Literature DB >> 12088999

Airborne microbial flora in a cattle feedlot.

S C Wilson1, J Morrow-Tesch, D C Straus, J D Cooley, W C Wong, F M Mitlöhner, J J McGlone.   

Abstract

A total of 1,408 cattle held in eight commercial feedlot pens were used to examine the quantity and diversity of microorganisms in cattle feedlot air. The effect of two feeding patterns on the generation of airborne dust and the total numbers of microorganisms was also examined (four feedlot pens/treatment). Microbial samples were collected, and dust particles that were 2.5 microm or less in diameter were measured with a Dustrak monitor during the evening dust peak for 4 days at sites both upwind and downwind of the feedlot pens. An Andersen biological cascade sampler was employed with different medium and incubation combinations for the capture and identification of bacteria and fungi. The results showed that when bacteria were considered, only nonpathogenic gram-positive organisms were recovered. However, gram-negative bacteria may have been present in a viable but nonculturable state. Fungi were recovered in smaller numbers than bacteria, and none of the fungi were pathogenic. The Dustrak results showed that one feeding pattern resulted in cattle behavior that generated levels of downwind dust lower (P = 0.04) than the levels generated by the behavior resulting from the other feeding pattern. However, the Andersen sampler results showed that there were no differences between feeding patterns with regard to the total number or diversity of microorganisms. The disparity may have been due to the different operating principles of the two systems. The overall numbers of microorganisms recovered were lower than those reported in studies of intensively housed farm animals in which similar recovery techniques were used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12088999      PMCID: PMC126758          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3238-3242.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  24 in total

1.  [Investigations on airborne microorganisms in animal stables. 3: Relationship between inhalable endotoxin, inhalable dust and airborne bacteria in a hen house].

Authors:  B A Zucker; W Müller
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.328

2.  Effects of aerosolized feedyard dust that contains natural endotoxins on adult sheep.

Authors:  Charles W Purdy; David C Straus; Norbert Chirase; David B Parker; J R Ayers; Mark D Hoover
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.156

3.  Survey of Salmonella serotypes in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  P J Fedorka-Cray; D A Dargatz; L A Thomas; J T Gray
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.077

4.  Effect of aerosolization on culturability and viability of gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  J F Heidelberg; M Shahamat; M Levin; I Rahman; G Stelma; C Grim; R R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Microbiological and chemical survey of beef cattle waste from a nonsurfaced feedlot.

Authors:  D W Thayer; P Lewter; J Barker; J J Chen
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Characterization of the dominant aerobic microorganism in cattle feedlot waste.

Authors:  G R Hrubant
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-10

7.  Exposure of workers to airborne microorganisms in open-air swine houses.

Authors:  C W Chang; H Chung; C F Huang; H J Su
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Airborne gram-negative bacterial flora in animal houses.

Authors:  B A Zucker; S Trojan; W Müller
Journal:  J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health       Date:  2000-02

9.  [Airborne microorganisms in animal stables. 1. Anaerobic airborne bacteria in a calf stable with special regard to Clostridium perfringens].

Authors:  T Chai; W Müller; B A Zucker
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 0.328

10.  Comparative merits of eight popular media in aerometric studies of fungi.

Authors:  H P Burge; W R Solomon; J R Boise
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 10.793

View more
  12 in total

1.  Contribution of low-cost sensor measurements to the prediction of PM2.5 levels: A case study in Imperial County, California, USA.

Authors:  Jianzhao Bi; Jennifer Stowell; Edmund Y W Seto; Paul B English; Mohammad Z Al-Hamdan; Patrick L Kinney; Frank R Freedman; Yang Liu
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Culturable airborne bacteria in outdoor environments in Beijing,China.

Authors:  Zhiguo Fang; Zhiyun Ouyang; Hua Zheng; Xiaoke Wang; Lifeng Hu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Differential inflammatory potential of particulate matter (PM) size fractions from Imperial Valley, CA.

Authors:  S M D'Evelyn; Cfa Vogel; K J Bein; B Lara; E A Laing; R A Abarca; Q Zhang; L Li; J Li; T B Nguyen; K E Pinkerton
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Antibiotics, bacteria, and antibiotic resistance genes: aerial transport from cattle feed yards via particulate matter.

Authors:  Andrew D McEachran; Brett R Blackwell; J Delton Hanson; Kimberly J Wooten; Gregory D Mayer; Stephen B Cox; Philip N Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Metagenomic analysis of the airborne environment in urban spaces.

Authors:  Nicholas A Be; James B Thissen; Viacheslav Y Fofanov; Jonathan E Allen; Mark Rojas; George Golovko; Yuriy Fofanov; Heather Koshinsky; Crystal J Jaing
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Microbial groundwater sampling protocol for fecal-rich environments.

Authors:  Thomas Harter; Naoko Watanabe; Xunde Li; Edward R Atwill; William Samuels
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Fungi Isolated From House Flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on Penned Cattle in South Texas.

Authors:  Cherity A Ysquierdo; Pia U Olafson; Donald B Thomas
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  Impact of Feed Delivery Pattern on Aerial Particulate Matter and Behavior of Feedlot Cattle.

Authors:  Frank M Mitloehner; Jeff W Dailey; Julie L Morrow; John J McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Culturable airborne bacteria in outdoor poultry-slaughtering facility.

Authors:  Ruiping Liang; Peng Xiao; Ruiping She; Shiguo Han; Lingling Chang; Lingxiao Zheng
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The unexpected role of bioaerosols in the Oxidative Potential of PM.

Authors:  A Samake; G Uzu; J M F Martins; A Calas; E Vince; S Parat; J L Jaffrezo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.