| Literature DB >> 31569451 |
Mohamed A Morsy1,2, Sumeet Gupta3, Anroop B Nair4, Katharigatta N Venugopala5,6, Khaled Greish7, Mahmoud El-Daly8.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease is a multifactorial inflammatory condition. This study aimed to test the protective effects of Spirulina platensis against ulcerative colitis (UC). UC was induced in thirty-six male Wistar rats by adding dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) to their drinking water, while a control group received only drinking water. UC rats were equally-divided into six groups that received a single oral daily dose of vehicle (DSS), sulfasalazine (SSZ, 50 mg/kg/day), chloroform or the hydroalcoholic extracts of Spirulina platensis (100 or 200 mg/kg/day) for 15 days, and then blood and colon samples were harvested for determination of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and histopathology. At the end of the study, compared to time-matched controls, UC rats showed increased TNF-α (1.64-fold), IL-6 (5.73-fold), ESR (3.18-fold), and MPO (1.61-fold), along with loss of body weight (24.73%) and disease activity index (1.767 ± 0.216 vs. 0 ± 0), p < 0.001. These effects were prevented by SSZ treatment (p < 0.001 vs. DSS). The hydroalcoholic extract of Spirulina platensis dose-dependently modulated all DSS-induced inflammatory changes. However, the chloroform extract significantly lowered only IL-6 and ESR, but not TNF-α or MPO levels. The protective effects of the hydroalcoholic extract of Spirulina platensis against experimental UC involved mitigation of DSS-induced inflammation.Entities:
Keywords: Spirulina platensis; dextran sulfate sodium; interleukin-6; myeloperoxidase; tumor necrosis factor-α; ulcerative colitis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31569451 PMCID: PMC6836255 DOI: 10.3390/nu11102309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Results of high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) analysis of Spirulina platensis hydroalcoholic extract. Upper panel: Fingerprint profile of the developed plate showing the band for carotenoids. Lower panel: UV spectra of the isolated carotenoids. The green line represents the spectrum of a standard carotenoid sample (β-carotene), while the black lines represent the spectra of samples recovered from the HPTLC bands (red rectangle in the upper panel).
Figure 2Chromatograph of the given sample run in the gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.
Chemical nature of the compounds identified in Spirulina platensis hydroalcoholic extract using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.
| Chemical Nature | Total Number |
|---|---|
| Amino acids | 4 |
| Secondary metabolites | 3 |
| Organic acids | 7 |
| Terpenes | 1 |
| Fatty acids | 5 |
| Others | 4 |
Compounds identified in Spirulina platensis hydroalcoholic extract using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.
| Compound Name | RT | TMS Derivative | KEGG ID/Chem ID | Qualification Ions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Methylamine | 7.973 | 2 TMS | C00218 | 175, 160 |
|
| 4-Hydroxybutanoic acid | 8.451 | 2 TMS | C01089 | 248, 247 |
|
| L-Alanine | 9.474 | 1 TMS | C00041 | 161, 146 |
|
| Ethylene glycol | 10.296 | 2 TMS | C01380 | 206, 191 |
|
| Dimethylglycine | 10.456 | 1 TMS | C01026 | 175, 160 |
|
| L-Valine | 11.705 | 2 TMS | C00183 | 261, 246 |
|
| Lactic acid | 11.806 | 2 TMS | C00186 | 234, 219 |
|
| Acetic acid | 12.142 | 2 TMS | C00033 | 220, 205 |
|
| Glycerol | 12.754 | 3 TMS | C00116 | 308, 293 |
|
| Succinic acid | 14.147 | 2 TMS | C00042 | 262, 247 |
|
| Glyceric acid | 14.558 | 3 TMS | C00258 | 322, 307 |
|
| Uracil | 14.801 | 2 TMS | C00106 | 256, 255 |
|
| L-Isoleucine | 15.799 | 2 TMS | C00407 | 275, 260 |
|
| Phenylacetic acid | 16.059 | 1 TMS | C07086 | 208, 193 |
|
| Butanoic acid | 16.881 | 3 TMS | C00246 | 336, 321 |
|
| Erythronic acid | 18.811 | 4 TMS | 2781043 | 424, 409 |
|
| Pyrogallol | 19.993 | 3 TMS | C01108 | 342, 327 |
|
| p-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid | 20.539 | 2 TMS | C00642 | 296, 281 |
|
| Myristic acid | 22.82 | 1 TMS | C06424 | 300, 385 |
|
| Palmitelaidic acid | 24.666 | 1 TMS | 5282745 | 326, 311 |
|
| Palmitic acid | 24.892 | 1 TMS | C00249 | 328, 313 |
|
| 10-Heptadecenoic acid | 25.689 | 1 TMS | C00249 | 340, 325 |
|
| Phytol | 26.167 | 1 TMS | C01389 | 368, 353 |
|
| Linoleic acid | 26.822 | 1 TMS | C01595 | 352, 337 |
Effect of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis (UC) on body weights of rats and its modulation by various treatments.1
| Day | Positive (DSS) | Normal | Standard (SSZ) | Chloroform (Low) | Chloroform (High) | HA (Low) | HA (High) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 220.33 ± 8.64 | 224.83 ± 10.26 | 217.50 ± 4.90 | 226.41 ± 14.67 | 231.52 ± 7.25 | 229.83 ± 8.62 | 226.54 ± 6.88 |
|
| 198.50 ± 7.69 c | 230.25 ± 7.08 a | 206.67 ± 7.03 | 208.00 ± 8.92 b | 220.13 ± 6.17 a | 220.83 ± 6.56 a | 228.83 ± 3.94 a |
|
| 174.00 ± 5.71 cd | 231.17 ± 5.83 a | 211.83 ± 8.42 a | 197.33 ± 8.18 ab | 215.33 ± 5.12 a | 222.50 ± 6.49 a | 229.96 ± 7.81 a |
1 Animals were weighed (g) before the start of the experiment (Day 1) and on Days 8 and 15. The data (mean ± SD) obtained from various groups were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. a: p < 0.001 compared to positive (DSS) group at the same day; b: p < 0.05; c: p < 0.001 compared to Day 1 in the same group; d: p < 0.001 compared to Day 8 in the same group. Low and high are 100 and 200 mg/kg of Spirulina platensis extracts. HA: Hydroalcoholic; SSZ: Sulfasalazine.
