Edward J Reijerse1, Vladimir Pelmenschikov2, James A Birrell1, Casseday P Richers3, Martin Kaupp2, Thomas B Rauchfuss3, Stephen P Cramer4, Wolfgang Lubitz1. 1. Max-Planck-Institut für Chemische Energiekonversion , Stiftstrasse 34-36 , 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr , Germany. 2. Institut für Chemie , Technische Universität Berlin , Strasse des 17. Juni 135 , 10623 Berlin , Germany. 3. School of Chemical Sciences , University of Illinois , 600 South Mathews Avenue , Urbana , Illinois 61801 , United States. 4. SETI Institute , Mountain View , California 94043 , United States.
Abstract
[FeFe] hydrogenases are very active enzymes that catalyze the reversible conversion of molecular hydrogen into protons and electrons. Their active site, the H-cluster, contains a unique binuclear iron complex, [2Fe]H, with CN- and CO ligands as well as an aza-propane-dithiolate (ADT) moiety featuring a central amine functionality that mediates proton transfer during catalysis. We present a pulsed 13C-ENDOR investigation of the H-cluster in which the two methylene carbons of ADT are isotope labeled with 13C. We observed that the corresponding two 13C hyperfine interactions are of opposite sign and corroborated this finding using density functional theory calculations. The spin polarization in the ADT ligand is shown to be linked to the asymmetric coordination of the distal iron site with its terminal CN- and CO ligands. We propose that this asymmetry is relevant for the enzyme reactivity and is related to the (optimal) stabilization of the iron-hydride intermediate in the catalytic cycle.
[FeFe] hydrogenases are very active enzymes that catalyze the reversible conversion of molecular hydrogen into protons and electrons. Their active site, the H-cluster, contains a unique binuclear iron complex, [2Fe]H, with CN- and CO ligands as well as an aza-propane-dithiolate (ADT) moiety featuring a central amine functionality that mediates proton transfer during catalysis. We present a pulsed 13C-ENDOR investigation of the H-cluster in which the two methylene carbons of ADT are isotope labeled with 13C. We observed that the corresponding two 13C hyperfine interactions are of opposite sign and corroborated this finding using density functional theory calculations. The spin polarization in the ADT ligand is shown to be linked to the asymmetric coordination of the distal iron site with its terminal CN- and CO ligands. We propose that this asymmetry is relevant for the enzyme reactivity and is related to the (optimal) stabilization of the iron-hydride intermediate in the catalytic cycle.
The active
site of [FeFe] hydrogenases,
called the “H-cluster”, features a two-iron subcluster
that is coordinated by CN– and CO ligands as well
as a unique 2-aza-propane 1,3-dithiolate (ADT) bridging ligand.[1] The [2Fe]H subcluster is linked to
a generic [4Fe–4S] cubane cluster through a cysteine thiolate
bridge (Figures and 2). It is assumed that the amine moiety of the ADT
bridge functions as a proton shuttle to and from the open coordination
site at the iron site (Fed) distal to the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster. The catalytically active oxidized state (Hox) is characterized by a mixed valence redox configuration
[Fe(II)Fe(I)] in the [2Fe]H subcluster. This state features
a so-called “frustrated Lewis pair” (FLP),[2] with the electrophilic Fed center
adjacent to the Brønsted basic amine of the ADT.[3] The FLP splits H2 heterolytically placing a
proton on the amine and a hydride on Fed. This Fed–H species is immediately oxidized through the electron transport
chain connected to the iron core of the H-cluster. This oxidation
converts the hydridic Fed–H to an acidic Fed–H species. The subsequent stages in the catalytic
cycle (Figure ) feature
several protonation, reduction, and proton coupled electron transfer
(PCET) steps.[4,5] This multistep sequence results
in a very flat energy landscape, which explains the very high catalytic
rates observed in [FeFe] hydrogenases (up to 10,000 s–1).[6,7]
Figure 1
Structure of the H-cluster in [FeFe] hydrogenase from Chlamydomonas
reinhardtii (CrHydA1) and the proposed catalytic
cycle.
Figure 2
Left: Schematic structure of the H-cluster in
its Hox state, triply isotope labeled with 57Fe, as well as 13C and 2H in the aza-propane-dithiolate
(ADT) ligand.
