Literature DB >> 27287914

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: safety and short-term oncologic results.

Ziyu Li1, Fei Shan1, Yinkui Wang1, Shuangxi Li1, Yongning Jia1, Lianhai Zhang1, Daoxin Yin2, Jiafu Ji3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) versus open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in treating locally advanced distal gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
METHODS: Forty-four patients with locally advanced distal gastric cancer were enrolled. The patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before undergoing surgery. Twenty patients were allocated into LDG after NACT group and 24 patients into ODG after NACT group. Radicalness of oncological resection, surgical safety and recovery were measured and compared.
RESULTS: All operations were successfully performed without severe postoperative complications. There were no significant differences in blood loss, mean operation time, complications, distal and proximal resection margin, and number of retrieved lymph nodes between LDG and ODG groups, but LDG group had shorter length of incision and the first aerofluxus time.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy after NACT has comparable results with open distal gastrectomy in safety and efficacy in the short term.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Safety; Short-term oncologic results

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27287914     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4739-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

1.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective cohort study from China.

Authors:  Yanfeng Hu; Mingang Ying; Changming Huang; Hongbo Wei; Zhiwei Jiang; Xiang Peng; Jiankun Hu; Xiaohui Du; Baolin Wang; Feng Lin; Jian Xu; Guanglong Dong; Tingyu Mou; Guoxin Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy.

Authors:  S Kitano; Y Iso; M Moriyama; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1994-04

6.  Comparative study of clinical efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy versus open radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  L M Wu; X J Jiang; Q F Lin; C X Jian
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2015-04-15

7.  Gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan.

Authors:  Toshifusa Nakajima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Laparoscopy-assisted vs. open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: long-term outcomes and technical aspects of a case-control study.

Authors:  T Bo; Y Peiwu; Q Feng; Z Yongliang; S Yan; H Yingxue; L Huaxing
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Determinants of complications and adequacy of surgical resection in laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  B Topal; E Leys; N Ectors; R Aerts; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  18 in total

1.  Assessment of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ziyu Li; Fei Shan; Xiangji Ying; Yan Zhang; Jian-Yu E; Yinkui Wang; Hui Ren; Xiangqian Su; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Clinical value of peripheral blood microRNA detection in evaluation of SOX regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Bibo Tan; Yong Li; Yan Di; Liqiao Fan; Qun Zhao; Qingwei Liu; Dong Wang; Nan Jia
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  ypTNM staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Chinese gastric cancer population: an evaluation on the prognostic value of the AJCC eighth edition cancer staging system.

Authors:  Ziyu Li; Yinkui Wang; Fei Shan; Xiangji Ying; Zhouqiao Wu; Kan Xue; Rulin Miao; Yan Zhang; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a cohort study using the propensity score matching method.

Authors:  Yinkui Wang; Xiaokang Lei; Zining Liu; Fei Shan; Xiangji Ying; Ziyu Li; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

5.  Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Muneharu Fujisaki; Norio Mitsumori; Toshihiko Shinohara; Naoto Takahashi; Hiroaki Aoki; Yuya Nyumura; Seizo Kitazawa; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Xudong Zhao; Yanjing Song; Aizhen Cai; Hongqing Xi; Lin Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  A good preoperative immune prognostic index is predictive of better long-term outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy compared with open gastrectomy for stage II gastric cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Guo-Sheng Lin; Xiao-Yan Huang; Jun Lu; Dong Wu; Hua-Long Zheng; Bin-Bin Xu; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Guang-Tan Lin; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Islam Khaled; Pablo Priego; Hany Soliman; Mohammed Faisal; Ihab Saad Ahmed
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Patients Administered Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Could be Enrolled into an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jian Zhao; Gang Wang; Zhi-Wei Jiang; Chuan-Wei Jiang; Jiang Liu; Can-Can Xia; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Laparoscopic versus open approach in gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhipeng Zhu; Lulu Li; Jiuhua Xu; Weipeng Ye; Junjie Zeng; Borong Chen; Zhengjie Huang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.