Literature DB >> 10811568

Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences.

S L Zeger1, D Thomas, F Dominici, J M Samet, J Schwartz, D Dockery, A Cohen.   

Abstract

Misclassification of exposure is a well-recognized inherent limitation of epidemiologic studies of disease and the environment. For many agents of interest, exposures take place over time and in multiple locations; accurately estimating the relevant exposures for an individual participant in epidemiologic studies is often daunting, particularly within the limits set by feasibility, participant burden, and cost. Researchers have taken steps to deal with the consequences of measurement error by limiting the degree of error through a study's design, estimating the degree of error using a nested validation study, and by adjusting for measurement error in statistical analyses. In this paper, we address measurement error in observational studies of air pollution and health. Because measurement error may have substantial implications for interpreting epidemiologic studies on air pollution, particularly the time-series analyses, we developed a systematic conceptual formulation of the problem of measurement error in epidemiologic studies of air pollution and then considered the consequences within this formulation. When possible, we used available relevant data to make simple estimates of measurement error effects. This paper provides an overview of measurement errors in linear regression, distinguishing two extremes of a continuum-Berkson from classical type errors, and the univariate from the multivariate predictor case. We then propose one conceptual framework for the evaluation of measurement errors in the log-linear regression used for time-series studies of particulate air pollution and mortality and identify three main components of error. We present new simple analyses of data on exposures of particulate matter < 10 microm in aerodynamic diameter from the Particle Total Exposure Assessment Methodology Study. Finally, we summarize open questions regarding measurement error and suggest the kind of additional data necessary to address them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10811568      PMCID: PMC1638034          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.00108419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  15 in total

1.  Allowing for random errors in radiation dose estimates for the atomic bomb survivor data.

Authors:  D A Pierce; D O Stram; M Vaeth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  Indoor particles: a review.

Authors:  L Wallace
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Personal sampling of particles in adults: relation among personal, indoor, and outdoor air concentrations.

Authors:  N A Janssen; G Hoek; B Brunekreef; H Harssema; I Mensink; A Zuidhof
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles?

Authors:  J Schwartz; D W Dockery; L M Neas
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Personal exposure to airborne particles and metals: results from the Particle TEAM study in Riverside, California.

Authors:  H Ozkaynak; J Xue; J Spengler; L Wallace; E Pellizzari; P Jenkins
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar

6.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities.

Authors:  D W Dockery; C A Pope; X Xu; J D Spengler; J H Ware; M E Fay; B G Ferris; F E Speizer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution.

Authors:  D W Dockery; C A Pope
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Effects of sulfur oxides and respirable particles on human health. Methodology and demography of populations in study.

Authors:  B G Ferris; F E Speizer; J D Spengler; D Dockery; Y M Bishop; M Wolfson; C Humble
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1979-10

Review 9.  Regression calibration method for correcting measurement-error bias in nutritional epidemiology.

Authors:  D Spiegelman; A McDermott; B Rosner
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Design and analysis of multilevel analytic studies with applications to a study of air pollution.

Authors:  W Navidi; D Thomas; D Stram; J Peters
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  356 in total

1.  The EMECAM project: a multicentre study on air pollution and mortality in Spain: combined results for particulates and for sulfur dioxide.

Authors:  F Ballester; M Sáez; S Pérez-Hoyos; C Iñíguez; A Gandarillas; A Tobías; J Bellido; M Taracido; F Arribas; A Daponte; E Alonso; A Cañada; F Guillén-Grima; L Cirera; M J Pérez-Boíllos; C Saurina; F Gómez; J M Tenías
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Forest fires, air pollution, and mortality in southeast Asia.

Authors:  Narayan Sastry
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2002-02

3.  Daily deaths are associated with combustion particles rather than SO(2) in Philadelphia.

Authors:  J Schwartz
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Confounding and exposure measurement error in air pollution epidemiology.

Authors:  Lianne Sheppard; Richard T Burnett; Adam A Szpiro; Sun-Young Kim; Michael Jerrett; C Arden Pope; Bert Brunekreef
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.763

5.  Impact of measurement error in radon exposure on the estimated excess relative risk of lung cancer death in a simulated study based on the French Uranium Miners' Cohort.

Authors:  Rodrigue S Allodji; Klervi Leuraud; Anne C M Thiébaut; Stéphane Henry; Dominique Laurier; Jacques Bénichou
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 6.  Current Methods and Challenges for Epidemiological Studies of the Associations Between Chemical Constituents of Particulate Matter and Health.

Authors:  Jenna R Krall; Howard H Chang; Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat; Roger D Peng; Lance A Waller
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

7.  Particulate Matter and Traffic-Related Exposures in Relation to Breast Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Natalie C DuPré; Jaime E Hart; Michelle D Holmes; Elizabeth M Poole; Peter James; Peter Kraft; Francine Laden; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Increased ultrafine particles and carbon monoxide concentrations are associated with asthma exacerbation among urban children.

Authors:  Kristin A Evans; Jill S Halterman; Philip K Hopke; Maria Fagnano; David Q Rich
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Assessment of inter-individual, geographic, and seasonal variability in estimated human exposure to fine particles.

Authors:  Wan Jiao; H Christopher Frey; Ye Cao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Effects of short-term exposure to inhalable particulate matter on DNA methylation of tandem repeats.

Authors:  Liqiong Guo; Hyang-Min Byun; Jia Zhong; Valeria Motta; Jitendra Barupal; Yinan Zheng; Chang Dou; Feiruo Zhang; John P McCracken; Anaité Diaz; Sanchez-Guerra Marco; Silvia Colicino; Joel Schwartz; Sheng Wang; Lifang Hou; Andrea A Baccarelli
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.