Right: Q-band EPR spectrum (pseudo modulated FID detected) of our
Hox preparation. Fitted g-values: (2.1008,
2.0398, 1.9966). A small contribution (<5%) from the Hox-CO state is evident from the feature at g = 2.006
and is marked by an asterisk. Full analysis of the EPR spectrum is
presented in Figure S2.
Structure of the H-cluster in [FeFe] hydrogenase from Chlamydomonas
reinhardtii (CrHydA1) and the proposed catalytic
cycle.Left: Schematic structure of the H-cluster in
its Hox state, triply isotope labeled with 57Fe, as well as 13C and 2H in the aza-propane-dithiolate
(ADT) ligand.
Right: Q-band EPR spectrum (pseudo modulated FID detected) of our
Hox preparation. Fitted g-values: (2.1008,
2.0398, 1.9966). A small contribution (<5%) from the Hox-CO state is evident from the feature at g = 2.006
and is marked by an asterisk. Full analysis of the EPR spectrum is
presented in Figure S2.The electronic structure of the H-cluster is strongly affected
by the spin exchange interactions between the two subclusters and
within the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster as monitored by
pulsed EPR and paramagnetic NMR studies.[8−11] These effects certainly contribute
to the facile, virtually barrier-free, electron transport over the
H-cluster. The protonation of the bridging ADT ligand amine group
appears to play a central role in modulating the electron transport
between the two subclusters.[4] Therefore,
the electronic structure, as reflected by the magnetic spin parameters
of the ADT ligand, may show features that can be related to the overall
catalytic properties of the H-cluster. Indeed, paramagnetic NMR of
Hox showed spin polarization of the methylene protons,
i.e., positive and negative spin densities.[11] In this communication, we investigate the 13C-labeled
methylene carbons of the ADT ligand using electron nuclear double
resonance (ENDOR) and electron nuclear nuclear triple resonance (TRIPLE)
spectroscopy and show that spin-polarization also occurs for these
nuclei. This phenomenon is explored using density functional theory
(DFT) quantum chemical calculations and is found to be dependent on
the asymmetry in the ligand coordination at Fed.
Isotope Labeling
For the 13C-ENDOR experiments
described herein, we took advantage of a triply labeled (2 × 57Fe, 2 × 13C, 4 × 2H) synthetic
precursor of [2Fe]H, initially prepared for ongoing nuclear
resonance vibrational spectroscopy (NRVS) experiments. The new synthetic
route for this compound is described in the Supporting Information (SI) section A and Scheme S1. The [FeFe] hydrogenase
from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CrHydA1) was produced using artificial maturation[12,13] of the apoenzyme expressed in E. coli with the
triply labeled [2Fe]H precursor (see Figure ). The enzyme was allowed to oxidize under
an N2 atmosphere (so-called “auto-oxidation”)
to produce the Hox state. This is characterized by a mixed
valence Fe(II)Fe(I) binuclear subcluster showing a characteristic
rhombic S = 1/2 EPR spectrum with g-parameters (2.1008, 2.0398, 1.9966) (see Figures and S2).[1,14] The EPR and FTIR spectra (Figure S1)
are consistent with those obtained previously for the native Hox state.[1]
Mims-ENDOR
Orientation-selective 13C Mims
ENDOR (see Experimental Section in the SI and Scheme ) was
recorded at Q-band (34 GHz) at field positions corresponding to the
range from g = 2.0 to g = 2.1 (Figure ). In order to facilitate
spectral fitting, the ENDOR spectra were normalized to the same amplitude
and symmetrized with respect to the Larmor frequency (indicated by
the arrows in Figure ).
Scheme 1
Pulse Sequence of the 13C Mims ENDOR Experiment
Figure 3
(a–i) Orientation-selective 13C Mims
Q-band ENDOR
(34 GHz) spectra of CrHydA1 in the Hox state recorded at 15 K. The indicated field positions are given
in mT. π/2 pulses were 20 ns. The waiting time τ was set
to 200 ns, while the 400W RF pulse had a length of 60 μs (see Scheme ). The red traces
represent spectral fits obtained using a home-written MATLAB script
making use of first order perturbation theory to calculate the ENDOR
transition frequencies (details in SI).
