Literature DB >> 31562567

Using crop growth model stress covariates and AMMI decomposition to better predict genotype-by-environment interactions.

R Rincent1,2, M Malosetti3, B Ababaei4,5, G Touzy6,7,8,9, A Mini6, M Bogard8, P Martre4, J Le Gouis6,7, F van Eeuwijk3.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: We propose new methods to predict genotype × environment interaction by selecting relevant environmental covariates and using an AMMI decomposition of the interaction. Farmers are asked to produce more efficiently and to reduce their inputs in the context of climate change. They have to face more and more limiting factors that can combine in numerous stress scenarios. One solution to this challenge is to develop varieties adapted to specific environmental stress scenarios. For this, plant breeders can use genomic predictions coupled with environmental characterization to identify promising combinations of genes in relation to stress covariates. One way to do it is to take into account the genetic similarity between varieties and the similarity between environments within a mixed model framework. Molecular markers and environmental covariates (EC) can be used to estimate relevant covariance matrices. In the present study, based on a multi-environment trial of 220 European elite winter bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties phenotyped in 42 environments, we compared reference regression models potentially including ECs, and proposed alternative models to increase prediction accuracy. We showed that selecting a subset of ECs, and estimating covariance matrices using an AMMI decomposition to benefit from the information brought by the phenotypic records of the training set are promising approaches to better predict genotype-by-environment interactions (G ×  E). We found that using a different kinship for the main genetic effect and the G ×  E effect increased prediction accuracy. Our study also demonstrates that integrative stress indexes simulated by crop growth models are more efficient to capture G ×  E than climatic covariates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31562567     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-019-03432-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  17 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions.

Authors:  Nicolas Heslot; Deniz Akdemir; Mark E Sorrells; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Environment characterization as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype-environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australia.

Authors:  K Chenu; M Cooper; G L Hammer; K L Mathews; M F Dreccer; S C Chapman
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  LASSO with cross-validation for genomic selection.

Authors:  M Graziano Usai; Mike E Goddard; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein.

Authors:  Senthold Asseng; Pierre Martre; Andrea Maiorano; Reimund P Rötter; Garry J O'Leary; Glenn J Fitzgerald; Christine Girousse; Rosella Motzo; Francesco Giunta; M Ali Babar; Matthew P Reynolds; Ahmed M S Kheir; Peter J Thorburn; Katharina Waha; Alex C Ruane; Pramod K Aggarwal; Mukhtar Ahmed; Juraj Balkovič; Bruno Basso; Christian Biernath; Marco Bindi; Davide Cammarano; Andrew J Challinor; Giacomo De Sanctis; Benjamin Dumont; Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei; Elias Fereres; Roberto Ferrise; Margarita Garcia-Vila; Sebastian Gayler; Yujing Gao; Heidi Horan; Gerrit Hoogenboom; R César Izaurralde; Mohamed Jabloun; Curtis D Jones; Belay T Kassie; Kurt-Christian Kersebaum; Christian Klein; Ann-Kristin Koehler; Bing Liu; Sara Minoli; Manuel Montesino San Martin; Christoph Müller; Soora Naresh Kumar; Claas Nendel; Jørgen Eivind Olesen; Taru Palosuo; John R Porter; Eckart Priesack; Dominique Ripoche; Mikhail A Semenov; Claudio Stöckle; Pierre Stratonovitch; Thilo Streck; Iwan Supit; Fulu Tao; Marijn Van der Velde; Daniel Wallach; Enli Wang; Heidi Webber; Joost Wolf; Liujun Xiao; Zhao Zhang; Zhigan Zhao; Yan Zhu; Frank Ewert
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Increased prediction accuracy in wheat breeding trials using a marker × environment interaction genomic selection model.

Authors:  Marco Lopez-Cruz; Jose Crossa; David Bonnett; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jesse Poland; Jean-Luc Jannink; Ravi P Singh; Enrique Autrique; Gustavo de los Campos
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data.

Authors:  Diego Jarquín; José Crossa; Xavier Lacaze; Philippe Du Cheyron; Joëlle Daucourt; Josiane Lorgeou; François Piraux; Laurent Guerreiro; Paulino Pérez; Mario Calus; Juan Burgueño; Gustavo de los Campos
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Optimization of multi-environment trials for genomic selection based on crop models.

Authors:  R Rincent; E Kuhn; H Monod; F-X Oury; M Rousset; V Allard; J Le Gouis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Phenomic Selection Is a Low-Cost and High-Throughput Method Based on Indirect Predictions: Proof of Concept on Wheat and Poplar.

Authors:  Renaud Rincent; Jean-Paul Charpentier; Patricia Faivre-Rampant; Etienne Paux; Jacques Le Gouis; Catherine Bastien; Vincent Segura
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  12 in total

1.  Building a Calibration Set for Genomic Prediction, Characteristics to Be Considered, and Optimization Approaches.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: prediction of the genotype-by-environment interaction in multi-environment breeding trials.

Authors:  Pauline Robert; Ellen Goudemand; Jérôme Auzanneau; François-Xavier Oury; Bernard Rolland; Emmanuel Heumez; Sophie Bouchet; Antoine Caillebotte; Tristan Mary-Huard; Jacques Le Gouis; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.574

3.  Overview of Genomic Prediction Methods and the Associated Assumptions on the Variance of Marker Effect, and on the Architecture of the Target Trait.

Authors:  Réka Howard; Diego Jarquin; José Crossa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Genome and Environment Based Prediction Models and Methods of Complex Traits Incorporating Genotype × Environment Interaction.

Authors:  José Crossa; Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Germano Costa-Neto; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Rodomiro Ortiz; Johannes W R Martini; Morten Lillemo; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquin; Flavio Breseghello; Jaime Cuevas; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  The Modern Plant Breeding Triangle: Optimizing the Use of Genomics, Phenomics, and Enviromics Data.

Authors:  Jose Crossa; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Osval A Montesinos-Lopez; Germano Costa-Neto; Susanne Dreisigacker; Abelardo Montesinos-Lopez; Alison R Bentley
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Assessment of genomic prediction reliability and optimization of experimental designs in multi-environment trials.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Deniz Akdemir; Tiago Carvalho; Julio Isidro Y Sánchez
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 7.  Small spaces, big impacts: contributions of micro-environmental variation to population persistence under climate change.

Authors:  Derek A Denney; M Inam Jameel; Jordan B Bemmels; Mia E Rochford; Jill T Anderson
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.276

8.  Wheat individual grain-size variance originates from crop development and from specific genetic determinism.

Authors:  Aurore Beral; Renaud Rincent; Jacques Le Gouis; Christine Girousse; Vincent Allard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Breeding for Economically and Environmentally Sustainable Wheat Varieties: An Integrated Approach from Genomics to Selection.

Authors:  Etienne Paux; Stéphane Lafarge; François Balfourier; Jérémy Derory; Gilles Charmet; Michael Alaux; Geoffrey Perchet; Marion Bondoux; Frédéric Baret; Romain Barillot; Catherine Ravel; Pierre Sourdille; Jacques Le Gouis
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17

10.  MegaLMM: Mega-scale linear mixed models for genomic predictions with thousands of traits.

Authors:  Daniel E Runcie; Jiayi Qu; Hao Cheng; Lorin Crawford
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.