| Literature DB >> 31600930 |
Nadine Wellington1, Meera Shanmuganathan2, Russell J de Souza3,4,5, Michael A Zulyniak6,7, Sandi Azab8, Jonathon Bloomfield9, Alicia Mell10, Ritchie Ly11, Dipika Desai12, Sonia S Anand13,14,15, Philip Britz-McKibbin16.
Abstract
A large body of evidence has linked unhealthy eating patterns with an alarming increase in obesity and chronic disease worldwide. However, existing methods of assessing dietary intake in nutritional epidemiology rely on food frequency questionnaires or dietary records that are prone to bias and selective reporting. Herein, metabolic phenotyping was performed on 42 healthy participants from the Diet and Gene Intervention (DIGEST) pilot study, a parallel two-arm randomized clinical trial that provided complete diets to all participants. Matching single-spot urine and fasting plasma specimens were collected at baseline, and then following two weeks of either a Prudent or Western diet with a weight-maintaining menu plan designed by a dietician. Targeted and nontargeted metabolite profiling was conducted using three complementary analytical platforms, where 80 plasma metabolites and 84 creatinine-normalized urinary metabolites were reliably measured (CV < 30%) in the majority of participants (>75%) after implementing a rigorous data workflow for metabolite authentication with stringent quality control. We classified a panel of metabolites with distinctive trajectories following two weeks of food provisions when using complementary univariate and multivariate statistical models. Unknown metabolites associated with contrasting dietary patterns were identified with high-resolution MS/MS, as well as co-elution after spiking with authentic standards if available. Overall, 3-methylhistidine and proline betaine concentrations increased in both plasma and urine samples after participants were assigned a Prudent diet (q < 0.05) with a corresponding decrease in the Western diet group. Similarly, creatinine-normalized urinary imidazole propionate, hydroxypipecolic acid, dihydroxybenzoic acid, and enterolactone glucuronide, as well as plasma ketoleucine and ketovaline increased with a Prudent diet (p < 0.05) after adjustments for age, sex, and BMI. In contrast, plasma myristic acid, linoelaidic acid, linoleic acid, α-linoleic acid, pentadecanoic acid, alanine, proline, carnitine, and deoxycarnitine, as well as urinary acesulfame K increased among participants following a Western diet. Most metabolites were also correlated (r > ± 0.30, p < 0.05) to changes in the average intake of specific nutrients from self-reported diet records reflecting good adherence to assigned food provisions. Our study revealed robust biomarkers sensitive to short-term changes in habitual diet, which is needed for accurate monitoring of healthy eating patterns in free-living populations, and evidence-based public health policies for chronic disease prevention.Entities:
Keywords: Prudent diet; Western diet; diet records; food provisions; mass spectrometry; metabolite profiling; metabolomics; nutritional epidemiology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31600930 PMCID: PMC6835357 DOI: 10.3390/nu11102407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1(A) Overview of study design in this parallel two-arm dietary intervention study involving participants (n = 42) from the Diet and Gene Interaction Study (DIGEST) who were assigned a Prudent or Western diet with matching urine and plasma collected at baseline, and two weeks post-intervention. (B) A 2D heat map with hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) of the plasma metabolome, including nontargeted analysis of polar/ionic metabolites by MSI-CE-MS, and total fatty acids by GC-MS. (C) A 2D heat map with HCA of the urine metabolome, including nontargeted analysis of polar/ionic metabolites, and targeted electrolytes by CE with UV detection. A generalized log transformation and autoscaling were performed on metabolomic datasets together with batch-correction and creatinine normalization for single-spot urine specimens. Participants classified as having a predominate Western diet at baseline who were then assigned a Prudent diet are designated as “W-P” (n = 24), whereas “P-W” (n = 18) refers to participants who had a lower Western diet score at baseline, but were assigned a Western diet during the intervention period.
Figure 2Summary of the metabolomics data workflow in MSI-CE-MS for the identification and quantification of biomarkers associated with a Prudent or Western diet. (A) A total ion electropherogram for plasma is shown with full-scan data acquisition under positive ion mode, whereas (B) an extracted ion electropherogram for an authentic unknown cation (i.e., [M+H]+) is annotated by its m/z:RMT based on serial injection of seven plasma samples within a single run. Each run is comprised three pairs of samples collected from DIGEST participants (i.e., baseline diet, and two weeks after food provisions) together with a QC for assessing technical precision, and correcting long-term signal drift. High-resolution MS spectra allows for determination of the most likely molecular formula, and (C) MS/MS spectra enable structural elucidation of the ion when compared to an authentic standard for ProBet. (D) Quantification of ProBet is performed by external calibration when using an internal standard (Cl-Tyr) for data normalization by MSI-CE-MS. (E) A control chart for ProBet from repeated measurements of QC samples in every MSI-CE-MS run demonstrates acceptable technical precision (CV = 13%, n = 20) over 3 days of analysis.