For the raw (normalized) ENDOR traces (unsymmetrized) along with the
number of scans, see Figure S3.
(a–i) Orientation-selective 13C Mims
Q-band ENDOR
(34 GHz) spectra of CrHydA1 in the Hox state recorded at 15 K. The indicated field positions are given
in mT. π/2 pulses were 20 ns. The waiting time τ was set
to 200 ns, while the 400W RF pulse had a length of 60 μs (see Scheme ). The red traces
represent spectral fits obtained using a home-written MATLAB script
making use of first order perturbation theory to calculate the ENDOR
transition frequencies (details in SI).
For the raw (normalized) ENDOR traces (unsymmetrized) along with the
number of scans, see Figure S3.At the g = 2.0 and g =
2.1 positions
(magnetic field values of 1219 and 1158.7 mT, respectively), only
molecules with one of their g-axes (x or z, respectively) oriented along the magnetic
field contribute to the ENDOR spectrum. These positions are called
“pseudo single crystal positions”. In these spectra,
clearly two doublets centered at the 13C nuclear Larmor
frequency (12.85 MHz at 1200 mT) are observed corresponding to the
nuclear spin transitions of the two 13C nuclei in the ADT
ligand. The different splitting and line-width of the two doublets
indicate that the two 13C nuclei have significantly different
hyperfine interaction (HFI) tensors differing in magnitudes and orientations.
ENDOR spectra recorded at intermediate field positions contain contributions
from molecules with multiple orientations giving rise to an EPR transition
at the effective g-value corresponding to the field
position. These multiple orientations lead to a broadening of the
ENDOR spectra showing “powder-type” features. The line-shapes
at, e.g., 1165.8 and 1205.4 G are reminiscent of “near axial
hyperfine anisotropy” for the 13C nuclei. Therefore,
in order to reduce the number of free variables, spectral fitting
was started assuming axial HFI tensors for both 13C nuclei.
First order perturbation theory was employed to calculate the ENDOR
frequencies. The (1 – cos(2πAτ))
dependence of the ENDOR amplitude was taken into account. This procedure
provided a fair but nonoptimal fit to the experimental ENDOR spectra.
Subsequently, the rhombicity parameter was relaxed, and individual
scaling of the two ENDOR components was applied. The final fitted
parameters are listed in Table and Figure S4. Given the local
mirror symmetry of the ADT ligand (Figure ), it is surprising that the two 13C HFI-tensors have significantly different magnitudes (1.9 vs 1.2
MHz for the isotropic component).
Table 1
Experimental and
DFT-Predicted 13C HFI Anisotropic and Isotropic (Fermi
Contact) Spin Couplings
(MHz) for the Two Methylene Carbons A1 and A2 in the ADT Ligand in
the Hox Statea
A1 (MHz)
A2 (MHz)
X
Y
Z
iso
X
Y
Z
iso
exptl
1.00
1.30
3.30
1.87
–1.49
–1.75
–0.45
–1.23
Anative
1.20
1.46
3.08
1.91
–1.34
–1.09
–0.26
–0.90
Enative
0.46
0.80
2.19
1.15
–1.51
–1.23
–0.30
–1.02
Ad-iso
–1.67
–1.38
–0.50
–1.18
1.31
1.59
3.33
2.07
Ap-iso
1.23
1.50
3.20
1.97
–1.71
–1.41
–0.57
–1.23
Apd-iso
–1.41
–1.12
–0.30
–0.94
1.16
1.42
3.05
1.88
Ad-rot
0.84
1.06
2.74
1.55
–2.31
–2.09
–0.38
–1.60
Ap-(CN)2
–1.44
–1.08
0.17
–0.78
–1.37
–1.02
0.22
–0.72
Ad-(CN)2
–0.46
0.07
0.40
0.01
–0.13
0.38
0.78
0.34
The experimental
(exptl) and
representative DFT (Anative) values are in bold. Other
values are from alternative isomeric DFT models shown in Figure S7.
The experimental
(exptl) and
representative DFT (Anative) values are in bold. Other
values are from alternative isomeric DFT models shown in Figure S7.
