The active site of [FeFe] hydrogenase features a binuclear iron cofactor Fe2ADT(CO)3(CN)2, where ADT represents the bridging ligand aza-propane-dithiolate. The terminal diatomic ligands all coordinate in a basal configuration, and one CO bridges the two irons leaving an open coordination site at which the hydrogen species and the competitive inhibitor CO bind. Externally supplied CO is expected to coordinate in an apical configuration. However, an alternative configuration has been proposed in which, due to ligand rotation, the CN- bound to the distal Fe becomes apical. Using selective 13C isotope labeling of the CN- and COext ligands in combination with pulsed 13C electron-nuclear-nuclear triple resonance spectroscopy, spin polarization effects are revealed that, according to density functional theory calculations, are consistent with only the "unrotated" apical COext configuration.
The active site of [FeFe] hydrogenase features a binuclear ironcofactor Fe2ADT(CO)3(CN)2, where ADT represents the bridging ligand aza-propane-dithiolate. The terminal diatomic ligands all coordinate in a basal configuration, and one CO bridges the two irons leaving an open coordination site at which the hydrogen species and the competitive inhibitor CO bind. Externally supplied CO is expected to coordinate in an apical configuration. However, an alternative configuration has been proposed in which, due to ligand rotation, the CN- bound to the distal Fe becomes apical. Using selective 13C isotope labeling of the CN- and COext ligands in combination with pulsed 13C electron-nuclear-nuclear triple resonance spectroscopy, spin polarization effects are revealed that, according to density functional theory calculations, are consistent with only the "unrotated" apical COext configuration.
[FeFe] hydrogenases are the most active enzymes
catalyzing the
reversible conversion of protons and electrons into molecular hydrogen.[1] The active site of these enzymes is highly conserved
and is termed the “H-cluster” (see Figure ). It consists of a unique
binuclear ironcenter [2Fe]H coordinated by two terminal
CN– ligands and three CO ligands, one of which bridges
the two iron atoms. In addition, the two iron atoms are bridged by
an aza-propane-dithiolate ligand containing a secondary amine moiety
in its bridgehead. This amine acts as a proton shuttle connecting
the [2Fe]H cofactor to the proton channel of the enzyme.
The [2Fe]H cofactor is covalently linked to a generic [4Fe-4S]
cluster through the bridging thiol group of one of the coordinating
cysteines. This [4Fe-4S]H subcluster is part of the H-cluster
and connects the active site to the electron transport chain of the
enzyme. It is generally assumed that the oxidized state of the H-cluster,
“Hox”, is the entry point to the catalyticcycle.[2] Externally supplied CO acts as
a competitive inhibitor[3] of the enzyme
and binds to the open coordination site at the distal ironFed in the oxidized state forming the “Hox-CO”
state (Figure ).
Figure 1
Structure
of the H-cluster with coordinating protein residues according
to Protein Data Bank entry 4XDC (CpI from Clostridium pasteurianum).[4] COext is overlaid from
the structure of Protein Data Bank entry 1C4C.[5] “Fep” and “Fed” are the irons
proximal and distal to the [4Fe-4S]H subcluster, respectively.
Structure
of the H-cluster with coordinating protein residues according
to Protein Data Bank entry 4XDC (CpI from Clostridium pasteurianum).[4] COext is overlaid from
the structure of Protein Data Bank entry 1C4C.[5] “Fep” and “Fed” are the irons
proximal and distal to the [4Fe-4S]H subcluster, respectively.Both Hox and Hox-CO are paramagnetic
and
characterized by a mixed valence Fe(I)Fe(II) configuration of binuclear
subsite [2Fe]H. The characteristic axial electron paramagnetic
resonance (EPR) spectrum of Hox-CO is displayed in Figure a. It is generally
assumed that the extraneous CO of the Hox-CO state
binds in the open coordination site in an apical coordination.[1,6] Some spectroscopic data [Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and X-ray
emission spectroscopy] in combination with DFT/QM-MM analysis, however,
seem to suggest an alternative coordination in which the extraneous
CO rotates to the basal (equatorial) position and the distal CN– ligand adopts an apical (axial) coordination.[7−9] It is known from our previous studies that the H-cluster in its
Hox and Hox-CO states exhibits complex magnetic
interactions featuring extensive spin delocalization and polarization
over the ironcore[10] and limited amounts
of spin delocalization and polarization over its ligands.[11,12] Therefore, we investigated whether these magnetic interactions can
be used to distinguish apical versus basal coordination modes of the
CO/CN– ligands by focusing on the signs (positive
or negative) of their 13C electron–nuclear hyperfine
interactions (HFIs).
