Kenji Fujita1,2, Tamon Kabata3, Yoshitomo Kajino1, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, 920-8641, Japan. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Joint Reconstructive Surgery, Toyama Municipal Hospital, 2-1 Imaizumi Hokubu-machi, Toyama, 939-8511, Japan. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, 920-8641, Japan. tamonkabata@yahoo.co.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Residual feeling of leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common cause of patient dissatisfaction following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to propose a method for determining an optimal leg length correction goal in THA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 132 patients to examine the radiographic LLD (R-LLD), perceived LLD (P-LLD), and whether or not the patient has an uncomfortable feeling about the leg length after THA. RESULTS: The residual discomfort rate in all patients was 9.1% (12/132 patients), and ten of these 12 patients felt uncomfortable due to a longer leg length. When R-LLD was within 7 mm, the rate was 6.8% (8/118 patients), which is nearly equal to the rate of 7.8% (5/64 patients) in cases in which R-LLD was within 2 mm. On the other hand, when R-LLD was 8 mm or more, the rate was 57.1% (4/7 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that 7 mm may be a reasonable threshold for reducing the residual discomfort. However, even with little or no R-LLD, some patients will continue to experience discomfort. We think that this is because of pre-operative differences between R-LLD and P-LLD in such cases. If the patient has a pelvic declination on the affected hip side and a lumbar scoliosis angle that is convex toward the affected hip side before surgery, the ideal length may be a little shorter than the radiographic isometry, since such patients are likely to feel a longer leg length than that shown radiographically.
PURPOSE: Residual feeling of leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common cause of patient dissatisfaction following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to propose a method for determining an optimal leg length correction goal in THA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 132 patients to examine the radiographic LLD (R-LLD), perceived LLD (P-LLD), and whether or not the patient has an uncomfortable feeling about the leg length after THA. RESULTS: The residual discomfort rate in all patients was 9.1% (12/132 patients), and ten of these 12 patients felt uncomfortable due to a longer leg length. When R-LLD was within 7 mm, the rate was 6.8% (8/118 patients), which is nearly equal to the rate of 7.8% (5/64 patients) in cases in which R-LLD was within 2 mm. On the other hand, when R-LLD was 8 mm or more, the rate was 57.1% (4/7 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that 7 mm may be a reasonable threshold for reducing the residual discomfort. However, even with little or no R-LLD, some patients will continue to experience discomfort. We think that this is because of pre-operative differences between R-LLD and P-LLD in such cases. If the patient has a pelvic declination on the affected hip side and a lumbar scoliosis angle that is convex toward the affected hip side before surgery, the ideal length may be a little shorter than the radiographic isometry, since such patients are likely to feel a longer leg length than that shown radiographically.
Entities:
Keywords:
Perceived leg length discrepancy; Radiographic leg length discrepancy; Total hip arthroplasty
Authors: Ashish Upadhyay; Sally York; William Macaulay; Brian McGrory; Jennifer Robbennolt; B Sonny Bal Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2007-07-27 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Michael R Whitehouse; Natalija S Stefanovich-Lawbuary; Luke R Brunton; Ashley W Blom Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2013-03-16 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Ahmed A Khalifa; Arun B Mullaji; Abanoub Nagaty Gendy; Ahmed M Ahmed; Hatem M Bakr; Yaser E Khalifa; Ahmed M Abdelaal Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2021-01-09