Mims
TRIPLE
In order to determine the relative signs
of the two fitted 13C HFIs, a triple resonance experiment
was conducted at a field position corresponding to g = 2.02 (magnetic field position near 1218 mT, see Figure ) where the two ENDOR doublet
features are nicely separated and still relatively sharp (Figure and Scheme ). Adjusting the radiofrequency
pumping pulse (RF1) to one of the ENDOR transitions inverts the spin
state populations corresponding to this transition. This also affects
(reduces) the population difference of the other nuclear spin transition
in the same mS manifold resulting in a reduction of the
ENDOR amplitude of the corresponding signal (see SI for more details).[15,16] Pumping the high frequency
line of the sharp 13C doublet leads to a reduction in amplitude
of the low frequency line of the broad 13C doublet (upper
spectra in Figure ). Likewise, pumping the low frequency line of the sharp doublet
causes a reduction in amplitude of the high frequency line of the
broad doublet. We must, therefore, conclude that the signs of the
two 13C hyperfine interactions are opposite (Tables and S1). This implies that at one of the ADTcarbon nuclei a negative (β)
spin density is localized.
Figure 4
Mims TRIPLE resonance
experiment (see pulse sequence in Scheme ) at B = 1218 mT. The black
traces represent the (unsymmetrized) 13C TRIPLE experiment
with the pumping frequency RF1 off resonance
at the 13C Larmor frequency, i.e., equivalent to the 13C ENDOR spectrum at B = 1218 mT (see Figure ). The red traces
represent the 13C Mims TRIPLE experiment with the RF1 pumping
frequency tuned to one of the sharp ENDOR transitions. The “TRIPLE
effect” is indicated by the red asterisks.
Scheme 2
Pulse Sequence of the 13C Mims
Triple Resonance Experiment
See Scheme S2 for extra details.
Pulse Sequence of the 13C Mims
Triple Resonance Experiment
See Scheme S2 for extra details.Mims TRIPLE resonance
experiment (see pulse sequence in Scheme ) at B = 1218 mT. The black
traces represent the (unsymmetrized) 13C TRIPLE experiment
with the pumping frequency RF1 off resonance
at the 13C Larmor frequency, i.e., equivalent to the 13C ENDOR spectrum at B = 1218 mT (see Figure ). The red traces
represent the 13C Mims TRIPLE experiment with the RF1 pumping
frequency tuned to one of the sharp ENDOR transitions. The “TRIPLE
effect” is indicated by the red asterisks.
DFT
Calculations
In order to obtain more insight into
the underlying mechanism of this spin polarization phenomenon, we
conducted DFT calculations using a [2Fe]H subcluster model
in which the (oxidized) [4Fe–4S]H subcluster (S = 0) is modeled by a protonated thiol (ethyl-SH) group
(Figure S5). The representative model is
called “A” due to the “axial” conformation
of the ADT–NH– moiety, with its proton pointing toward
Fed. Using this modeling level, previously referred to
as “S (small)”,[17,18] the magnitude and sign
of the experimental 13C-ADT HFIs for both carbon nuclei
could be best reproduced. In Figure S6 the
spin-density distribution of the (i) corresponding (see the DFT methods described in the SI) singly occupied molecular orbital (SOMO), (ii)
formally doubly occupied MOs (Total-SOMO), as well as (iii) that of all MOs (Total) of the binuclear subsite are displayed
with two contour values. A summary of these DFT results is presented
in Figure .
Figure 5
Top (a): Isosurfaces
of total spin density at the 5 × 10–4 a.u.
cutoff (corresponding to the Fermi contact HFI
term Aiso(13C) = 0.6 MHz) for the representative
HoxS = 1/2 DFT model Anative, showing positive (blue) density on the “right” 13C and negative (green) spin density on the “left” 13C nuclei. The model itself is shown in thin wire. Bottom
(b): View of DFT model Anative along the Fep–Fed axis displaying the orientation of the calculated
methylene 13C hyperfine tensors (Table S1). For extended information, see Figures S6 and S7.
