| Literature DB >> 31547720 |
Claudia Vollbracht1,2, Peter W Gündling1, Karin Kraft2, Iris Friesecke1,3.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Palliative medicine; ascorbic acid; cross-sectional study; folic acid; hospice and palliative care nursing; thiamine; vitamin B12; vitamin B6; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31547720 PMCID: PMC7045681 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519875370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Demographic data and clinical characteristics of the 31 study patients.
| Age, years: mean ± SD | 73.23 ± 11.54 |
| Range | 49–92 |
| Sex | Number of patients (%) |
| Female/male | 11 (35.5)/20 (64.5) |
| Vitamin supplement user | Number of patients (%) |
| Yes/no | 3 (9.7)/28 (90.3) |
| Primary disease for palliative care | Number of patients (%) |
| Oncological/non-oncological disease | 24 (77.4)/7 (22.6) |
| NRS, nutritional risk screening | Number of patients (%) |
| NRS <3 points | 21 (67.7) |
| NRS ≥3 points | 10 (32.3) |
| Performance score | Number of patients (%) |
| ECOG 2 | 18 (58.1) |
| ECOG 3 | 11 (35.5) |
| ECOG 4 | 2 (6.5) |
| Median ECOG score: 2 | |
| Karnofsky score | Number of patients (%) |
| 30 | 4 (12.9) |
| 40 | 4 (12.9) |
| 50 | 14 (45.2) |
| 60 | 6 (19.4) |
| 70 | 3 (9.7) |
| Median | 50 |
| Barthel score** | |
| Mean ± SD | 74.35 ± 24.59 |
| Median/range | 85.00/25–100 |
| Symptom intensity score (0–3) | Median, mode, minimum, maximum |
| Tension | 3, 3, 0, 3 |
| Weakness | 2, 3, 1, 3 |
| Anxiety | 2, 2, 0, 3 |
| Pain | 2, 2, 0, 3 |
| Shortness of breath | 2, 2, 0, 3 |
| Fatigue | 2, 2, 0, 3 |
| Loss of appetite | 2, 2, 0, 3 |
| Constipation | 1, 1, 0, 3 |
| Depression | 1, 0, 0, 3 |
| Confusion/Disorientation | 0, 0, 0, 3 |
| CRP* [mg/L] | |
| Mean ± SD | 65.34 ± 81.32 |
| Median/range | 23.2/0.70–296.80 |
| GFR [mL/min/1.73m2] | Number of patients (%) |
| Below normal (100–140) | 26 (83.9) |
| Within normal range | 5 (16.1) |
CRP: C-reactive protein; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; SD: standard deviation. *Normal range for CRP: 0.0–5.0 mg/L. **Measures dependence in activities of daily living: 80–100 independent, 60–79 minimally dependent; 40–59 partially dependent, 20–39 very dependent.
Analysis of vitamin and homocysteine concentrations.
| Vitamin B1 [µg/L] | Vitamin B6 [ng/mL] | Folate [ng/mL] | Vitamin B12 [pg/mL] | Vitamin C [mg/L] | Vitamin D 3 [nmol/L] | Hcy [µmol/L] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal range* | 35–99 | 4.1–43.7 | 480–1210 | 193–982 | 4.5–24.5 | 62.5–170 | <12 | |
| Optimal range* | not known | 10.0–43.7 | >750 | 600–982 | 13.9–24.9 | 75–200 | <10 | |
| Mean | 43 | 5.1 | 847 | 968 | 5.4 | 35.9 | 20 | |
| SEM | 2 | 0.8 | 59 | 276 | 0.5 | 9.7 | 1 | |
| 95% CI | lower | 39 | 3.4 | 726 | 403 | 4.4 | 16.1 | 18 |
| upper | 48 | 6.8 | 968 | 1532 | 6.5 | 55.6 | 23 | |
| Median | 42 | 4.1 | 716 | 460 | 5.3 | 23.2 | 19 | |
| SD | 12 | 4.6 | 331 | 1539 | 2.8 | 53.9 | 7 | |
| Minimum | 24 | 1.1 | 547 | 144 | 1.6 | 10.0 | 9 | |
| Maximum | 87 | 26.3 | 1968 | 7685 | 12.3 | 312.0 | 36 | |
| 25 | 35 | 2.4 | 620 | 230 | 3.1 | 14.6 | 16 | |
| Percentiles | 50 | 42 | 4.1 | 716 | 460 | 5.3 | 23.2 | 19 |
| 75 | 50 | 5.8 | 957 | 853 | 7.5 | 38.9 | 25 |
Valid patients n = 31. SEM: standard error of the mean; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation; Hcy: homocysteine. *Ranges were provided by the testing laboratory (Biovis Diagnostik MVZ GmbH).
Figure 1.Frequency [%] of patients with vitamin concentrations below normal, in the normal range and above normal
Normal ranges: B1: 35 to 99 μg/L, B6: 4.1 to 43.7 ng/mL, folate: 480 to 1210 ng/mL, B12: 193 to 982 pg/mL, C: 4.5 to 24.5 mg/L, D: 62.5 to 170 nmol/L.
Figure 2.Vitamin concentrations in relation to normal and optimal ranges. (a) B1 (b) B6 (c) folate (d) B12 (e) C (f) D3
Normal and optimal ranges were provided by the testing laboratory (Biovis Diagnostik MVZ GmbH). Normal vitamin ranges are set by reference to vitamin levels in healthy persons; the optimal range is based on concentrations associated with optimal physiological metabolic processes.
Correlation analysis.
| Variables | Correlation coefficient (r) | Sig. ( |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamins and Karnofsky score | ||
| Vitamin B12 concentrations – Karnofsky score | −0.415 | 0.02 |
| Vitamins and symptoms | ||
| Vitamin B12 concentrations – symptom ‘weakness’ | 0.401 | 0.025 |
| Vitamin D3 concentrations – symptom ‘weakness’ | 0.495 | 0.005 |
| Vitamin B12 ranges (below-normal, normal and above-normal) – symptom ‘weakness’ | 0.451 | 0.011 |
| Vitamin D3 concentrations – symptom ‘anxiety’ | 0.434 | 0.015 |
| Vitamin D3 ranges (below-normal, normal and above-normal) – symptom ‘pain’ | −0.373 | 0.039 |
| Vitamin D3 ranges (below-normal, normal and above-normal) – symptom ‘depression’ | −0.377 | 0.037 |
| Vitamin B1 ranges (below-normal and normal) – symptom ‘pain’ | −0.384 | 0.033 |
| Vitamin B1 ranges (below-normal and normal) – symptom ‘depression’ | −0.439 | 0.014 |
| Vitamins among themselves | ||
| Vitamin C ranges (below-normal and normal) – Vitamin B1 ranges (below-normal and normal) | 0.502 | 0.004 |
| Vitamin C ranges (below-normal and normal) – Vitamin B6 ranges (below-normal and normal) | 0.418 | 0.019 |
| Vitamin D3 ranges (below-normal, normal and above-normal) – Vitamin B1 ranges (below-normal and normal) | −0.445 | 0.012 |
Valid patients n = 31. The table displays only significant correlations between Karnofsky score and vitamins, symptoms and vitamins, and vitamins among themselves. Correlation analyses were conducted for vitamin concentrations (continuous data) and ranges (categories). For the parametric measurements of vitamin C and Hcy, Pearson correlation coefficient was used; for all other measurements, Spearman’s rho values were calculated.