| Literature DB >> 31615536 |
Ruihua Fang1, Yongjin Huang1, Jinghua Xie1, Jianzhong Zhang2, Xiaobin Ji3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is considered to be a common malignancy of the head and neck with poor prognosis for its late diagnosis, metastasis and recurrence. Growing evidence demonstrates that the dysregulation of miR-29c-3p (microRNA-29c-3p) plays an important role in various tumor processes. Our study investigates the expression of miR-29c-3p in LSCC and analyzes the correlation of its dysregulation with clinicopathologic parameters and prognosis.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma; MiR-29c-3p; MicroRNA; Prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31615536 PMCID: PMC6792187 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-019-0893-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Relationship between miR-29c-3p and clinicopathological parameters in 66 patients with LSCC
| Clinicopathologic parameters | Value, No.(%) | miR-29c-3p expression ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Male | 62 (93.94) | 2.61 ± 0.28 | 0.855 |
| Female | 4 (6.06) | 2.59 ± 0.30 | |
| Age | |||
| ≤ 60 y | 26 (39.39) | 2.62 ± 0.30 | 0.904 |
| > 60 y | 40 (60.61) | 2.61 ± 0.27 | |
| Drinking | |||
| Yes | 21 (31.82) | 2.53 ± 0.30 | 0.118 |
| No | 45 (68.18) | 2.64 ± 0.27 | |
| Smoking index | |||
| < 400 | 30 (45.45) | 2.72 ± 0.25 | 0.002 |
| ≥ 400 | 36 (54.55) | 2.51 ± 0.27 | |
| Tumor size | |||
| ≤ 3 cm | 38 (57.58) | 2.68 ± 0.25 | 0.011 |
| > 3 cm | 28 (42.42) | 2.50 ± 0.29 | |
| Tumor site | |||
| Supraglottic | 19 (28.79) | 2.47 ± 0.23 | 0.010 |
| Glottic | 45 (68.18) | 2.68 ± 0.28 | |
| Subglottic | 2 (3.03) | 2.39 ± 0.06 | |
| Differentiation | |||
| Well | 36 (54.55) | 2.69 ± 0.28 | 0.029 |
| Moderate | 23 (34.85) | 2.54 ± 0.25 | |
| Poor | 7 (10.60) | 2.43 ± 0.24 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| N0 | 36 (54.55) | 2.71 ± 0.28 | 0.001 |
| N+ | 30 (45.45) | 2.49 ± 0.24 | |
| T classification | |||
| T1 | 7 (10.61) | 2.89 ± .0.18 | 0.001 |
| T2 | 14 (21.21) | 2.74 ± .0.22 | |
| T3 | 13 (19.70) | 2.57 ± .0.65 | |
| T4 | 32 (48.48) | 2.51 ± 0.27 | |
| TNM stage | |||
| I | 7 (10.61) | 2.89 ± 0.18 | 0.004 |
| II | 13 (19.70) | 2.72 ± 0.25 | |
| III | 14 (21.21) | 2.57 ± 0.24 | |
| IV | 32 (48.48) | 2.52 ± 0.28 | |
One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the correlation between the expression of miR-29c and clinicopathological parameters of the patients.
*indicates P < 0.05.
Fig. 1Relationship between miR-29c-3p expression and clinicopathologic parameters in LSCC
Fig. 2Relationship between miR-29c-3p and lymph node metastasis. *P < 0.05
Fig. 3MiR-29c expression was relative to patient prognosis in LSCC. The survival rate in different miR-29c expression groups showed significant differences, p < 0.05
Univariate and multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis for patient prognosis in LSCC
| Clinicopathologic parameters | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) | Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) | |||
| Gender | 1.067 (0.139–8.00) | 0.950 | ||
| Age | 1.213 (0.521–2.824) | 0.654 | ||
| Drinking | 1.310 (0.579–2.960) | 0.517 | ||
| Smoking index | 0.397 (0.177–0.893) | 0.026 | ||
| Tumor size | 0.370 (0.166–0.84) | 0.015 | ||
| Tumor site | 2.495 (1.263–4.926) | 0.008 | ||
| T classification | 2.422 (1.486–3.947) | 0.000 | ||
| Differentiation | 2.620 (1.393–4.99) | 0.003 | 3.578 (1.763–7.260) | 0.000 |
| Lymph node metastasis | 7.157 (2.460–20.826) | 0.000 | 3.931 (1.11–13.786) | 0.033 |
| TNM stage | 2.462 (1.473–4.114) | 0.001 | 2.262 (1.015–5.038) | 0.046 |
| miR-29c expression | 0.215 (0.88–0.523) | 0.001 | .350 (0.129–0.949) | 0.039 |