Literature DB >> 35196049

Socioeconomic Disparities of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors in California, 2017-2020.

Yi Sun1, Amirhosein Mousavi1, Shahir Masri1, Jun Wu1.   

Abstract

Objectives. To (1) examine the disparity in availability of PurpleAir low-cost air quality sensors in California based on neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and exposure to fine particulate matter smaller than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5), (2) investigate the temporal trend of sensor distribution and operation, and (3) identify priority communities for future sensor distribution. Methods. We obtained census tract-level SES variables and PM2.5 concentrations from the CalEnviroScreen4.0 data set. We obtained real-time PurpleAir sensor data (July 2017-September 2020) to examine sensor distribution and operation. We conducted spatial and temporal analyses at the census tract level to investigate neighborhood SES and PM2.5 concentrations in relation to sensor distribution and operation. Results. The spatial coverage and the number of PurpleAir sensors increased significantly in California. Fewer sensors were distributed in census tracts with lower SES, higher PM2.5, and higher proportions of racial/ethnic minority populations. Furthermore, a large proportion of existing sensors were not in operation at a given time, especially in disadvantaged communities. Conclusions. Disadvantaged communities should be given access to low-cost sensors to fill in spatial gaps of air quality monitoring and address environmental justice concerns. Sensor purchasing and deployment must be paired with regular maintenance to ensure their reliable performance. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(3):434-442. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306603).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35196049      PMCID: PMC8887182          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  17 in total

Review 1.  The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring.

Authors:  Emily G Snyder; Timothy H Watkins; Paul A Solomon; Eben D Thoma; Ronald W Williams; Gayle S W Hagler; David Shelow; David A Hindin; Vasu J Kilaru; Peter W Preuss
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Linking science and policy through community-based participatory research to study and address health disparities.

Authors:  Meredith Minkler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring.

Authors:  Aakash C Rai; Prashant Kumar; Francesco Pilla; Andreas N Skouloudis; Silvana Di Sabatino; Carlo Ratti; Ansar Yasar; David Rickerby
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Disparities in Distribution of Particulate Matter Emission Sources by Race and Poverty Status.

Authors:  Ihab Mikati; Adam F Benson; Thomas J Luben; Jason D Sacks; Jennifer Richmond-Bryant
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Benefits of High Resolution PM2.5 Prediction using Satellite MAIAC AOD and Land Use Regression for Exposure Assessment: California Examples.

Authors:  Hyung Joo Lee
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale.

Authors:  Jianzhao Bi; Avani Wildani; Howard H Chang; Yang Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Contribution of low-cost sensor measurements to the prediction of PM2.5 levels: A case study in Imperial County, California, USA.

Authors:  Jianzhao Bi; Jennifer Stowell; Edmund Y W Seto; Paul B English; Mohammad Z Al-Hamdan; Patrick L Kinney; Frank R Freedman; Yang Liu
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 8.  Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Tools: From Research to Practice (A Workshop Summary).

Authors:  Andrea L Clements; William G Griswold; Abhijit Rs; Jill E Johnston; Megan M Herting; Jacob Thorson; Ashley Collier-Oxandale; Michael Hannigan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Impact of California Fires on Local and Regional Air Quality: The Role of a Low-Cost Sensor Network and Satellite Observations.

Authors:  P Gupta; P Doraiswamy; R Levy; O Pikelnaya; J Maibach; B Feenstra; Andrea Polidori; F Kiros; K C Mills
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2018-05-23

10.  MoreAir: A Low-Cost Urban Air Pollution Monitoring System.

Authors:  Ihsane Gryech; Yassine Ben-Aboud; Bassma Guermah; Nada Sbihi; Mounir Ghogho; Abdellatif Kobbane
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.