Major changes in dietary patterns following two weeks of a Prudent or Western diet relative to baseline habitual diet of DIGEST participants (n = 42) based on self-reported diet records.
| Diet Category a | W-P, | P-W, | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Δ Insoluble fiber intake (g/2000 kcal) | (14.0 ± 5.3) | (−5.0 ± 3.5) | |
| Δ Mg intake (mg/2000 kcal) | (189 ± 89) | (−134 ± 70) | |
| Δ Fruits + vegetables intake | (3.6 ± 1.4) | (−1.8 ± 1.3) | |
| Δ Total fiber intake (g/2000 kcal) | (16.6 ± 8.4) | (−13.4 ± 8.1) | |
| Δ Energy from sat. fat (%) | (−5.4 ± 3.2) | (4.6 ± 2.4) | |
| Δ K intake (mg/2000 kcal) | (1338 ± 617) | (−854 ± 667) | |
| Δ Vegetable intake (cup eq./2000 kcal) | (1.8 ± 0.80) | (−0.91 ± 0.92) | |
| Δ Vitamin E (mg/2000 kcal) | (7.7 ± 5.3) | (−7.0 ± 4.0) | |
| Δ Poly:sat (ratio) | (0.47 ± 0.21) | (−0.14 ± 0.18) | |
| Δ Vitamin C (mg/2000 kcal) | (149 ± 69) | (−40 ± 54) | |
| Δ Soluble fiber intake (g/2000 kcal) | (3.9 ± 2.1) | (−1.5 ± 1.5) | |
| Δ Fruit intake (cup eq./2000 kcal) | (1.79 ± 0.93) | (−0.92 ± 0.99) | |
| Δ Energy from fat (%) | (−7.5 ± 5.6) | (5.6 ± 5.6) | |
| Δ Na intake (mg/2000 kcal) | (−694 ± 590) | (754 ± 658) | |
| Δ Vitamin A (μg/2000 kcal) | (12,973 ± 56,344) | (−7,847 ± 14,060) | |
| Δ Energy from sugar (%) | (8.9 ± 5.4) | (−1.5 ± 5.8) | |
| Δ Energy from protein (%) | (1.9 ± 3.6) | (−3.2 ± 2.7) | |
| Δ Energy from carbohydrates (%) | (8.5 ± 7.8) | (−0.35 ± 5.7) | |
| Δ Cholesterol b (mg/2000 kcal) | (−101 ± 140) | (54 ± 110) | |
| Δ Energy from | (−0.26 ± 0.55) | (0.27 ± 0.23) |
a Mean daily differences (Δ) in self-reported dietary patterns were evaluated from food records collected twice over a two week period at clinical visits as compared to the baseline habitual diet of each participant. b There were no changes in measured total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol based on standard clinical blood measurements when using a two-tailed student’s t-test with equal variance.
Figure 3Paired supervised multivariate data analysis of (A) plasma and (B) creatinine-normalized urine metabolomic data using orthogonal partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) using the ratio of ion responses or concentrations for metabolites measured for each participant following two weeks of food provisions relative to their baseline habitual diet. 2D scores plot highlight differences in the overall metabolic phenotype from matching plasma and urine specimens collected from DIGEST participants assigned a Prudent (W-P) or Western (P-W) diet. A sub-set of metabolites responsive to contrasting diets are classified in the S-plots, which were largely consistent with univariate statistical analysis as shown in box-whisker plots for top-ranked metabolites differentially expressed between the two treatment arms (p < 0.05).
Top-ranked plasma metabolites associated with contrasting diets by DIGEST participants (n = 42) when using time series MEBA, mixed ANOVA, and partial correlation analysis.
