Literature DB >> 19477052

ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: non-surgical oncology.

F Bozzetti1, J Arends, K Lundholm, A Micklewright, G Zurcher, M Muscaritoli.   

Abstract

Parenteral nutrition offers the possibility of increasing or ensuring nutrient intake in patients in whom normal food intake is inadequate and enteral nutrition is not feasible, is contraindicated or is not accepted by the patient. These guidelines are intended to provide evidence-based recommendations for the use of parenteral nutrition in cancer patients. They were developed by an interdisciplinary expert group in accordance with accepted standards, are based on the most relevant publications of the last 30 years and share many of the conclusions of the ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition in oncology. Under-nutrition and cachexia occur frequently in cancer patients and are indicators of poor prognosis and, per se, responsible for excess morbidity and mortality. Many indications for parenteral nutrition parallel those for enteral nutrition (weight loss or reduction in food intake for more than 7-10 days), but only those who, for whatever reason cannot be fed orally or enterally, are candidates to receive parenteral nutrition. A standard nutritional regimen may be recommended for short-term parenteral nutrition, while in cachectic patients receiving intravenous feeding for several weeks a high fat-to-glucose ratio may be advised because these patients maintain a high capacity to metabolize fats. The limited nutritional response to the parenteral nutrition reflects more the presence of metabolic derangements which are characteristic of the cachexia syndrome (or merely the short duration of the nutritional support) rather than the inadequacy of the nutritional regimen. Perioperative parenteral nutrition is only recommended in malnourished patients if enteral nutrition is not feasible. In non-surgical well-nourished oncologic patients routine parenteral nutrition is not recommended because it has proved to offer no advantage and is associated with increased morbidity. A benefit, however, is reported in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Short-term parenteral nutrition is however commonly accepted in patients with acute gastrointestinal complications from chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and long-term (home) parenteral nutrition will sometimes be a life-saving maneuver in patients with sub acute/chronic radiation enteropathy. In incurable cancer patients home parenteral nutrition may be recommended in hypophagic/(sub)obstructed patients (if there is an acceptable performance status) if they are expected to die from starvation/under nutrition prior to tumor spread.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477052     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  102 in total

Review 1.  [Nutrition and fluid management in palliative medicine: do food and drink keep body and soul together?].

Authors:  E Gaser; W Meissner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Nutrition and exercise interventions for patients with lung cancer appear beneficial, but more studies are required.

Authors:  N Kiss; E Isenring
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  [Inappropriate and insufficient nutrition in ENT tumors].

Authors:  J Büntzel; H Büntzel; O Micke; R Mücke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  An overview of the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Symposium on Cancer and Nutrition 2009: from cancer prevention to nutrition support to alleviating suffering in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Florian Strasser; An Van den Broek; Aminah Jatoi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  The Chicago Consensus on Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: Palliative Care Considerations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  [A case report of the difficulty treating an endstage oncologic ENT patient with parenteral nutrition].

Authors:  Ulrike Uxa-Benold; Ralph Simanek; Annette Henry; Dietmar Weixler; Klaus Geissler
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2014-04-29

7.  Home parenteral nutrition improves quality of life and nutritional status in patients with cancer: a French observational multicentre study.

Authors:  S Culine; C Chambrier; A Tadmouri; P Senesse; P Seys; A Radji; M Rotarski; A Balian; P Dufour
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Quality of care for cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition: development of key interventions and outcome indicators using a two-round Delphi approach.

Authors:  Mira Dreesen; Veerle Foulon; Martin Hiele; Kris Vanhaecht; Lutgart De Pourcq; Loris Pironi; André Van Gossum; Jann Arends; Cristina Cuerda; Paul Thul; Frederico Bozzetti; Ludo Willems
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) of the tongue and of the oral cavity: a large retrospective study.

Authors:  Andrea Piccin; Mario Tagnin; Cinzia Vecchiato; Ahmad Al-Khaffaf; Lisa Beqiri; Caroline Kaiser; Iris Agreiter; Giovanni Negri; Michael Kob; Angela Di Pierro; Fabio Vittadello; Guido Mazzoleni; Klaus Eisendle; Fabrizio Fontanella
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 10.  Cachexia in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Poorna Anandavadivelan; Pernilla Lagergren
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.