Literature DB >> 21934308

A prospective randomized study comparing open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.

J Cai1, D Wei, C F Gao, C S Zhang, H Zhang, T Zhao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, many clinical studies have confirmed the value of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) in gastric cancer surgery, especially in early stages. But the safety and oncologic adequacy of laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer are still in debate. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.
METHODS: For this study, 123 patients who had been diagnosed endoscopically with gastric cancer were randomly assigned to either LAG (n = 61) or open gastrectomy (OG) (n = 62) which ran from March 2008 to December 2009. Clinical characteristics, operative findings, postoperative recovery, morbidity, pathological report and survival rate were compared. D2 lymph node dissection was performed in 49 patients in the LAG group and 47 patients in the OG group with advanced gastric cancer. We adopt sub-group analysis in this paper.
RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of patients in the LAG and OG groups who were in the advanced stage, included age, sex, BMI and concurrent illness, and their ECOG scores were well matched. Operative findings, postoperative recovery, morbidity, pathological findings including tumor location, depth of invasion, TNM stage, histological grade and surgical extension in the two groups were also similar. Compared to the OG group, the mean operating time was significantly longer for the LAG group (267.88 ± 54.284 min in the LAG group vs. 182.02 ± 41.016 min in the OG group, p = 6.383 × 10(-13)); the mean number of days when body temperature exceeded 37°C was significantly shorter in the LAG group (p = 6.34 × 10(-8)). There were no postoperative deaths in both the groups. The postoperative morbidity rate was 12.24% in the LAG group and 19.15% in the OG group with no significant difference (p = 0.357). However, pulmonary infection was observed more frequently in the OG group (p = 0.038). After a mean follow-up of 22.1354 months (from 4 to 36 months), 14 and 15 patients died of gastric cancer in the LAG and OG groups, respectively. Two and one patient died of nongastric cancer in the LAG and OG groups, respectively. The overall survival rates were 67.1% and 53.8% in the LAG and OG groups, respectively. The estimated mean survival time was 29.387 months in the LAG group and 28.978 months in the OG group. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall survival rate for patients in both groups - LAG and OG (log-rank test, p = 0.911, Tarone Ware test, p = 0.994, and Breslow test, p = 0. 961).
CONCLUSION: LAG with D2 lymph node dissection is a safe and feasible procedure with adequate lymphadenectomy, good curability and survival rate for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21934308     DOI: 10.1159/000330782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  75 in total

1.  Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy around the left renal vein (16a2lat) by tunneling under the pancreas for advanced Siewert type II adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shuji Takiguchi; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Kohei Murakami; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Hiroshi Miyata; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR GASTRIC CANCER: TIME TO CHANGE THE PARADIGM.

Authors:  Leandro Cardoso Barchi; Carlos Eduardos Jacob; Cláudio José Caldas Bresciani; Osmar Kenji Yagi; Donato Roberto Mucerino; Fábio Pinatel Lopasso; Marcelo Mester; Ulysses Ribeiro-Júnior; André Roncon Dias; Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos; Ivan Cecconello; Bruno Zilberstein
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations.

Authors:  Stefano Caruso; Alberto Patriti; Franco Roviello; Lorenzo De Franco; Franco Franceschini; Andrea Coratti; Graziano Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Systematic review of laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Long-yun Ye; Da-ren Liu; Chao Li; Xiao-wen Li; Ling-na Huang; Sheng Ye; Yi-xiong Zheng; Li Chen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Comparison of three different minimally invasive procedures of distal gastrectomy for Nonoverweight patients with T1N0-1 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Norihiro Haga; Toru Ishiguro; Kouki Kuwabara; Kensuke Kumamoto; Youichi Kumagai; Hiroyuki Baba; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

8.  Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective cohort study from China.

Authors:  Yanfeng Hu; Mingang Ying; Changming Huang; Hongbo Wei; Zhiwei Jiang; Xiang Peng; Jiankun Hu; Xiaohui Du; Baolin Wang; Feng Lin; Jian Xu; Guanglong Dong; Tingyu Mou; Guoxin Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Michele Orditura; Gennaro Galizia; Vincenzo Sforza; Valentina Gambardella; Alessio Fabozzi; Maria Maddalena Laterza; Francesca Andreozzi; Jole Ventriglia; Beatrice Savastano; Andrea Mabilia; Eva Lieto; Fortunato Ciardiello; Ferdinando De Vita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Comparing the short-term outcomes of totally intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy with extracorporeal gastroduodenostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single surgeon's experience and a rapid systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Deok Gie Kim; Yoon Young Choi; Ji Yeong An; In Gyu Kwon; In Cho; Yoo Min Kim; Jung Min Bae; Myung Gyu Song; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.