Literature DB >> 26794915

The Impact of Inappropriate Modeling of Cross-Classified Data Structures.

Jason L Meyers, S Natasha Beretvas.   

Abstract

Cross-classified random effects modeling (CCREM) is used to model multilevel data from nonhierarchical contexts. These models are widely discussed but infrequently used in social science research. Because little research exists assessing when it is necessary to use CCREM, 2 studies were conducted. A real data set with a cross-classified structure was analyzed by comparing parameter estimates when ignoring versus modeling the cross-classified data structure. A follow-up simulation study investigated potential factors affecting the need to use CCREM. Results indicated that when the structure is ignored, fixed-effect estimates were unaffected, but standard error estimates associated with the variables modeled incorrectly were biased. Estimates of the variance components also displayed bias, which was related to several study factors.

Year:  2006        PMID: 26794915     DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4104_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  14 in total

1.  Understanding the Influence of Text Complexity and Question Type on Reading Outcomes.

Authors:  Mercedes Spencer; Allison F Gilmour; Amanda C Miller; Angela M Emerson; Neena M Saha; Laurie E Cutting
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2018-07-09

2.  Accounting for Movement between Childcare Classrooms: Does it Change Teacher Effects Interpretations?

Authors:  Claude Messan Setodji; Vi-Nhuan Le; Diana Schaack
Journal:  J Appl Dev Psychol       Date:  2012

3.  Using n-Level Structural Equation Models for Causal Modeling in Fully Nested, Partially Nested, and Cross-Classified Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yaacov Petscher; Christopher Schatschneider
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Multilevel analysis in rural cancer control: A conceptual framework and methodological implications.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Sara L McLafferty; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Patient, Physician and Organizational Influences on Variation in Antipsychotic Prescribing Behavior.

Authors:  Yan Tang; Chung-Chou H Chang; Judith R Lave; Walid F Gellad; Haiden A Huskamp; Julie M Donohue
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2016-03

6.  Effects of Compounded Nonnormality of Residuals in Hierarchical Linear Modeling.

Authors:  Kaiwen Man; Randall Schumacker; Monica Morell; Yurou Wang
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  A new way for handling mobility in longitudinal data.

Authors:  Christopher J Cappelli; Audrey J Leroux; Congying Sun
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.416

8.  Measurement in Intensive Longitudinal Data.

Authors:  Daniel McNeish; David P Mackinnon; Lisa A Marsch; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.181

9.  An introduction and integration of cross-classified, multiple membership, and dynamic group random-effects models.

Authors:  Guy Cafri; Donald Hedeker; Gregory A Aarons
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2015-08-03

10.  Impact of Not Addressing Partially Cross-Classified Multilevel Structure in Testing Measurement Invariance: A Monte Carlo Study.

Authors:  Myung H Im; Eun S Kim; Oi-Man Kwok; Myeongsun Yoon; Victor L Willson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.