| Literature DB >> 25520925 |
Wan-Chun Chiu1, Hsu-Hui Yang2, Shu-Chi Chiang1, Yu-Xuan Chou3, Hui-Ting Yang3.
Abstract
Background: Amelioration effect of Auricularia polytricha water extract (AP) on hepatic injury in an animal model of NAFLD was investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Auricularia polytricha; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Two-hit theory
Year: 2014 PMID: 25520925 PMCID: PMC4265006 DOI: 10.7603/s40681-014-0012-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicine (Taipei) ISSN: 2211-8020
Component analysis and antioxidative capacity of Auricularia Polytricha and Auricularia Auricula water extracts.
| Total protein (mg/g) | Total sugar (mg/g) | Total phenol (mg gallic acid /g) | Tannin (ìg/g) | FRAP (mM Vit C/ g ) | TEAC (mM Vit E/g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AP | 105.0± 2.3 | 593.2± 1.5 | 10.5± 0.0 | 764.2± 35.5 | 17.3 ± 0.4 | 50.4 ± 2.5 |
| AA | 81.7± 0.9 | 683.9± 1.6 | 5.4± 0.0 | 416.4± 9.9 | 7.5 ± 0.3 | 32.6 ±1.7 |
Data based on triplicate analysis from triple sampling of AA and AP extracts, values presented as mean± standard deviation. Abbreviations: AP, Auricularia Polytricha; AA, Auricularia auricular; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; TEAC, Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity.
Growth, food intake, and liver weight of animals during the experiment.
| N | HFD | RN | 1×AP | 2×AP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (gw) | |||||
| Week 8 | 191.1± 2.7 | 189.7± 2.8 | 187.2± 4.6 | 184.1± 2.6 | 193.1± 1.4 |
| Week 12 | 427.9± 12.0b | 496.7± 16.0a | 458.7± 20.0ab | 460.3± 11.0ab | 427.5± 11.2b |
| Food intake (gw/d) | 37.6± 0.3a | 35.3± 1.2a | 35.1± 1.9a | 36.9± 0.7a | 35.7± 0.8a |
| Food efficiency (%) | 14.3± 0.6b | 19.1± .2a | 17.7± 1.1ab | 16.4± 0.2ab | 14.8± 1.8b |
| Liver weight (gw) | 11.4± 0.4c | 22.0± 1.3a | 14.6± 0.6b | 17.0± 0.6b | 14.9± 0.8b |
| Hepatosomatic index (%) | 2.6± 0.1d | 4.4± 0.2a | 3.2± 0.1c | 3.7± 0.1b | 3.4± 0.1bc |
Data presented as mean ± SEM.
Superscripts represent statistically significant differences among groups. p <0.05 N: normal dietary group, HFD: high fat diet group, RN: normal diet revert group, 1×AP, and 2×AP: normal diet recovery supplemented with 0.75%(w/w) and 1.5% (w/w) AP. Hepatosomal index: liver weight/body weight
Results of AST, ALT , plasma lipids and lipid peroxidation before and after the AP supplementation
| N | HFD | RN | 1×AP | 2×AP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST (U/L) | |||||
| Week 8 | 68.0 ± 3.6b | 133.8 ± 16.6a | 126.8 ± 23.8a | 133.8 ± 8.0a | 124.5 ± 19.1a |
| Week 12 | 71.1 ± 1.2b | 113.0 ± 19.1a | 87.3 ± 8.0ab | 80.1 ± 6.2b | 79.2 ± 4.4b |
| ALT (U/L) | |||||
| Week 8 | 37.3 ± 0.9b | 57.7 ± 4.2a | 52.7 ± 2.8a | 65.5 ± 7.8a | 62.2 ± 3.8a |
| Week 12 | 31.4 ± 1.4b | 92.9 ± 26.0a | 45.8 ± 3.3ab | 47.3 ± 5.2ab | 41.6 ± 5.1b |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | |||||
| Week 8 | 37.3 ± 1.2b | 57.8 ± 5.3a | 51.5 ± 3.0a | 50.8 ± 2.9a | 54.2 ± 3.8a |
| Week 12 | 21.0 ± 2.3b | 40.9 ± 2.8a | 38.1 ± 2.8a | 27.6 ± 4.3b | 23.1 ± 1.4b |
| TC (mg/dL) | |||||
| Week 8 | 46.7 ± 2.0b | 69.1 ± 6.9a | 64.2 ± 2.8a | 69.8 ± 5.0a | 69.0 ± 2.9a |
| Week 12 | 46.3 ± 3.9c | 76.7 ± 2.9a | 58.4 ± 3.3b | 49.4 ± 2.4bc | 48.4 ± 3.9bc |
| VLDL-C (mg/dL) | |||||
| Week 8 | 26.7 ± 1.5b | 47.8± 5.6a | 43.0 ± 3.0a | 46.2 ± 6.0a | 45.7 ± 4.4b |
| Week 12 | 16.8 ± 2.5c | 29.3 ± 2.7a | 24.6 ± 1.6ab | 22.8 ± 1.7bc | 20.1 ± 1.6bc |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | |||||
| Week 8 | 5.3 ± 0.6b | 23.2 ± 4.8a | 22.3 ± 3.2a | 18.5 ± 3.3a | 24.5 ± 4.4a |
| Week 12 | 16.1 ± 0.6c | 38.0 ± 3.2a | 23.6 ± 2.5b | 18.4 ± 1.4bc | 18.4 ± 1.4bc |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | |||||
| Week 8 | 14.2 ± 0.7a | 6.0 ± 1.1b | 7.0 ± 1.0b | 7.8 ± 0.8b | 7.2 ± 1.4b |
| Week 12 | 13.0 ± 1.0a | 5.2 ± 0.8c | 8.3 ± 0.8b | 13.2 ± 1.3a | 13.2 ± 1.3a |
| FFA (nmol/μL) | |||||
| Week 8 | 0.36 ± 0.02b | 0.66 ± 0.11a | 0.58 ± 0.05a | 0.60 ± 0.23a | 0.59 ± 0.08a |
| Week 12 | 0.32 ± 0.07b | 0.56 ± 0.18a | 0.48 ± 0.12ab | 0.36 ± 0.13b | 0.32 ± 0.06b |
| MDA (μM) | |||||
| Week 8 | 14.9 ± 1.5b | 21.5 ± 0.6a | 20.6 ± 0.9a | 21.1 ± 0.9a | 20.8 ± 0.9a |
| Week 12 | 17.0 ± 0.9b | 22.6 ± 1.4a | 19.7 ± 0.5ab | 19.5 ± 1.6ab | 16.8 ± 2.7b |
Data presented as mean ± SEM.Superscripts represent statistically significant differences among groups. p <0.05 N: normal dietary group, HFD: high fat diet group, RN: normal diet revert group, 1×AP, and 2×AP: normal diet recovery supplemented with 0.75%(w/w) and 1.5% (w/w) AP.