Figure 4
(A) EPR
spectrum of Hox-CO. (B) The black trace is the
Mims-TRIPLE spectrum of the 13CN–-labeled
H-cluster in the Hox-CO state (g∥, 1185 mT) with pumping pulse RF1 positioned off resonance at the 13C Larmor frequency. The red trace is from the same experiment
with RF1 positioned at 14.5 MHz (high-frequency line of the inner
doublet). The TRIPLE effect on the high-frequency line of the outer
doublet is denoted with an asterisk. The blue trace is the difference
spectrum (black minus red). (C) The black trace is the Davies TRIPLE
of the 13CN–- and 13COext-labeled H-cluster in the Hox-CO state (g⊥, 1209 mT) with pumping pulse RF1 positioned
off resonance at the 13C Larmor frequency. The dotted red
trace is from the same experiment with RF1 positioned at 11 MHz (low-frequency
line of the inner 13CN– doublet). The
TRIPLE effect on the low-frequency line of the outer 13CN– doublet as well as the high-frequency line
of the 13COext doublet is denoted with an asterisk.
The blue trace is the difference spectrum (black minus red). All spectra
were recorded at 17 K. Mims sequence: MW pulse = 20 ns, τ =
200 ns, and TRF = 60 μs. Davies
sequence: preparation pulse = 100 ns, π/2 pulse = 40 ns, τ
= 200 ns, and TRF = 60 μs.
To this end, we constructed several in silico molecular
models for each of the two CO/CN– configurations.
The simplest models in which the [4Fe-4S]2+ subcluster
is truncated to an SH-ethyl moiety are displayed in Figure . Extended models including
the [4Fe-4S]H subcluster as well as selected amino acid
side groups from the protein pocket are discussed in the Supporting Information. The quantum chemical
calculations on these extended models provide additional insights
into the electronic structure of the H-cluster but essentially predict
the same spin distribution over the [2Fe]H subcluster as
the small (truncated) models. Model S-COa represents the coordination
configuration in which the extraneous CO is coordinated in an apical
mode, while model S-COb represents the alternative basal coordination
of the extraneous CO ligand, i.e., with the CNd ligand
in apical coordination mode. These models are used in quantum chemical
calculations aimed at distinguishing these ligand configurations through
their effect on the magnitudes and signs of the magnetic parameters
of the H-cluster. The calculations were performed using ORCA 4.11
on the density functional theory (DFT) level and used the BP86 functional
and zora-def2-TZVP basis set for the geometry optimizations. EPR property
calculations were performed using the same basis set and the B3LYP
as well as the BP86 functional, including relativistic and dispersion
corrections (details in the Supporting Information).
Figure 2
DFT models. S-COa represents the apical coordination of COext, while S-COb depicts the basal coordination of COext.
