; Dan Meltzer; Graeme Carvlin; Michael Jerrett; Amanda Northcross
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Combining Community Engagement and Scientific Approaches in Next-Generation Monitor Siting: The Case of the Imperial County Community Air Network.

Authors:  Michelle Wong; Esther Bejarano; Graeme Carvlin; Katie Fellows; Galatea King; Humberto Lugo; Michael Jerrett; Dan Meltzer; Amanda Northcross; Luis Olmedo; Edmund Seto; Alexa Wilkie; Paul English
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  8 in total

1.  Socioeconomic Disparities of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors in California, 2017-2020.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Amirhosein Mousavi; Shahir Masri; Jun Wu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Examining PM2.5 concentrations and exposure using multiple models.

Authors:  James T Kelly; Carey Jang; Brian Timin; Qian Di; Joel Schwartz; Yang Liu; Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Veronica Berrocal; Michelle L Bell
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Publicly available low-cost sensor measurements for PM2.5 exposure modeling: Guidance for monitor deployment and data selection.

Authors:  Jianzhao Bi; Nancy Carmona; Magali N Blanco; Amanda J Gassett; Edmund Seto; Adam A Szpiro; Timothy V Larson; Paul D Sampson; Joel D Kaufman; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Validating and Comparing Highly Resolved Commercial "Off the Shelf" PM Monitoring Sensors with Satellite Based Hybrid Models, for Improved Environmental Exposure Assessment.

Authors:  Dan Lesser; Itzhak Katra; Michael Dorman; Homero Harari; Itai Kloog
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Observations on the particle pollution of the cities in China in the Coronavirus 2019 closure: Characteristics and lessons for environmental management.

Authors:  Hong Yao; Guangyuan Niu; Qingxiang Zhang; Qinyu Jiang; Wei Lu; Huan Liu; Tianhua Ni
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Leveraging Citizen Science and Low-Cost Sensors to Characterize Air Pollution Exposure of Disadvantaged Communities in Southern California.

Authors:  Tianjun Lu; Yisi Liu; Armando Garcia; Meng Wang; Yang Li; German Bravo-Villasenor; Kimberly Campos; Jia Xu; Bin Han
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  A Simple Optical Aerosol Sensing Method of Sauter Mean Diameter for Particulate Matter Monitoring.

Authors:  Liangbo Li; Ang Chen; Tian Deng; Jin Zeng; Feifan Xu; Shu Yan; Shu Wang; Wenqing Cheng; Ming Zhu; Wenbo Xu
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21

8.  Community-Engaged Use of Low-Cost Sensors to Assess the Spatial Distribution of PM2.5 Concentrations across Disadvantaged Communities: Results from a Pilot Study in Santa Ana, CA.

Authors:  Shahir Masri; Kathryn Cox; Leonel Flores; Jose Rea; Jun Wu
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.110

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.