Literature DB >> 31553463

Assessment of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ziyu Li1, Fei Shan1, Xiangji Ying1, Yan Zhang1, Jian-Yu E2, Yinkui Wang1, Hui Ren1, Xiangqian Su1, Jiafu Ji1.   

Abstract

Importance: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are increasingly used to treat locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic procedure after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remain unclear. Objective: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received either laparoscopic distal gastrectomy or open distal gastrectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between April 23, 2015, and November 16, 2017, a phase 2, open-label, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Gastrointestinal Cancer Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute in Beijing, China. Patients (n = 96) between 18 and 80 years of age with locally advanced gastric cancer (cT2-4aN+M0) who were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled and randomized. An as-treated population and a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population were defined for the data analysis. Interventions: Patients were randomized to undergo either laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with D2 lymphadenectomy or open distal gastrectomy (ODG) with D2 lymphadenectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was 3-year recurrence-free survival rate. Secondary end points were surgical radicality, 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, 2-week postoperative recovery indexes, and adjuvant chemotherapy completion status.
Results: In total, 95 patients were eligible for as-treated analyses (LADG: 45, of whom 13 were female [29%], with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 59 [52-65] years; ODG: 50, of whom 16 were female [32%], with a median [IQR] age of 61 [55-64] years) and mITT analyses (LADG: 47, of whom 14 were female [30%], with a median [IQR] age of 59 [52-65] years; ODG: 48, of whom 15 were female [31%], with a median [IQR] age of 61 [55-64] years). In the as-treated analyses, the LADG group had a significantly lower postoperative complication rate than the ODG group (20% vs 46%; P = .007). The postoperative visual analog scale score for pain was 1.2 units lower on postoperative day 2 only in the LADG group (95% CI, -2.1 to -0.3; P = .008). Patients in the LADG group had better adjuvant chemotherapy completion (adjusted odds ratio, 4.39; 95% CI, 1.63-11.80; P = .003) and were less likely to terminate adjuvant chemotherapy because of adverse effects (10 [22%] vs 21 [42%]; P = .04). The mITT analyses showed similar results to as-treated analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: This trial found that LADG appears to offer the benefits of better postoperative safety and adjuvant chemotherapy tolerance compared with ODG for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02404753.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31553463      PMCID: PMC6763995          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  24 in total

1.  A prospective randomized study comparing open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  J Cai; D Wei; C F Gao; C S Zhang; H Zhang; T Zhao
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  Surgical complications in gastric cancer patients preoperatively treated with chemotherapy: their risk factors and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Ji Yeong An; Kyung Min Kim; Yoo Min Kim; Jae-Ho Cheong; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  A Multi-institutional, Prospective, Phase II Feasibility Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901).

Authors:  Noriyuki Inaki; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Tetsuji Ohyama; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Natsuya Katada; Keisuke Koeda; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Akinori Takagane; Kazuyuki Kojima; Shinichi Sakuramoto; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Studies with pain rating scales.

Authors:  W W Downie; P A Leatham; V M Rhind; V Wright; J A Branco; J A Anderson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: Improved compliance with guidelines for chemotherapy and survival.

Authors:  Roger H Kim; Mindie M Kavanaugh; Gloria C Caldito
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: safety and short-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Ziyu Li; Fei Shan; Yinkui Wang; Shuangxi Li; Yongning Jia; Lianhai Zhang; Daoxin Yin; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912.

Authors:  Hitoshi Katai; Junki Mizusawa; Hiroshi Katayama; Masakazu Takagi; Takaki Yoshikawa; Takeo Fukagawa; Masanori Terashima; Kazunari Misawa; Shin Teshima; Keisuke Koeda; Souya Nunobe; Norimasa Fukushima; Takashi Yasuda; Yoshito Asao; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Mitsuru Sasako
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Laparoscopic or open distal gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: study protocol for a randomised phase II trial.

Authors:  Ziyu Li; Fei Shan; Xiangji Ying; Lianhai Zhang; Hui Ren; Shuangxi Li; Yongning Jia; Rulin Miao; Kan Xue; Zhemin Li; Yinkui Wang; Chao Yan; Yan Zhang; Fei Pang; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer in North China: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zaozao Wang; Jiadi Xing; Jun Cai; Zhongtao Zhang; Fei Li; Nengwei Zhang; Jixiang Wu; Ming Cui; Ying Liu; Lei Chen; Hong Yang; Zhi Zheng; Xiaohui Wang; Chongchong Gao; Zhe Wang; Qing Fan; Yanlei Zhu; Shulin Ren; Chenghai Zhang; Maoxing Liu; Jiafu Ji; Xiangqian Su
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  34 in total

1.  A matched cohort study of the failure pattern after laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: does the operative approach matter?

Authors:  Jun Lu; Dong Wu; Bin-Bin Xu; Zhen Xue; Hua-Long Zheng; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Ping Li; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a cohort study using the propensity score matching method.

Authors:  Yinkui Wang; Xiaokang Lei; Zining Liu; Fei Shan; Xiangji Ying; Ziyu Li; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

3.  Assessment of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: results from a multicenter analysis based on propensity matching.

Authors:  Ze-Ning Huang; Wen-Wu Qiu; Cheng-Hao Liu; Qi-Yue Chen; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ju-Li Lin; Hua-Long Zheng; Guang-Tan Lin; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 7.701

4.  Minimally invasive surgery is feasible after preoperative chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Yamamoto; Takeshi Omori; Hisashi Hara; Naoki Shinno; Keijiro Sugimura; Hiroshi Miyata; Hidenori Takahashi; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Masayuki Ohue; Masahiko Yano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-05-29

5.  Optimal Timing to Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Yinkui Wang; Zining Liu; Fei Shan; Xiangji Ying; Yan Zhang; Shuangxi Li; Yongning Jia; Ziyu Li; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Ao; Yuchen Wang; Qingzhi Song; Yingjiang Ye; Guoqing Lyu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Landscape of interventional clinical trials involving gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hussein H Khachfe; Hamza A Salhab; Mohamad Y Fares; Mohamad A Chahrour; Faek R Jamali
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  A good preoperative immune prognostic index is predictive of better long-term outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy compared with open gastrectomy for stage II gastric cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Guo-Sheng Lin; Xiao-Yan Huang; Jun Lu; Dong Wu; Hua-Long Zheng; Bin-Bin Xu; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Guang-Tan Lin; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Islam Khaled; Pablo Priego; Hany Soliman; Mohammed Faisal; Ihab Saad Ahmed
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Implementation of minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a western tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Andrianos Tsekrekos; Tania Triantafyllou; Fredrik Klevebro; Masaru Hayami; Mats Lindblad; Magnus Nilsson; Lars Lundell; Ioannis Rouvelas
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.