Figure 3Disease activity index (DAI). DAI in all groups was calculated according to the formula: DAI = (combined score of weight loss, stool consistency, and bleeding)/3. Data (mean ± SD, n = 6) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.01 compared to dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) alone at all days except Days 1 and 3 (ns), ** p < 0.0001 comparison between the specified groups and DSS alone at all of the studied time points except at Day 1 (ns) and Day 3 (p < 0.05 between DSS and the high dose hydroalcoholic extract alone). a: p < 0.01 and b: p < 0.05 compared to the low dose hydroalcoholic extract. ns: not significant.
Effect of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis (UC) and various treatments on blood inflammatory markers.
| Parameter | Positive (DSS) | Normal Control | Standard (SSZ) | Chloroform (Low) | Chloroform (High) | HA (Low) | HA (High) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.2 ± 0.118 # | 1.33 ± 0.124 | 1.14 ± 0.103 | 1.83 ± 0.115 *abc | 1.74 ± 0.154 *abc | 1.41 ± 0.136 | 1.16 ± 0.119 b |
|
| 7.09 ± 0.187 # | 1.24 ± 0.116 | 1.79 ± 0.127 * | 5.20 ± 0.124 *ab | 3.11 ± 0.153 *ab | 2.07 ± 0.138 * | 1.68 ± 0.104 *b |
|
| 8.61 ± 0.93 | 2.71 ± 0.55 d | 5.04 ± 0.53 d | 5.79 ± 1.76 e | 5.55 ± 1.86 fg | 6.08 ± 1.47 eh | 3.72 ± 1.36 dg |
TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6: interleukin-6, ESR: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Normal control: vehicle-treated normal animals, DSS: dextran sulfate sodium positive control, SSZ: animals received DSS + sulfasalazine, Chloroform (low): animals received DSS + small dose of chloroform extract of Spirulina platensis, Chloroform (high): animals received DSS + high dose of chloroform extract of Spirulina platensis, HA (low): animals received DSS + small dose of hydroalcoholic extract of Spirulina platensis, HA (high): animals received DSS + high dose of hydroalcoholic extract of Spirulina platensis. Data (mean ± SD, n=6) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. # p < 0.001 compared with all other groups; * p < 0.001 compared with control group; a p < 0.01 compared with SSZ group; b p < 0.05 compared to low dose HA extract; c p < 0.05 compared to high dose HA extract; d p < 0.001, e p < 0.05, f p < 0.01 compared to DSS group; g p < 0.01, h p < 0.05 compared to the control group.
Effect of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis (UC) and various treatments on tissue myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity.
| Parameter | Positive (DSS) | Normal Control | Standard (SSZ) | Chloroform (Low) | Chloroform (High) | HA (Low) | HA (High) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 40.50 ± 2.46 a | 25.23 ± 2.37 | 20.48 ± 2.68 # | 37.18 ± 2.62 ##@@ | 33.07 ± 2.88 ##@@ | 26.53 ± 1.92 @b | 24.00 ± 1.98 b |
Normal control: vehicle-treated normal animals, DSS: dextran sulfate sodium positive control, SSZ: animals received DSS + sulfasalazine, Chloroform (low): animals received DSS + small dose of chloroform extract of Spirulina platensis, Chloroform (high): animals received DSS + high dose of chloroform extract of Spirulina platensis, HA (low): animals received DSS + small dose of hydroalcoholic extract of Spirulina platensis, HA (high): animals received DSS + high dose of hydroalcoholic extract of Spirulina platensis. Data (mean ± SD, n = 6) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. a p < 0.001 compared with all other groups; # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.001 compared to control group. @ p < 0.01 and @@ p < 0.001 compared to SSZ group; b p < 0.001 compared to the chloroform extract doses.
Figure 4Representative photomicrographs of the colon sections after H&E staining. Control: vehicle-treated normal animals, DSS: dextran sulfate sodium positive control, SSZ: animals received DSS + sulfasalazine, SP-C-L: animals received DSS + small dose of chloroform extract of Spirulina platensis, SP-C-H: animals received DSS + high dose of chloroform extract of Spirulina platensis, SP-HA-L: animals received DSS + small dose of hydroalcoholic extract of Spirulina platensis, SP-HA-H: animals received DSS + high dose of hydroalcoholic extract of Spirulina platensis.