Top (a): Isosurfaces
of total spin density at the 5 × 10–4 a.u.
cutoff (corresponding to the Fermi contact HFI
term Aiso(13C) = 0.6 MHz) for the representative
HoxS = 1/2 DFT model Anative, showing positive (blue) density on the “right” 13C and negative (green) spin density on the “left” 13C nuclei. The model itself is shown in thin wire. Bottom
(b): View of DFT model Anative along the Fep–Fed axis displaying the orientation of the calculated
methylene 13C hyperfine tensors (Table S1). For extended information, see Figures S6 and S7.Notably, the corresponding
SOMO has 74% contribution from the Fed 3d shell. It turns
out that the “left” methylenecarbon, i.e., the carbon on the same side as the distal terminal CO
ligand, has negative spin density due to spin polarization since the
SOMO has only a vanishing contribution on this atom. The “right”
carbon nucleus (on the same side as the distal CN– ligand) has positive spin density due to delocalization of the SOMO
onto this center. No other MOs noticeably contribute to the spin densities
at the two 13C nuclei. Although very small in their magnitude,
the calculated atomic spin populations at the two ADTcarbon nuclei
(Table S3) are nevertheless consistent
with the observed 13C HFI values. It is, therefore, tempting
to assume that this asymmetric spin distribution is associated with
the asymmetric ligand configuration at the distal iron center Fed. To verify this hypothesis, two isomeric DFT models were
investigated in which the positions of the CN– and
CO ligands were swapped at either Fep (“Ap-iso”) or Fed (“Ad-iso”),
see Figure S7. Obviously, swapping CN– ligands at both Fe sites creates a pseudomirror image
of the native [2Fe]H isomer (“Apd-iso”). A full mirror image can only be obtained if the protonation
position of the ethyl-SH ligand is also swapped. Exchanging the CN– and CO ligand at the proximal iron Fep did
not have an effect on the signs of the methylene 13C HFI.
However, swapping the terminal CN– and CO ligands
at the distal iron Fed changes the spin-polarization in
the ADT ligand (Table ). The behavior described is rationalized by the [Fe(II)pFe(I)d] electronic structure of the [2Fe]H subcluster
in the Hox state with its S = 1/2 spin
localization at the Fe(I)d distal iron site, while the
Fe(II)p proximal site remains low-spin.[19,20] Other investigated DFT models are “Enative”,
having the −NH– proton in its alternative “equatorial”
position pointing toward Fep,[21] and “Ad-rot” with CN– at Fed rotated to the position trans to the bridging CO ligand;[22] these two
models represent [2Fe]H subcluster structural alternatives
often discussed in the literature. While the two alternatives Enative and Ad-rot predict the same orientation
of the 13C-ADT HFI tensors as seen in Anative, they produce an inferior match to the experimental HFI values (Figure S7, Tables and S1). Interestingly,
all the above-described ‘A’ (axial) isomeric models
are found essentially equi-energetic within 1 kcal/mol, while the
‘E’ (equatorial) isomer is calculated +5 kcal/mol higher
in its energy. Two additional intersite ligand swap isomers studied
have both CN– ligands at either Fep (‘Ap-(CN)2’) or Fed (‘Ad-(CN)2’); these two structures are predicted to have significantly
higher (+123/129 kcal/mol) relative energies. Notably, placing two
negative CN– ligands at Fed in the Ad-(CN)2 isomer produces an inverted [Fe(I)pFe(II)d] oxidation pattern for the iron sites, having
Fep as the spin center (Table S2).The local CN–/CO ligand asymmetry at the
distal
iron site, which features the open coordination in the Hox state, seems to be the key to inducing the spin-polarization in
the ADT ligand. A further result of this asymmetry is the spin polarization
of the methylene protons as was observed in our paramagnetic NMR studies.[11] Since in our [2Fe]H precursor the
methylene protons have been labeled with 2H, we also performed 2H Mims ENDOR experiments at the three canonical field positions
(gx, gy, gz) (see Figure S8). Signals of up to three 2H nuclei could be observed and show hyperfine couplings up to 0.6
MHz. The signals are, however, much weaker than those of the 13C nuclei, which, currently, precludes the application of
a triple 2H ENDOR experiment.To address the question
of the relevance of the asymmetry in coordination
of the distal iron atom for the catalytic cycle, we investigated how
it influences the stabilization of the hydride-bound Hhyd-E state, which is formed from the 2e–-reduced (vs Hox), protonated HsredH+ state (see Figure ). We calculated the energetics for this process for three isomers:
the native configuration ‘A’ with one terminal CN– on each [2Fe]Hiron, ‘p-(CN)2’
with both CN– ligands coordinated at the proximal
iron, and ‘d-(CN)2’ with both CN– ligands
coordinating the distal iron (see Figures S7 and S9). Clearly, the non-native isomeric configurations are of
academic interest only since they do not occur in [FeFe] hydrogenase
and cannot be synthesized. Moreover, the relative energies of the
non-native isomers are around 130 kcal/mol higher than that of the
native configuration (Figure S9). Since
in our truncated model the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster
is absent, HsredH+ is indistinguishable from
HredH+. This also means that the models are
diamagnetic, and no magnetic effects can be modeled. Nevertheless,
it can be assumed that the thermodynamics of the Fed–H– hydride formation (i.e., the HsredH+-to-Hhyd-E intramolecular proton transfer
from the ADT–NH2+– bridgehead
to the distal iron) is well represented since the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster is unlikely to have a major impact on this process.
