| Literature DB >> 31537780 |
Philip J M Brouwer1, Aleksandar Antanasijevic2, Zachary Berndsen2, Anila Yasmeen3, Brooke Fiala4,5, Tom P L Bijl1, Ilja Bontjer1, Jacob B Bale4,5,6, William Sheffler4,5, Joel D Allen7, Anna Schorcht1, Judith A Burger1, Miguel Camacho1, Daniel Ellis4,5, Christopher A Cottrell2, Anna-Janina Behrens8,9, Marco Catalano1, Iván Del Moral-Sánchez1, Thomas J Ketas3, Celia LaBranche10, Marit J van Gils1, Kwinten Sliepen1, Lance J Stewart4,5, Max Crispin7,8, David C Montefiori10, David Baker4,5,11, John P Moore3, Per Johan Klasse3, Andrew B Ward2, Neil P King12,13, Rogier W Sanders14.
Abstract
The development of native-like HIV-1 envelope (Env) trimer antigens has enabled the induction of neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses against neutralization-resistant HIV-1 strains in animal models. However, NAb responses are relatively weak and narrow in specificity. Displaying antigens in a multivalent fashion on nanoparticles (NPs) is an established strategy to increase their immunogenicity. Here we present the design and characterization of two-component protein NPs displaying 20 stabilized SOSIP trimers from various HIV-1 strains. The two-component nature permits the incorporation of exclusively well-folded, native-like Env trimers into NPs that self-assemble in vitro with high efficiency. Immunization studies show that the NPs are particularly efficacious as priming immunogens, improve the quality of the Ab response over a conventional one-component nanoparticle system, and are most effective when SOSIP trimers with an apex-proximate neutralizing epitope are displayed. Their ability to enhance and shape the immunogenicity of SOSIP trimers make these NPs a promising immunogen platform.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31537780 PMCID: PMC6753213 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12080-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Design and biophysical properties of BG505 SOSIP-I53-50A.1NT1. a Schematic representation of the computational docking protocol used to identify trimeric NP components suitable for fusion to BG505 SOSIP. r and ω were sampled during docking to minimize d while avoiding clashes. The C termini of BG505 SOSIP and N termini of the I53-50A trimer are shown as red and blue spheres, and the dashed line indicates the linker that connects BG505 SOSIP and I53-50A. b Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of BG505 SOSIP and BG505 SOSIP-I53-50A.1NT1 under reducing (left) and non-reducing (right) conditions. c SEC chromatogram of BG505 SOSIP-I53-50A.1NT1 with peaks corresponding to aggregates and trimers annotated (left) and blue native (BN)-PAGE of trimer fractions (right). d NS-EM analysis of PGT145/SEC-purified BG505 SOSIP-I53-50A.1NT1 with BG505 SOSIP (light blue) and I53-50A.1NT1 (dark blue) annotated. Shown are 2D-class averages. e Glycan profile of BG505 SOSIP-I53-50A.1NT1 as determined by HILIC-UPLC with complex glycans in pink and oligomannose glycans in green. The pie chart represents the percentage of total complex glycans vs. oligomannose glycans per trimer. The percentages of Man5-9GlcNAc2 glycans (M5–M9) are listed in the table for BG505 SOSIP and BG505 SOSIP-I53-50A.1NT1. Source data are provided as a Source Data file
Fig. 2Characterization of BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP assembly and cryo-EM structure. a Representative SEC chromatogram (left) of assembled BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP (red) overlaid with BG505 SOSIP-I53-50A.1NT1 (gray) and reducing SDS-PAGE (right) of pooled BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP fractions. b Raw NS-EM micrograph of pooled fractions corresponding to BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NPs. The white bar corresponds to 200 nm. c Segmentation of the sharpened cryo-EM map at high contour level showing details of NP core (left) and Gaussian filtered map at low contour levels showing poorly resolved SOSIP trimers (right). d Details of I53-50A.1NT1 (left) and I53-50B.4PT1 (right) showing the predicted model (top) and cryo-EM map (bottom). Root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) are shown below each component. e Low-pass-filtered cyro-EM map and pseudo-atomic model of BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP with detail of the linker separating I53-50A.1NT1 and BG505 SOSIP. Source data are provided as a Source Data file