End-point plasma glucose control, inflammatory markers, hepatic lipids, and oxidative enzyme activities.
| N | HFD | RN | 1 × AP | 2 × AP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBS (mg/dL) | 139.0 ± 7.1b | 171.3 ± 5.6a | 161.6 ± 8.2a | 141.0 ± 2.1b | 133.6 ± 7.4b |
| Insulin (μg/L) | 0.21 ± 0.04b | 1.20 ± 0.25a | 0.38 ± 0.20b | 0.29 ± 0.07b | 0.22 ± 0.04b |
| HOMA-IR | 1.7 ± 0.4b | 7.9 ± 2.4a | 4.2 ± 2.5ab | 2.5 ± 0.6b | 1.9 ± 0.4b |
| Vit E (μg/mL) | 20.8 ± 1.0a | 15.8 ± 0.7b | 17.7 ± 1.2ab | 20.0 ± 1.7a | 21.2 ± 1.9a |
| Vit C (μM) | 453.9 ±8.0bc | 388.3 ± 12.7d | 414.0 ± 17.0cd | 476.4 ± 27.4ab | 532.9 ± 37.5a |
| TNF-α (ng/mL) | 1.8 ± 0.0bc | 3.2 ± 0.4a | 2.7 ± 0.5ab | 1.2 ± 0.2c | 1.2 ± 0.2c |
| IL-6 (ng/mL) | 21.2 ± 2.2b | 48.8 ± 5.8a | 34.8 ± 7.2ab | 25.1 ± 3.2b | 23.0 ± 2.8b |
| Hepatic lipids | |||||
| cholesterol (mg/g) | 2.7 ± 0.2c | 28.7 ± 3.5a | 12.0 ± 2.6b | 4.9 ± 1.1c | 5.5 ± 1.8c |
| triglyceride (mg/g) | 4.5 ± 0.2c | 19.1 ± 1.4a | 8.8 ± 0.6b | 8.4 ± 0.9b | 6.4 ± 0.8bc |
| Hepatic oxidative status | |||||
| SOD (U/mg) | 210.0 ± 12.0a | 142.2 ± 11.9b | 187.3 ±11.0ab | 172.9 ± 32.8ab | 206.1 ± 34.2a |
| GR (nmol/min/mg) | 20.2 ± 3.3a | 10.9 ± 1.2b | 12.5 ± 2.1ab | 14.9 ± 2.4ab | 19.8 ± 3.5a |
| Catalase (nmol/min/mg) | 2032.6 ±384.1b | 3111.8 ± 250.2a | 1664.0 ± 173.2b | 1545.6 ± 166.4b | 1804.4 ±162.4b |
| GPX (nmol/min/mg) | 605.8 ± 85.5a | 351.9 ± 16.0c | 344.9 ± 23.4c | 398.7 ± 14.7bc | 511.8 ± 46.7ab |
| Vit E (μg/g) | 63.4 ± 7.8a | 14.1 ± 2.0d | 18.8 ± 2.2cd | 29.8 ± 3.4bc | 34.2 ± 3.1b |
| MDA (μmol/g) | 687.3 ± 62.2c | 1433.5 ± 59.8a | 933.7 ± 43.6b | 740.1 ± 45.9c | 699.6 ± 58.1c |
Data presented as mean ± SEM.
Superscripts represent statistically significant differences among groups. p <0.05 N, normal dietary group; HFD, high-fat diet group; RN, normal diet reversion group; 1× and 2× AP, normal diet recovery supplemented with 0.75% (w/w) and 1.5% (w/w) of Auricularia polytricha water extract, respectively.FBS, fasting blood sugar; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment- insulin resistance; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IL, interleukin; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GR, glutathione reductase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde.
Fig. 1CYP4A protein expression in each group. (n=8) Different symbols on each bar represented significantly different within groups, p <0.05. N, normal dietary group; HFD, high-fat diet group; RN, normal diet reversion group; 1× and 2× AP, normal diet recovery supplemented with 0.75% (w/w) and 1.5% (w/w) of the water extract of Auricularia polytricha , respectively.
Fig. 2H & E stain of hepatic tissue sections in the groups. Pictures were taken under 400 times magnification. Interpreting by Brunt’s method, (A) grade 0 fatty liver and inflammation (B) grade 3 fatty liver and grade 2-3 inflammation (C) grade 2 fatty liver and grade 1-2 inflammation (D) grade1-2 fatty liver and grade 0-1 inflammation (E) grade 0-1 fatty liver and grade 0-1 inflammation. The arrow-pointing area indicated neutrophil infiltration foci in the tissue section.