Literature DB >> 28027818

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: Improved compliance with guidelines for chemotherapy and survival.

Roger H Kim1, Mindie M Kavanaugh2, Gloria C Caldito3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has been demonstrated in clinical trials to have short-term benefits when compared to the open surgical approach. Guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend that patients with stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. We hypothesized that laparoscopic colectomy is associated with increased compliance to recommendations for chemotherapy, a lesser time to start of chemotherapy, and increased overall survival.
METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried to identify patients with stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer (T4, positive margins, <12 lymph nodes, or high tumor grade) diagnosed 2010-2012. Patients were divided into laparoscopic colectomy and open colectomy groups. Intent-to-treat analysis was used with converted cases included in the laparoscopic colectomy group. Rates of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, time from diagnosis and date of operation to start of chemotherapy, and overall survival were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 48,257 patients were included for analysis; 18,801 patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy and 29,456 underwent open colectomy. Laparoscopic colectomy patients received adjuvant chemotherapy at a somewhat greater rate than open colectomy (66.2% vs 59.4%, P < .01). Among patients who received chemotherapy, mean time to start of chemotherapy after definitive resection was somewhat less for laparoscopic colectomy than open colectomy (48.7 vs 52.7 days, P < .01). Two-year overall survival was greater for laparoscopic colectomy than open colectomy (81.9% vs 73.2%, P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Compared to open colectomy, laparoscopic colectomy is associated with somewhat greater rates of compliance with guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer, as well as a slightly lesser time to start of chemotherapy and improved overall survival.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28027818     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  11 in total

1.  Assessment of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ziyu Li; Fei Shan; Xiangji Ying; Yan Zhang; Jian-Yu E; Yinkui Wang; Hui Ren; Xiangqian Su; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Effect of laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: commentary on the class-01 randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Joyce Wong
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-11-26

3.  Impact of minimally invasive gastrectomy on use of and time to adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Norma E Farrow; Kyle W Freischlag; Mohamed A Adam; Dan G Blazer
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.

Authors:  David Wei; Stephen Johnston; Laura Goldstein; Deborah Nagle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Compared with the Open Approach: A Real-World Multicentric Analysis.

Authors:  Tingting Qin; Min Wang; Hang Zhang; Jingdong Li; Xiaxing Deng; Yuhua Zhang; Wenxing Zhao; Ying Fan; Dewei Li; Xuemin Chen; Yechen Feng; Siwei Zhu; Zhongqiang Xing; Guangsheng Yu; Jian Xu; Junjie Xie; Changwei Dou; Hongqin Ma; Gangshan Liu; Yue Shao; Weibo Chen; Simiao Xu; Jun Liu; Jianhua Liu; Xinmin Yin; Renyi Qin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection following stent insertion for obstructing colon cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Sung Uk Bae; Chun-Seok Yang; Sohyun Kim; Dae Ro Lim; Woon Kyung Jeong; Dae Dong Kim; Jae Hwang Kim; Eung Jin Shin; Yoo Jin Lee; Ju Yup Lee; Nam Kyu Kim; Seong Kyu Baek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Tolerability and Adverse Events of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Rectal Cancer in Patients With Diverting Ileostomy.

Authors:  Jun Takahashi; Shingo Tsujinaka; Ryo Maemoto; Yasuyuki Miyakura; Koichi Suzuki; Rintaro Fukuda; Ryotaro Sakio; Erika Machida; Toshiki Rikiyama
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic vs open surgery for pathological T4 colorectal cancer: 10 years of experience in a single center.

Authors:  Zi-Feng Yang; De-Qing Wu; Jun-Jiang Wang; Ze-Jian Lv; Yong Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Long-term and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Zhangkan Huang; Jianwei Zhang; Xu Che
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timothy P Hanna; Will D King; Stephane Thibodeau; Matthew Jalink; Gregory A Paulin; Elizabeth Harvey-Jones; Dylan E O'Sullivan; Christopher M Booth; Richard Sullivan; Ajay Aggarwal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.