Literature DB >> 31621695

Using n-Level Structural Equation Models for Causal Modeling in Fully Nested, Partially Nested, and Cross-Classified Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yaacov Petscher1, Christopher Schatschneider1.   

Abstract

Complex data structures are ubiquitous in psychological research, especially in educational settings. In the context of randomized controlled trials, students are nested in classrooms but may be cross-classified by other units, such as small groups. Furthermore, in many cases only some students may be nested within a unit while other students may not. Such instances of partial nesting requires a more flexible framework for estimating treatment effects so that the model coefficients are correctly estimated. Although several recommendations have been offered to the field on handling partially nested data, few are comprehensive in their treatment of manifest and latent variables in the context of partial nesting, full nesting, and cross-classification. The present study introduces n-level structural equation modeling (SEM) as a flexible measurement and analytic framework for the estimation of treatment effects for complex data structures that frequently present in randomized controlled trials. In this tutorial, we explore how the notation of n-level SEM allows for parsimonious model specification whether data are observed or latent and in the presence of partial nested or cross-classified designs. By using the xxm package in R, the advantage of using n-level SEM framework is demonstrated through five examples for single outcome manifest variables, as in the traditional multilevel model, as well as latent applications as in multilevel SEM.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords:  cross-classified; multilevel SEM; n-level SEM; partially nested data; randomized controlled trial

Year:  2019        PMID: 31621695      PMCID: PMC6777070          DOI: 10.1177/0013164419840071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  13 in total

1.  Evaluating models for partially clustered designs.

Authors:  Scott A Baldwin; Daniel J Bauer; Eric Stice; Paul Rohde
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-06

Review 2.  Partially nested designs in psychotherapy trials: A review of modeling developments.

Authors:  Sonya K Sterba
Journal:  Psychother Res       Date:  2015-12-19

3.  The Impact of Inappropriate Modeling of Cross-Classified Data Structures.

Authors:  Jason L Meyers; S Natasha Beretvas
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  The Impacts of Ignoring a Crossed Factor in Analyzing Cross-Classified Data.

Authors:  Wen Luo; Oi-Man Kwok
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  People are variables too: multilevel structural equations modeling.

Authors:  Paras D Mehta; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2005-09

6.  The use of random effects models to allow for clustering in individually randomized trials.

Authors:  Katherine J Lee; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Design and analysis of clinical trials with clustering effects due to treatment.

Authors:  Chris Roberts; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Modelling partially cross-classified multilevel data.

Authors:  Wen Luo; Kevin J Cappaert; Ling Ning
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Structural Equation Modeling Approaches for Analyzing Partially Nested Data.

Authors:  Sonya K Sterba; Kristopher J Preacher; Rex Forehand; Emily J Hardcastle; David A Cole; Bruce E Compas
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Consequences of Misspecifying Levels of Variance in Cross-Classified Longitudinal Data Structures.

Authors:  Jennifer Gilbert; Yaacov Petscher; Donald L Compton; Chris Schatschneider
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparing the Effects of Reading Intervention Versus Reading and Mindset Intervention for Upper Elementary Students With Reading Difficulties.

Authors:  Jeanne Wanzek; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Yaacov Petscher; Christopher J Lemons; Samantha A Gesel; Sally Fluhler; Rachel E Donegan; Brenna K Rivas
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2020-08-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.