Literature DB >> 30242514

Safety range for acute limb lengthening in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Tamon Kabata1, Yoshitomo Kajino2, Daisuke Inoue2, Takaaki Ohmori2, Junya Yoshitani2, Takuro Ueno2, Ken Ueoka2, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is no documented maximum amount that an extremity can be safely lengthened in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) without neurologic or soft tissue complications. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent primary THA with acute limb lengthening and investigated the safety range for acute limb lengthening in primary THA.
METHODS: This study included 61 hips in 52 patients who underwent primary THA with acute limb lengthening (more than 2.5 cm) without femoral shortening osteotomy. The amount of lengthening was measured from pre-operative and post-operative X-ray films using computer graphics software, then the ratios of the amount of lengthening to femoral length (L/F ratio = amount of lengthening / femoral shaft length × 100) were calculated. We investigated correlation with nerve and soft tissue complications at operation in regard to this index.
RESULTS: The average amount of lengthening was 3.0 cm (2.5 to 4.8). The average L/F ratio was 7.9 (6.2 to 12.9). There were seven nerve complications and two soft tissue complications in the whole series. In all nine complications, eight indicated higher L/F ratios than 8.7. Altogether, 12 hips indicated a higher L/F ratio than 8.7; 66% of them showed neurological or soft tissue problems. ROC curve analysis indicated that the optimal cutoff value of the L/F ratio was 8.7, which predicted acute lengthening-related complications with a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 92.3% (AUC = 0.88).
CONCLUSION: The patients who underwent THA with acute lengthening of more than 8.7% of femoral shaft length are at high risk of complications caused by acute limb lengthening in primary THA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Limb lengthening; Nerve injury; Primary total hip arthroplasty; Soft tissue contracture

Year:  2018        PMID: 30242514     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4158-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  13 in total

1.  Motor nerve palsy following primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher M Farrell; Bryan D Springer; George J Haidukewych; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Acute stretching of peripheral nerves inhibits retrograde axonal transport.

Authors:  M Tanoue; M Yamaga; J Ide; K Takagi
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1996-06

3.  Total hip reconstruction in chronically dislocated hips.

Authors:  H K Dunn; W E Hess
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Do we need intraoperative radiographs for positioning the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Kazunari Kuroda; Tamon Kabata; Toru Maeda; Yoshitomo Kajino; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  How to best measure femoral length and lateralisation after total hip arthroplasty on antero-posterior pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  Nicolas Bonin; Laurent Jacquot; Laurent Boulard; Patrick Reynaud; Mo Saffarini; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Outcome of surgery for nerve injury following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  James W Pritchett
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Nerve injury in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  N A Johanson; P M Pellicci; P Tsairis; E A Salvati
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Postoperative sciatic and femoral nerve palsy with reference to leg lengthening and medialization/lateralization of the hip joint following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  O A Nercessian; F Piccoluga; N S Eftekhar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Nerve palsy associated with total hip replacement. Risk factors and prognosis.

Authors:  T P Schmalzried; H C Amstutz; F J Dorey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Surgical approach and nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R A Navarro; T P Schmalzried; H C Amstutz; F J Dorey
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  4 in total

1.  The optimization of the length of the lower limbs after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Viktor Shilnikov; Alexey Denisov; Khadizhat Masueva
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Optimizing leg length correction in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kenji Fujita; Tamon Kabata; Yoshitomo Kajino; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Factors influencing inconsistent leg length discrepancy in dysplastic hip osteoarthritis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Genta Takemoto; Yusuke Osawa; Taisuke Seki; Yasuhiko Takegami; Satoshi Ochiai; Daisaku Kato; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Model to Predict Need for Subtrochanteric Shortening Osteotomy During Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia.

Authors:  Hai-Yang Ma; Jing-Yang Sun; Yin-Qiao Du; Zhi-Sen Gao; Jun-Min Shen; Tie-Jian Li; Yong-Gang Zhou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-10-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.