DFT models. S-COa represents the apical coordination of COext, while S-COb depicts the basal coordination of COext.According to earlier DFT studies of the H-cluster,
both irons in
[2Fe]H have a distorted octahedral coordination geometry
and are in a low-spinconfiguration, while the spin density is mainly
concentrated on the ironcenters with smaller contributions on the
ligands.[13,14] For Hox-CO, both Fep and Fed contribute to the SOMO that mainly consists of
an antisymmetric linear combination of the d orbitals from both Fecenters.[13] Our quantum chemical calculations on both ligand configurations
(S-COa and S-COb) are fully consistent with the analysis of Fiedler
and Brunold[13] and provided, in addition,
the HFI values for the basal 13CO/13CN– ligands. Figure a shows the SOMO for model S-COa confirming that the carboncenters
of the basal CO/CN– ligands do not participate in
the SOMO. The SOMO for model S-COb is virtually identical to that
of S-COa (not shown). Figure b depicts the relevant spin populations on the selected Fe
and carboncenters. Indeed, the centers participating in the SOMO
(Fep, Fed, COb, and COext) have positive spin population. The spin population on the basal
CO/CN– carbons is negative due to “spin polarization”.
One can imagine that the Fe-CN– σ-bonds are
polarized by the magneticiron d-orbitals (participating in the SOMO)
in a manner similar to that of the proton σ-bonds in aromatic
radicals.[15]
Figure 3
(a) SOMO of model S-COa
that shows only density on COext. (b) Mulliken spin population
on the Fe centers and 13CO/13CN ligands. The
carbons of the basal ligands have
a negative spin population, while the carbon of the apical COext has a positive spin population.
(a) SOMO of model S-COa
that shows only density on COext. (b) Mulliken spin population
on the Fecenters and 13CO/13CN ligands. The
carbons of the basal ligands have
a negative spin population, while the carbon of the apical COext has a positive spin population.The calculated g tensor and HFIs of the 57Fe and 13C nuclei are listed in Table . All models predict negative isotropic HFIs
for the basal 13CO/13CN– ligands
(colored blue in Figure and Table ), while
the apical 13CO/13CN– ligand
has positive HFIs (colored red in Figure and Table ). This sign difference in basal versus apical HFI
allows us to experimentally distinguish the two proposed ligand configurations
for Hox-CO displayed in Figure .
Table 1
Experimental and
DFT-Predicted Magnetic
Parameters (isotropic 57Fe, 13C HFI in megahertz)
for Hox-CO with Apical and Basal COext (models
S-COa and S-COb)a
HFI Aiso values for apical and basal ligands are colored red and blue, respectively.
The experimental 57Fe HFIs are obtained from ref (19).
HFI Aiso values for apical and basal ligands are colored red and blue, respectively.
The experimental 57Fe HFIs are obtained from ref (19).The magnitudes of the 13C HFI values for
the CN– and CO ligands in the Hox-CO
state have
previously been experimentally determined (Table ), but their relative signs have not.[16−18] The two 13CN– couplings are on the
same order of magnitude (7.3 MHz vs 4.0 MHz) and seem to reflect the
relative spin populations on the two ironcenters (0.62 vs 0.24).
The 13C HFI of the extraneous CO is significantly larger
(17.1 MHz), which is consistent with the DFT predictions for conformation
“COa” (basal CN–). Overall, however,
the DFT calculations overestimate the magnitude of the 13CN– and 13CO HFI tensors. Interestingly,
the relative magnitudes of the 13CO/13CN– HFIs are better reproduced in the BP86 calculations
than for the B3LYP results. Overall, the trend reflected in the DFT
calculations clearly favors the conserved conformation in which the
extraneous CO binds and remains in an apical position on Fed.To further corroborate the assignment of Hox-CO
to conformation
“S-COa” with COext in the apical position,
we set out to determine the relative signs of the 13C HFI
tensors and performed electron–nuclear–nuclear triple
resonance (TRIPLE)[20] experiments (see the Supporting Information and Scheme S1) using Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CrHydA1) samples
obtained through artificial maturation with synthetic precursors labeled
with 13CN–[21,22] and inhibited
