Literature DB >> 31588401

Field evaluation ratified by transcript and computational analyses unveils myco-protective role of SUGARWIN proteins in sugarcane.

Aqsa Parvaiz1, Ghulam Mustafa1, Hafiz Muhammad Walayat Ali Khan2, Faiz Ahmad Joyia1, Adnan Khan Niazi1, Sultana Anwar1, Muhammad Sarwar Khan1.   

Abstract

Nine elite sugarcane genotypes (SPF-234, CPF-246, CPF-247, CPF-248, HSF-240, CP-77-400, S-2006-US-658, S-2003-US-127 and S-2006-US-633) were assessed for field level tolerance against Colletotrichum falcatum followed by quantitative expression and computational analyses of mycoprotective proteins. Plug inoculation method was used to assess level of tolerance of aforementioned genotypes while growing in the field. Genotype S-2006-US-658 was categorized as resistant whereas genotypes CPF-246, CPF-248, HSF-240, S-2003-US-127, S-2006-US-633 and CP-77-400 were categorized as moderately resistant and genotypes SPF-234, CPF-247 as moderately susceptible. Quantitative transcript analyses also revealed that the expression of mycoprotective genes (SUGARWIN1 and SUGARWIN2) was maximum in genotype CPF-246 whereas lowest in genotype SPF-234. Hence these mycoprotective proteins play some critical role in fungal pathogen protection as genotypes with higher expression are more tolerant compared to the genotypes with lower expression of mycoprotective proteins. In-silico interaction of these mycoprotective proteins with chitin, glucan, chitosan and mannan (the core constituents of fungal cell wall) also validated their role in disease susceptibility or resistance. These studies will prove a step forward in understanding mycoprotective proteins and can be employed to develop molecular markers for the selection and screening of red rot resistant sugarcane varieties resulting in enhanced productivity of this valuable cash crop. © King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expression analysis; Field evaluation; In silico analysis; Mycoprotective proteins; Red rot

Year:  2019        PMID: 31588401      PMCID: PMC6765628          DOI: 10.1007/s13205-019-1896-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  3 Biotech        ISSN: 2190-5738            Impact factor:   2.406


  24 in total

1.  The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server.

Authors:  L J McGuffin; K Bryson; D T Jones
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Gasteiger; Alexandre Gattiker; Christine Hoogland; Ivan Ivanyi; Ron D Appel; Amos Bairoch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles.

Authors:  R Lüthy; J U Bowie; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Correlation between stability of a protein and its dipeptide composition: a novel approach for predicting in vivo stability of a protein from its primary sequence.

Authors:  K Guruprasad; B V Reddy; M W Pandit
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1990-12

5.  Protein structure modeling with MODELLER.

Authors:  Narayanan Eswar; David Eramian; Ben Webb; Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

6.  MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Michael Li; Christina Knyaz; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.

Authors:  J Kyte; R F Doolittle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  CAFASP2: the second critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods.

Authors:  D Fischer; A Elofsson; L Rychlewski; F Pazos; A Valencia; B Rost; A R Ortiz; R L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001

Review 9.  Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses.

Authors:  Rajendra Bari; Jonathan D G Jones
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  Defense-related proteins involved in sugarcane responses to biotic stress.

Authors:  Thais P Souza; Renata O Dias; Marcio C Silva-Filho
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 1.771

View more
  1 in total

1.  Over-Expression of Endogenous SUGARWIN Genes Exalted Tolerance against Colletotrichum Infection in Sugarcane.

Authors:  Aqsa Parvaiz; Ghulam Mustafa; Muhammad Sarwar Khan; Muhammad Amjad Ali
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.