Literature DB >> 31561247

Blind deconvolution in model-based iterative reconstruction for CT using a normalized sparsity measure.

Lorenz Hehn1, Steven Tilley, Franz Pfeiffer, J Webster Stayman.   

Abstract

Model-based iterative reconstruction techniques for CT that include a description of the noise statistics and a physical forward model of the image formation process have proven to increase image quality for many applications. Specifically, including models of the system blur into the physical forward model and thus implicitly performing a deconvolution of the projections during tomographic reconstruction, could demonstrate distinct improvements, especially in terms of resolution. However, the results strongly rely on an exact characterization of all components contributing to the system blur. Such characterizations can be laborious and even a slight mismatch can diminish image quality significantly. Therefore, we introduce a novel objective function, which enables us to jointly estimate system blur parameters during tomographic reconstruction. Conventional objective functions are biased in terms of blur and can yield lowest cost to blurred reconstructions with low noise levels. A key feature of our objective function is a new normalized sparsity measure for CT based on total-variation regularization, constructed to be less biased in terms of blur. We outline a solving strategy for jointly recovering low-dimensional blur parameters during tomographic reconstruction. We perform an extensive simulation study, evaluating the performance of the regularization and the dependency of the different parts of the objective function on the blur parameters. Scenarios with different regularization strengths and system blurs are investigated, demonstrating that we can recover the blur parameter used for the simulations. The proposed strategy is validated and the dependency of the objective function with the number of iterations is analyzed. Finally, our approach is experimentally validated on test-bench data of a human wrist phantom, where the estimated blur parameter coincides well with visual inspection. Our findings are not restricted to attenuation-based CT and may facilitate the recovery of more complex imaging model parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31561247      PMCID: PMC6936101          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab489e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

1.  Incorporation of system resolution compensation (RC) in the ordered-subset transmission (OSTR) algorithm for transmission imaging in SPECT.

Authors:  Bing Feng; Jeffrey A Fessler; Michael A King
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Thibault; Ken D Sauer; Charles A Bouman; Jiang Hsieh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise transfer characteristics of flat-panel cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Daniel J Tward; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Penalized-Likelihood Reconstruction With High-Fidelity Measurement Models for High-Resolution Cone-Beam Imaging.

Authors:  Steven Tilley; Matthew Jacobson; Qian Cao; Michael Brehler; Alejandro Sisniega; Wojciech Zbijewski; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Understanding Blind Deconvolution Algorithms.

Authors:  Anat Levin; Yair Weiss; Fredo Durand; William T Freeman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  Noise correlation in CBCT projection data and its application for noise reduction in low-dose CBCT.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Luo Ouyang; Jianhua Ma; Jing Huang; Wufan Chen; Jing Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization.

Authors:  Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Model-based iterative reconstruction for flat-panel cone-beam CT with focal spot blur, detector blur, and correlated noise.

Authors:  Steven Tilley; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Modelling the physics in the iterative reconstruction for transmission computed tomography.

Authors:  Johan Nuyts; Bruno De Man; Jeffrey A Fessler; Wojciech Zbijewski; Freek J Beekman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Does iterative reconstruction lower CT radiation dose: evaluation of 15,000 examinations.

Authors:  Peter B Noël; Bernhard Renger; Martin Fiebich; Daniela Münzel; Alexander A Fingerle; Ernst J Rummeny; Martin Dobritz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.