with either natural abundance CO or 13CO (see Figure S1 for FTIR spectra of the samples). In
a TRIPLE experiment, an additional stationary RF pulse is applied
during the regular Mims[23] or Davies sequence[24] (see the Supporting Information). If this pulse is resonant with one of the nuclear spin transitions,
the ENDOR efficiency of all nuclear spin transitions from the same
mS manifold is reduced. In the difference (off resonance
minus on resonance) spectrum, these transitions show up as (weak)
positive contributions. For 13C nuclei (I = 1/2), the observed ENDOR transitions are
given as νENDOR = νI + mIA, resulting in a ν± = νI ± A/2 doublet. Transitions
with a TRIPLE effect on the same side of the doublet as the pumped
transition (i.e., both larger or both smaller than the center frequency)
belong to nuclear spins having an HFI with the same sign as the pumped
nucleus. If a TRIPLE effect occurs on the opposite branch of the doublet,
the HFI signs are opposite. Figure B presents a Mims
TRIPLE experiment on (13CN–)2-labeled CrHydA1. The spectra show the two 13C doublets of similar HFI splitting originating from the
two CN– ligands. The standard Mims ENDOR spectrum[23] is colored black but is partly hidden by the
overlaid TRIPLE experiment indicated as a red dotted line. The regular
ENDOR spectrum is obtained by setting the additional RF1 pulse off
resonance [in this case at ν(13C) = 13 MHz]. In the
TRIPLE experiment, the additional RF1 pumping pulse was applied at
the high-frequency line of the inner doublet (indicated by the red
arrow). From the difference spectrum (colored blue, i.e., the black
minus the red spectrum), it can be seen that only the high-frequency
line of the outer doublet is affected (slightly reduced in intensity).
This signifies that the HFIs of the two 13C doublets have
the same sign, which is consistent with configuration “S-COa”.(A) EPR
spectrum of Hox-CO. (B) The black trace is the
Mims-TRIPLE spectrum of the 13CN–-labeled
H-cluster in the Hox-CO state (g∥, 1185 mT) with pumping pulse RF1 positioned off resonance at the 13C Larmor frequency. The red trace is from the same experiment
with RF1 positioned at 14.5 MHz (high-frequency line of the inner
doublet). The TRIPLE effect on the high-frequency line of the outer
doublet is denoted with an asterisk. The blue trace is the difference
spectrum (black minus red). (C) The black trace is the Davies TRIPLE
of the 13CN–- and 13COext-labeled H-cluster in the Hox-CO state (g⊥, 1209 mT) with pumping pulse RF1 positioned
off resonance at the 13C Larmor frequency. The dotted red
trace is from the same experiment with RF1 positioned at 11 MHz (low-frequency
line of the inner 13CN– doublet). The
TRIPLE effect on the low-frequency line of the outer 13CN– doublet as well as the high-frequency line
of the 13COext doublet is denoted with an asterisk.
The blue trace is the difference spectrum (black minus red). All spectra
were recorded at 17 K. Mims sequence: MW pulse = 20 ns, τ =
200 ns, and TRF = 60 μs. Davies
sequence: preparation pulse = 100 ns, π/2 pulse = 40 ns, τ
= 200 ns, and TRF = 60 μs.To verify that the 13C HFI of the extraneous
CO ligand
has a different sign from the two CN– ligands, we
performed a Davies TRIPLE experiment on a CrHydA1
preparation in which 13CN–-labeled Hox was exposed to 13CO gas in the dark (to prevent
CO scrambling). The Davies ENDOR experiment is better suited for relatively
large hyperfine interactions like the one observed for the extraneous 13CO. By choosing a long (selective) preparation pulse, we
could also observe the weaker coupling from the 13CN– ligands. The resulting spectra (Figure C) show, in addition to the two 13CN– doublets, the high-frequency line of the 13COext ligand at 23.5 MHz. The low-frequency line
at 7 MHz is not displayed because its intensity is significantly lower,
which makes it unfavorable to observe the “triple effect”
(see below). In the Davies TRIPLE experiment, the RF1 pumping pulse
was set to the low-frequency line of the inner 13CN– doublet. From the difference spectrum colored blue,
one can see that now the “triple effect” occurs on the
low-frequency line of the 13CN– outer
doublet as well as on the high-frequency line of the 13COext ligand. This confirms the Mims TRIPLE result that