It should be noted that the hydride formation can involve a transition
from terminal CO in the H(s)redH+ state to bridging
CO in Hhyd (see Figures and S9). It is not clear
if this ligand rearrangement also occurs to its full extent in the
enzyme on the time scale of catalysis. For the ‘A’ native
and p-(CN)2 isomers, the Hhyd-E hydride formation
is predicted exothermic: ΔHnative = −3.4 kcal/mol, ΔHp-(CN)2 = −7.8 kcal/mol. For the d-(CN)2 isomer, the hydride formation
is endothermic, ΔHd-(CN)2 = +16.8 kcal/mol. For the p-(CN)2 model, the distal iron Fed has a lack of charge density (in the absence of CN– coordination), providing extra stabilization of the hydride. However,
model d-(CN)2 has excess charge density (with two CN– coordinating) at the distal iron, which prevents stabilization of
the hydride at Fed. The charge density is more equally
distributed over the two-iron core of [2Fe]H in the native
configuration and seems to provide the perfect compromise to sufficiently
stabilize the hydride state for fast catalysis yet not overstabilizing
it, in order to avoid formation of a thermodynamic sink, which would
strongly slow down the catalysis. We, therefore, conclude that the
asymmetry of the ligand coordination at Fed ensures a flat
energy landscape for the hydride formation and transfer during the
reversible catalytic cycle of [FeFe] hydrogenase. This finding significantly
advances the design strategies for artificial hydrogen conversion
catalysts: Apart from the ligand geometry, also the charge balance
at the catalytic iron center needs to be carefully controlled.
Authors: Constanze Sommer; Agnieszka Adamska-Venkatesh; Krzysztof Pawlak; James A Birrell; Olaf Rüdiger; Edward J Reijerse; Wolfgang Lubitz Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Patricia Rodríguez-Maciá; Krzysztof Pawlak; Olaf Rüdiger; Edward J Reijerse; Wolfgang Lubitz; James A Birrell Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Cindy C Pham; David W Mulder; Vladimir Pelmenschikov; Paul W King; Michael W Ratzloff; Hongxin Wang; Nakul Mishra; Esen E Alp; Jiyong Zhao; Michael Y Hu; Kenji Tamasaku; Yoshitaka Yoda; Stephen P Cramer Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Edward J Reijerse; Cindy C Pham; Vladimir Pelmenschikov; Ryan Gilbert-Wilson; Agnieszka Adamska-Venkatesh; Judith F Siebel; Leland B Gee; Yoshitaka Yoda; Kenji Tamasaku; Wolfgang Lubitz; Thomas B Rauchfuss; Stephen P Cramer Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Alexey Silakov; Eduard J Reijerse; Simon P J Albracht; E Claude Hatchikian; Wolfgang Lubitz Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-08-28 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Adrien Pagnier; Batuhan Balci; Eric M Shepard; Hao Yang; Douglas M Warui; Stella Impano; Squire J Booker; Brian M Hoffman; William E Broderick; Joan B Broderick Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 16.823
Authors: Vladimir Pelmenschikov; James A Birrell; Leland B Gee; Casseday P Richers; Edward J Reijerse; Hongxin Wang; Simon Arragain; Nakul Mishra; Yoshitaka Yoda; Hiroaki Matsuura; Lei Li; Kenji Tamasaku; Thomas B Rauchfuss; Wolfgang Lubitz; Stephen P Cramer Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 15.419