Literature DB >> 20560928

Sperm competition and ejaculate economics.

Geoff A Parker1, Tommaso Pizzari.   

Abstract

Sperm competition was identified in 1970 as a pervasive selective force in post-copulatory sexual selection that occurs when the ejaculates of different males compete to fertilise a given set of ova. Since then, sperm competition has been much studied both empirically and theoretically. Because sperm competition often favours large ejaculates, an important challenge has been to understand the evolution of strategies through which males invest in sperm production and economise sperm allocation to maximise reproductive success under competitive conditions. Sperm competition mechanisms vary greatly, depending on many factors including the level of sperm competition, space constraints in the sperm competition arena, male mating roles, and female influences on sperm utilisation. Consequently, theoretical models of ejaculate economics are complex and varied, often with apparently conflicting predictions. The goal of this review is to synthesise the theoretical basis of ejaculate economics under sperm competition, aiming to provide empiricists with categorised model assumptions and predictions. We show that apparent contradictions between older and newer models can often be reconciled and there is considerable consensus in the predictions generated by different models. We also discuss qualitative empirical support for some of these predictions, and detail quantitative matches between predictions and observations that exist in the yellow dung fly. We argue that ejaculate economic theory represents a powerful heuristic to explain the diversity in ejaculate traits at multiple levels: across species, across males and within individual males. Future progress requires greater understanding of sperm competition mechanisms, quantification of trade-offs between ejaculate allocation and numbers of matings gained, further knowledge of mechanisms of female sperm selection and their associated costs, further investigation of non-sperm ejaculate effects, and theoretical integration of pre- and post-copulatory episodes of sexual selection.
© 2010 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2010 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20560928     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00140.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  150 in total

1.  Female reproductive tract form drives the evolution of complex sperm morphology.

Authors:  Dawn M Higginson; Kelly B Miller; Kari A Segraves; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Individual plastic responses by males to rivals reveal mismatches between behaviour and fitness outcomes.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; James D Westmancoat; Matthew J G Gage; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Female major histocompatibility complex type affects male testosterone levels and sperm number in the horse (Equus caballus).

Authors:  D Burger; G Dolivo; E Marti; H Sieme; C Wedekind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A weapons-testes trade-off in males is amplified in female traits.

Authors:  Christine W Miller; Paul N Joseph; Rebecca M Kilner; Zachary Emberts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sperm competition accentuates selection on ejaculate attributes.

Authors:  Pauline Vuarin; Yves Hingrat; Loïc Lesobre; Michel Saint Jalme; Frédéric Lacroix; Gabriele Sorci
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems.

Authors:  Mikael Puurtinen; Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Geographical variation in sexual behavior and body traits in a sex role reversed wolf spider.

Authors:  Fedra Bollatti; Virginia Garcia Diaz; Alfredo V Peretti; Anita Aisenberg
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-04-10

9.  Genetic trade-offs between male reproductive traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  David C S Filice; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  The seminal symphony: how to compose an ejaculate.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Laura Sirot; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 17.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.