the two 13CN– ligand HFIs have the same
sign. Additionally, the Davies TRIPLE shows that the sign of the 13COext HFI is opposite to that of the two 13CN– ligands.It is, therefore, concluded
that the observed magnitude and signs
of the 13C ligand HFIs are consistent only with DFT model
“S-COa” (apical COext) and not with DFT model
“S-COb” (basal COext). The “unrotated”
structure was also proposed in the original crystallographic study
of Hox-CO.[6] Here, illumination
at low temperatures exposed the photolability of the COext ligand leading to formation of the Hox state.One possibility is that the distal CN– ligand
coordinates in the apical position only at room temperature where
most published FTIR spectra were measured while at low temperatures
(where our EPR and ENDOR spectra are recorded) it, somehow, rearranges
to a basal position. As observed by Roseboom et al.[25] for the [FeFe] hydrogenase from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, the FTIR spectrum of Hox-CO is temperature-independent
between 15 K and room temperature, and thus, a temperature-dependent
ligand rearrangement is highly unlikely. In the available crystal
structures (see Figure b), the CN– bound to the distal iron atom is hydrogen
bonded to a lysine residue as well as a backbone amide. These interactions
can be expected to exert a significant kinetic barrier preventing
ligand rotation already at room temperature, thus stabilizing the
open coordination site in the Hox state. The fact that
externally supplied 13CO (in the dark) is not scrambled
to give 13CO in the basal and bridging positions further
supports this notion. We can, therefore, conclude that at all temperatures
the Hox-CO state is characterized by an extraneous CO ligand
that is positioned in an apical coordination with respect to Fed.The rigidity of the CO/CN– coordination
configuration
in the H-cluster was recently demonstrated in studies of its reduced
states (Hred and Hsred), showing that the bridging
CO ligand is retained under all circumstances.[26,27] While some groups[7−9] proposed that the H-cluster structure allows for
extensive ligand dynamics and rotation, potentially leading to the
formation of inactive configurations containing bridging hydrides
and rotated (apical) CO ligands, the former studies as well as our
study clearly show that the CO and CN– ligand configuration
is rigid and stabilized by H-bonds. This ensures minimal reorganization
energy during the catalyticcycle.Overall, we have demonstrated
how advanced EPR spectroscopic techniques
such as TRIPLE can be extremely useful in investigating the ligand
structure around the metalcenter at the active site of the [FeFe]
hydrogenase. This technique can potentially be applied to numerous
other enzymes as well as molecular catalysts to gain more detailed
insight into their mechanism of action.
Authors: Constanze Sommer; Agnieszka Adamska-Venkatesh; Krzysztof Pawlak; James A Birrell; Olaf Rüdiger; Edward J Reijerse; Wolfgang Lubitz Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Agnieszka Adamska-Venkatesh; Souvik Roy; Judith F Siebel; Trevor R Simmons; Marc Fontecave; Vincent Artero; Edward Reijerse; Wolfgang Lubitz Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Alexey Silakov; Eduard J Reijerse; Simon P J Albracht; E Claude Hatchikian; Wolfgang Lubitz Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-08-28 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: William K Myers; Troy A Stich; Daniel L M Suess; Jon M Kuchenreuther; James R Swartz; R David Britt Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: J Esselborn; N Muraki; K Klein; V Engelbrecht; N Metzler-Nolte; U-P Apfel; E Hofmann; G Kurisu; T Happe Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: James A Birrell; Vladimir Pelmenschikov; Nakul Mishra; Hongxin Wang; Yoshitaka Yoda; Kenji Tamasaku; Thomas B Rauchfuss; Stephen P Cramer; Wolfgang Lubitz; Serena DeBeer Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Sven T Stripp; Benjamin R Duffus; Vincent Fourmond; Christophe Léger; Silke Leimkühler; Shun Hirota; Yilin Hu; Andrew Jasniewski; Hideaki Ogata; Markus W Ribbe Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 72.087