| Literature DB >> 31548551 |
Shuang Zhao1,2, Shuman Zhang1, Weiwei Zhang3, Yi Gao4, Chengbo Rong1, Hexiang Wang5, Yu Liu1, Jack Ho Wong6, Tzibun Ng7.
Abstract
Fatty liver (FLD) disease is a consequence of metabolic syndrome, which is a health problem worldwide with a phenomenal rise in prevalence. In this study, two hepatoprotective polysaccharide-peptides were extracted from the mushroom Auricularia polytricha followed by chromatographic fractionation of the extract on the ion exchanger DEAE-cellulose and gel filtration on Sephadex-200 to yield two purified fractions: APPI and APPII. The monosaccharide compositions, FT-IR, N-terminal sequences, internal peptide sequences and molecular weights of the two fractions were determined. Furthermore, their hepatoprotective effect on human hepatoma HepG2 cells in vitro and in an animal model of fatty liver disease was evidenced by the findings that APPI and APPII diminished lipid deposit in cells, blood and the liver, increased cellular antioxidant activity and viability, and protected the liver against injury. The mechanistic study revealed that APPI and APPII activated the adiponectin pathway, up-regulated expression of genes controlling free fatty acid (FFA) oxidation, such as AMPK, CPTl, ACOX1 and PPARα genes, enhanced lipid metabolism, preserved hepatic function, promoted the antioxidant defense system and reduced lipid peroxidation. Hence the bioactive compounds of A. polytricha could serve as therapeutic agents in the food and pharmaceutical industries.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31548551 PMCID: PMC6757109 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49925-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1FT–IR spectrum of A. polytricha polysaccharide-peptides. (a) APPI, (b) APPII.
Figure 2Effects of APPI and APPII in vitro, (a) Cytotoxicity, (b) Hepatoprotective effect. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05 versus the model group as revealed by ANOVA.
Protective effect of APPI and APPII reflected in cellular indexes.
| Groups | TG (µmol/mg protein) | T-SOD (U/mg protein) | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 261.48 ± 25.19* | 24.22 ± 0.84* | 11.34 ± 0.48* | 9.43 ± 0.92* |
| Model | 745.51 ± 59.22 | 11.63 ± 1.24 | 23.19 ± 0.76 | 21.29 ± 0.58 |
| APPI | 604.04 ± 58.07* | 20.08 ± 1.23* | 15.24 ± 1.11* | 13.79 ± 0.43* |
| APPII | 472.84 ± 49.46* | 18.41 ± 0.98* | 18.92 ± 0.29* | 15.34 ± 0.17* |
Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 3).
*P < 0.05 versus the model group as revealed by ANOVA.
Figure 3q-PCR analysis of APPI and APPII on expression of genes in the adiponectin pathway. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 3). **P < 0.01 versus the model group as revealed by ANOVA.
Hepatoprotective effects of APPI and APPII on serum biochemical markers.
| TG (mmol/L) | TC (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) | AST (U/L) | ALT (U/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group(SLD) | 0.92 ± 0.23* | 2.36 ± 0.28* | 1.52 ± 0.19* | 0.44 ± 0.09* | 133.00 ± 16.54* | 136.60 ± 24.31* |
| Model group(HFD) | 1.96 ± 0.21 | 3.98 ± 0.44 | 1.01 ± 0.11 | 2.78 ± 0.43 | 215.40 ± 15.84 | 233.00 ± 19.72 |
| APPI + HFD group (50 mg/kg/d) | 0.44 ± 0.08* | 2.48 ± 0.08* | 1.46 ± 0.14* | 0.66 ± 0.13* | 148.50 ± 20.41* | 160.00 ± 14.83* |
| APPI + HFD group (100 mg/kg/d) | 0.39 ± 0.09* | 2.20 ± 0.3* | 1.59 ± 0.21* | 0.60 ± 0.08* | 151.00 ± 13.18* | 172.33 ± 27.26* |
| APPII + HFD group (50 mg/kg/d) | 0.33 ± 0.03* | 2.15 ± 0.24* | 1.37 ± 0.33 | 0.57 ± 0.06* | 211.33 ± 15.75 | 215.67 ± 12.93 |
| APPII + HFD group (100 mg/kg/d) | 0.24 ± 0.03* | 1.73 ± 0.33* | 1.11 ± 0.22 | 0.50 ± 0.10* | 148.33 ± 7.95* | 126.83 ± 3.99* |
Simvastatin (2 mg/kg/d) | 0.64 ± 0.08* | 2.02 ± 0.25* | 1.19 ± 0.17 | 0.73 ± 0.08* | 109.33 ± 26.63* | 101.00 ± 21.57* |
| HFD-SLD group | 0.91 ± 0.12* | 2.16 ± 0.11* | 1.34 ± 0.08* | 0.67 ± 0.03* | 115.20 ± 14.01* | 121.80 ± 30.24* |
Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05 versus the model group as revealed by ANOVA.SLD = standard laboratory diet. HFD = high fat diet.
Figure 4Hepatic TG content in rats. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05 versus the model group as revealed by ANOVA. Control rats were fed standard laboratory diet (SLD)while the rest were fed a high fat diet (HFD).
Figure 5Histopathological alterations in rat livers, stained with H&E (400×). (a) Control group, (b) Model group, (c) APPI + HFD group (50 mg/kg/d), (d) APPI + HFD group (100 mg/kg/d), (e) APPII + HFD group (50 mg/kg/d), (f) APPII + HFD group (100 mg/kg/d), (g) Simvastatin group (2 mg/kg/d). Control rats were fed standard laboratory diet (SLD) while the rest were fed a high fat diet (HFD).