Literature DB >> 32814508

Comparing the Effects of Reading Intervention Versus Reading and Mindset Intervention for Upper Elementary Students With Reading Difficulties.

Jeanne Wanzek1, Stephanie Al Otaiba2, Yaacov Petscher3, Christopher J Lemons4, Samantha A Gesel5, Sally Fluhler1, Rachel E Donegan6, Brenna K Rivas2.   

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to examine the effects of providing mindset intervention in addition to reading intervention compared with only reading intervention for fourth graders with reading difficulties. Reading intervention was provided daily in 45 min sessions throughout the school year. Mindset intervention occurred in small groups for 24-30 min lessons. Multilevel structural equation modeling (SEM) via n-level SEM was used to account for the latent variable representation of constructs, and the complex nesting and cross-classification structure of the data. Students in the reading intervention plus mindset condition significantly outperformed the business as usual condition on nonword reading (d = 0.35) as did students in the reading intervention condition (d = 0.20), who also outperformed the business as usual condition on phonological processing (d = 0.28). There were no significant differences among students in the three conditions on nonword reading, word reading, phonological processing, reading comprehension, or growth mindset. Initial reading achievement, mindset, and problem behavior did not generally moderate these findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disability; intervention; reading

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32814508      PMCID: PMC8075103          DOI: 10.1177/0022219420949281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Learn Disabil        ISSN: 0022-2194


  27 in total

1.  Evaluating models for partially clustered designs.

Authors:  Scott A Baldwin; Daniel J Bauer; Eric Stice; Paul Rohde
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-06

2.  Multilevel intervention research: lessons learned and pathways forward.

Authors:  Steven B Clauser; Stephen H Taplin; Mary K Foster; Pebbles Fagan; Arnold D Kaluzny
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

3.  Why what we teach depends on when: grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size.

Authors:  Sebastian Paul Suggate
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2010-11

4.  Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement.

Authors:  David Paunesku; Gregory M Walton; Carissa Romero; Eric N Smith; David S Yeager; Carol S Dweck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-04-10

5.  Executive function and psychosocial adjustment in healthy children and adolescents: A latent variable modelling investigation.

Authors:  Adam R Cassidy
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Victoria F Sisk; Alexander P Burgoyne; Jingze Sun; Jennifer L Butler; Brooke N Macnamara
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03-05

7.  Using n-Level Structural Equation Models for Causal Modeling in Fully Nested, Partially Nested, and Cross-Classified Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yaacov Petscher; Christopher Schatschneider
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  Learning disabilities and anxiety: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jason M Nelson; Hannah Harwood
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2010-04-07

9.  A Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Struggling Readers in Grades 4-12: 1980-2011.

Authors:  Nancy K Scammacca; Greg Roberts; Sharon Vaughn; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2013-10-03

10.  Executive Function, Self-Regulated Learning, and Reading Comprehension: A Training Study.

Authors:  Paul T Cirino; Jeremy Miciak; Elyssa Gerst; Marcia A Barnes; Sharon Vaughn; Amanda Child; Emily Huston-Warren
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2016-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.