Marta Guasch-Ferré1, Shilpa N Bhupathiraju1,2, Frank B Hu3,2,4. 1. Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 2. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 3. Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; nhbfh@channing.harvard.edu. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nutritional metabolomics is rapidly evolving to integrate nutrition with complex metabolomics data to discover new biomarkers of nutritional exposure and status. CONTENT: The purpose of this review is to provide a broad overview of the measurement techniques, study designs, and statistical approaches used in nutrition metabolomics, as well as to describe the current knowledge from epidemiologic studies identifying metabolite profiles associated with the intake of individual nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns. SUMMARY: A wide range of technologies, databases, and computational tools are available to integrate nutritional metabolomics with dietary and phenotypic information. Biomarkers identified with the use of high-throughput metabolomics techniques include amino acids, acylcarnitines, carbohydrates, bile acids, purine and pyrimidine metabolites, and lipid classes. The most extensively studied food groups include fruits, vegetables, meat, fish, bread, whole grain cereals, nuts, wine, coffee, tea, cocoa, and chocolate. We identified 16 studies that evaluated metabolite signatures associated with dietary patterns. Dietary patterns examined included vegetarian and lactovegetarian diets, omnivorous diet, Western dietary patterns, prudent dietary patterns, Nordic diet, and Mediterranean diet. Although many metabolite biomarkers of individual foods and dietary patterns have been identified, those biomarkers may not be sensitive or specific to dietary intakes. Some biomarkers represent short-term intakes rather than long-term dietary habits. Nonetheless, nutritional metabolomics holds promise for the development of a robust and unbiased strategy for measuring diet. Still, this technology is intended to be complementary, rather than a replacement, to traditional well-validated dietary assessment methods such as food frequency questionnaires that can measure usual diet, the most relevant exposure in nutritional epidemiologic studies.
BACKGROUND: Nutritional metabolomics is rapidly evolving to integrate nutrition with complex metabolomics data to discover new biomarkers of nutritional exposure and status. CONTENT: The purpose of this review is to provide a broad overview of the measurement techniques, study designs, and statistical approaches used in nutrition metabolomics, as well as to describe the current knowledge from epidemiologic studies identifying metabolite profiles associated with the intake of individual nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns. SUMMARY: A wide range of technologies, databases, and computational tools are available to integrate nutritional metabolomics with dietary and phenotypic information. Biomarkers identified with the use of high-throughput metabolomics techniques include amino acids, acylcarnitines, carbohydrates, bile acids, purine and pyrimidine metabolites, and lipid classes. The most extensively studied food groups include fruits, vegetables, meat, fish, bread, whole grain cereals, nuts, wine, coffee, tea, cocoa, and chocolate. We identified 16 studies that evaluated metabolite signatures associated with dietary patterns. Dietary patterns examined included vegetarian and lactovegetarian diets, omnivorous diet, Western dietary patterns, prudent dietary patterns, Nordic diet, and Mediterranean diet. Although many metabolite biomarkers of individual foods and dietary patterns have been identified, those biomarkers may not be sensitive or specific to dietary intakes. Some biomarkers represent short-term intakes rather than long-term dietary habits. Nonetheless, nutritional metabolomics holds promise for the development of a robust and unbiased strategy for measuring diet. Still, this technology is intended to be complementary, rather than a replacement, to traditional well-validated dietary assessment methods such as food frequency questionnaires that can measure usual diet, the most relevant exposure in nutritional epidemiologic studies.
Authors: Olivier Cloarec; Marc-Emmanuel Dumas; Andrew Craig; Richard H Barton; Johan Trygg; Jane Hudson; Christine Blancher; Dominique Gauguier; John C Lindon; Elaine Holmes; Jeremy Nicholson Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Michael J Gibney; Marianne Walsh; Lorraine Brennan; Helen M Roche; Bruce German; Ben van Ommen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Rosa Vázquez-Fresno; Rafael Llorach; Alexandre Perera; Rupasri Mandal; Miguel Feliz; Francisco J Tinahones; David S Wishart; Cristina Andres-Lacueva Journal: J Nutr Biochem Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: Helmut Schröder; Rafael de la Torre; Ramón Estruch; Dolores Corella; Miguel Angel Martínez-González; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Emilio Ros; Fernando Arós; Gemma Flores; Ester Civit; Magí Farré; Miguel Fiol; Joan Vila; Joaquín Fernandez-Crehuet; Valentina Ruiz-Gutiérrez; Jose Lapetra; Guillermo Sáez; María-Isabel Covas Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Jasmit S Shah; Shesh N Rai; Andrew P DeFilippis; Bradford G Hill; Aruni Bhatnagar; Guy N Brock Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2017-02-20 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Joram M Posma; Isabel Garcia-Perez; Gary Frost; Ghadeer S Aljuraiban; Queenie Chan; Linda Van Horn; Martha Daviglus; Jeremiah Stamler; Elaine Holmes; Paul Elliott; Jeremy K Nicholson Journal: Nat Food Date: 2020-06-22
Authors: Vasanti S Malik; Marta Guasch-Ferre; Frank B Hu; Mary K Townsend; Oana A Zeleznik; A Heather Eliassen; Shelley S Tworoger; Elizabeth W Karlson; Karen H Costenbader; Alberto Ascherio; Kathryn M Wilson; Lorelei A Mucci; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Ying Bao Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Jean-Philippe Drouin-Chartier; Pablo Hernández-Alonso; Marta Guasch-Ferré; Miguel Ruiz-Canela; Jun Li; Clemens Wittenbecher; Cristina Razquin; Estefanía Toledo; Courtney Dennis; Dolores Corella; Ramon Estruch; Montserrat Fitó; A Heather Eliassen; Deirdre K Tobias; Alberto Ascherio; Lorelei A Mucci; Kathryn M Rexrode; Elizabeth W Karlson; Karen H Costenbader; Charles S Fuchs; Liming Liang; Clary B Clish; Miguel A Martínez-González; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Frank B Hu Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Casey M Rebholz; Yan Gao; Sameera Talegawkar; Katherine L Tucker; Lisandro D Colantonio; Paul Muntner; Debby Ngo; Zsu Zsu Chen; Daniel Cruz; Daniel H Katz; Usman A Tahir; Clary Clish; Robert E Gerszten; James G Wilson Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 5.914
Authors: Clemens Wittenbecher; Fabian Eichelmann; Estefanía Toledo; Marta Guasch-Ferré; Miguel Ruiz-Canela; Jun Li; Fernando Arós; Chih-Hao Lee; Liming Liang; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Clary B Clish; Matthias B Schulze; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González; Frank B Hu Journal: Circ Res Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 17.367