| Metabolite/ID | Identifier |
|
| Food Record d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proline betaine | 144.102:0.984 (+) | 24.6 | 8.7 | 0.007 | −0.601 | <0.001 | Change %fat |
| 3-Methylhistidine | 170.092:0.664 (+) | 24.9 | 14.0 | 0.001 | 0.573 | <0.001 | Magnesium |
| Proline | 116.070:0.927 (+) | 14.6 | 5.9 | 0.020 | 0.495 | 0.002 | |
| Carnitine | 162.112:0.735 (+) | 12.2 | 8.9 | 0.005 | −0.464 | 0.003 | Poly:sat |
| Deoxycarnitine or | 146.128:0.700 (+) | 11.9 | 7.9 | 0.008 | 0.367 | 0.024 | Change %fat |
| Linoelaidic acid | 294/67.1:15.289 | 10.3 | 21.5 | <0.001 | −0.579 | <0.001 | Poly:sat |
| Pentadecanoic acid | 294/67.1:14.171 | 9.9 | 16.8 | <0.001 | −0.471 | 0.003 | Poly:sat |
| Alanine | 90.056:0.783 (+) | 9.6 | 6.2 | 0.018 | 0.452 | 0.004 | Change %sat. fat |
| Ketoleucine or | 129.056:1.209 (−) | 7.7 | 4.4 | 0.043 | 0.493 | 0.002 | Fruits + Vegetables |
| 3-Hydroxybutyric acid | 103.040:1.043 (−) | 7.6 | 2.9 | 0.097 | 0.437 | 0.006 | Fruits |
| α-Linoleic acid | 292/79.1:15.096 | 7.0 | 11.6 | 0.002 | −0.441 | 0.006 | Poly:sat |
| Ketovaline or | 115.040:1.079 (−) | 6.3 | 2.4 | 0.125 | 0.489 | 0.002 | Protein %energy |
| Myristic acid | 242/74.1:10.336 | 5.0 | 15.2 | <0.001 | −0.535 | 0.001 | Poly:sat |
| Linoleic acid | 294/67.1:14.171 | 2.6 | 16.4 | <0.001 | −0.438 | 0.006 | Poly:sat |
a Hotelling’s T-squared distribution using MEBA on glog-transformed metabolomic time series data. b Mixed ANOVA model derived from within-subject (diet × time interaction, p < 0.05) contrasts when adjusted for sex, age, and BMI. c Partial Pearson correlation of urinary metabolites to food records with listwise deletion when adjusted for sex, age, and BMI, where r > ± 0.30 and p < 0.05. d Top five nutrient categories from self-reported food records that were significantly correlated to urinary metabolites following contrasting provisional diets.
Top-ranked creatinine-normalized metabolites associated with contrasting diets by DIGEST participants (n = 42) when using time series MEBA, mixed ANOVA, and partial correlation analysis.
| Metabolite/ID | Identifier |
|
| Food Record d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Methylhistidine | 170.092:0.664 (+) | 17.9 | 7.8 | 0.008 | 0.524 | 0.001 | Fiber (total) |
| 5-Hydroxypipecolic acid | 146.081:1.180 (+) | 16.3 | 1.1 | 0.293 | −0.468 | 0.003 | Change fat |
| Imidazole propionic acid | 141.066:0.690 (+) | 16.1 | 10.8 | 0.002 | 0.515 | 0.001 | Fiber (total) |
| Proline betaine | 144.099:0.984 (+) | 15.5 | 10.8 | 0.002 | 0.487 | 0.002 | Poly:sat |
| Valinyl-valine | 217.156:0.847 (+) | 10.9 | 3.8 | 0.060 | 0.320 | 0.050 | Poly:sat |
| Enterolactone glucuronide | 473.145:0.934 (−) | 8.0 | 7.3 | 0.010 | −0.434 | 0.006 | Fat |
| Dihydroxybenzoic acid | 153.019:1.576 (−) | 8.0 | 7.3 | 0.010 | −0.403 | 0.012 | Fat |
| Dimethylglycine | 104.108:0.569 (+) | 2.9 | 3.6 | 0.065 | 0.356 | 0.028 | Fruits + Vegetables |
a Hotelling’s T-squared distribution using MEBA on glog-transformed metabolomic time series data. b Mixed ANOVA model derived from within-subject (diet × time interaction, p < 0.05) contrasts when adjusted for sex, age, and BMI. c Partial Pearson correlation of urinary metabolites to food records with listwise deletion when adjusted for sex, age, and BMI, where r > ± 0.30 and p < 0.05. d Top 5 nutrient categories from self-reported food records that were significantly correlated to urinary metabolites following contrasting provisional diets. * Exact stereochemistry for tentatively identified metabolites (level 2) in urine was uncertain given other potential isomers.
Figure 4Metabolic trajectories for two dietary biomarkers in plasma and urine that increased following a Prudent diet (W-P) as compared to a Western diet (P-W), namely (A,B) Me-His and (C,D) ProBet. Both metabolites were not different at baseline, but undergo significant changes after two weeks of assigned food provisions (q < 0.05, FDR) with concentrations moderately correlated (r > 0.400) to self-reported diet records, such as a higher average daily intake of fruit (ProBet) and protein (Me-His). Good dietary adherence was demonstrated for most DIGEST participants with only a few exceptions (labeled on plots), who had metabolic phenotypes inconsistent with their assigned diets following two weeks of food provisions.