Literature DB >> 26991346

Strong sexual selection in males against a mutation load that reduces offspring production in seed beetles.

K Grieshop1, J Stångberg1, I Martinossi-Allibert1, G Arnqvist1, D Berger1.   

Abstract

Theory predicts that sexual reproduction can increase population viability relative to asexual reproduction by allowing sexual selection in males to remove deleterious mutations from the population without large demographic costs. This requires that selection acts more strongly in males than females and that mutations affecting male reproductive success have pleiotropic effects on population productivity, but empirical support for these assumptions is mixed. We used the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus to implement a three-generation breeding design where we induced mutations via ionizing radiation (IR) in the F0 generation and measured mutational effects (relative to nonirradiated controls) on an estimate of population productivity in the F1 and effects on sex-specific competitive lifetime reproductive success (LRS) in the F2 . Regardless of whether mutations were induced via F0 males or females, they had strong negative effects on male LRS, but a nonsignificant influence on female LRS, suggesting that selection is more efficient in removing deleterious alleles in males. Moreover, mutations had seemingly shared effects on population productivity and competitive LRS in both sexes. Thus, our results lend support to the hypothesis that strong sexual selection on males can act to remove the mutation load on population viability, thereby offering a benefit to sexual reproduction.
© 2016 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2016 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; genetic correlation; intralocus sexual conflict; pleiotropy; population viability; sexual antagonism; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26991346     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  13 in total

1.  Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Kevin E Kwok; Christopher S Angell; Howard D Rundle; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  No evidence of positive assortative mating for genetic quality in fruit flies.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sex differences in deleterious mutational effects in Drosophila melanogaster: combining quantitative and population genetic insights.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon; Max Reuter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Elevated temperature increases genome-wide selection on de novo mutations.

Authors:  David Berger; Josefine Stångberg; Julian Baur; Richard J Walters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Male-benefit sexually antagonistic genotypes show elevated vulnerability to inbreeding.

Authors:  Karl Grieshop; David Berger; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Sex-specific dominance reversal of genetic variation for fitness.

Authors:  Karl Grieshop; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Sexual selection, environmental robustness, and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles.

Authors:  Ivain Martinossi-Allibert; Emma Thilliez; Göran Arnqvist; David Berger
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Direct and indirect effects of male genital elaboration in female seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Karl Grieshop; Cosima Hotzy; Johanna Rönn; Michal Polak; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Lineages evolved under stronger sexual selection show superior ability to invade conspecific competitor populations.

Authors:  Joanne L Godwin; Lewis G Spurgin; Łukasz Michalczyk; Oliver Y Martin; Alyson J Lumley; Tracey Chapman; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2018-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.