Morphology and thermostability of SOSIP-I53-50NPs
| Morphology (DLS) | Thermostability (nanoDSF) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pd (%)b | ||||
| BG505 SOSIP | 6.7d | 4.4d | 72.4 (±1.3) | – |
| BG505 SOSIP-I53-50A.1NT1 | n.d. | n.d. | 72.6 (±0.6) | – |
| BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 22.6 | 5.2 | 72.5 (±0.2) | 82.0 (±0.2) |
| ConM SOSIP | 6.4e | 12.5e | 65.7 (±0.1) | – |
| ConM SOSIP-I53-50A | n.d. | n.d. | 67.8 (±0.1) | – |
| ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 22.6 | 7.1 | 69.1 (±0.1) | 84.4 (±0.2)f |
| ZM197M SOSIP-I53-50NP | 24.6 | 13.8 | 72.1 (±0.1) | 83.9 (±0.6)f |
| AMC011 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 23.8 | 11.0 | 74.0 (±0.4) | 89.0 (±1.3)f |
All samples have been subjected to a freeze–thaw cycle at −80 °C prior to experiments. All SOSIP-I53-50NPs have the expected Rh of an intact NP and are monodisperse after a freeze–thaw cycle at −80 °C. For BG505 and ConM, corresponding SOSIP trimers and SOSIP fusion proteins are included for comparison. The AMC011 SOSIP-I53-50NP solution was mixed 3:1 with Protein Stabilizing Cocktail (ThermoScientific) prior to freezing. NanoDSF experiments were performed three times. Shown are the means of three measurements with SDs between brackets. See also Supplementary Fig. 3. n.d. not determined
aRh = hydrodynamic radius
bPd = polydispersity, a sample with a Pd < 14% is considered monodisperse
cTm = melting temperature
dValues adopted from ref. [36]
eValues adopted from ref. [22]
fAs the NanoDSF software did not give a clean valley in the first derivative, it was unable to determine the Tm. Therefore, the Tm was determined manually by taking the lowest point in the first derivative
Cryo-EM data collection, refinement, and validation statistics
| BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Magnification | 38,168 |
| Voltage (kV) | 300 |
| Electron exposure (e−/Å2) | 46.6 |
| Defocus range (μm) | 1.2–5.1 |
| Pixel size (Å) | 1.31 |
| Symmetry imposed | I1 |
| Initial particle images (no.) | 3996 |
| Final particle images (no.) | 3590 |
| Map resolution (Å) | 4.5 (0.143) |
| FSC threshold | |
| Map resolution range (Å) | 4.4–6 |
|
| |
| Initial model used (PDB code) | NA |
| Model resolution (Å) | NA |
| FSC threshold | |
| Model resolution range (Å) | NA |
| Map sharpening | −149 |
| Model composition | |
| Non-hydrogen atoms | 0 |
| Protein residues | 351 |
| Ligands | 0 |
|
| NA |
| Protein | |
| Ligand | |
| R.m.s. deviations | |
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.017 |
| Bond angles (°) | 1.586 |
| Validation | |
| MolProbity score | 0.5 |
| Clashscore | 0 |
| Poor rotamers (%) | 0 |
| EMRinger score | 1.55 |
| Ramachandran plot | |
| Favored (%) | 99.7 |
| Allowed (%) | 0 |
| Disallowed (%) | 0 |
Fig. 3Characterization of ConM, ZM197M, and AMC011 SOSIP-I53-50NP assembly. a SEC chromatograms of assembled ConM, ZM197, and AMC011 SOSIP-I53-50NPs (from top to bottom). b Raw NS-EM micrographs and 2D-class averages of the pooled SOSIP-I53-50NP fractions corresponding to the SEC chromatogram to the direct left. Particles were subjected to a freeze–thaw cycle prior to NS-EM analysis. The AMC011 SOSIP-I53-50NP solution was mixed 3:1 with Protein Stabilizing Cocktail (ThermoScientific) prior to freezing. The white bar corresponds to 200 nm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file
Kinetics and stoichiometry of Fab binding to SOSIP trimers and SOSIP-I53-50NPs
| Langmuir modeling of Fabs binding | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fab | Envelope protein |
| |||||
| PGT145 | BG505 SOSIP | 3 | 2.4 × 105 ± 5.9 × 104 | 3.5 × 10−4 ± 3.3 × 10−6 | 1.8 ± 0.62 | – | 0.94 ± 1.9 × 10−2 |
| BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 2.1 × 105 ± 1.6 × 105 | 3.1 × 10−4 ± 1.2 × 10−4 | 4.8 ± 4.2 | 18 ± 0.64 | 0.88 ± 3.2 × 10−2 | |
| ConM SOSIP | 4 | 1.6 × 105 ± 1.1 × 104 | 3.8 × 10−4 ± 9.5 × 10−6 | 2.5 ± 0.15 | – | 0.79 ± 5.2 × 10−2 | |
| ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 3 | 1.5 × 105 ± 9.5 × 103 | 4.2 × 10−4 ± 3.8 × 10−5 | 2.8 ± 0.26 | 20 ± 2.5 | 0.94 ± 9.9 × 10−2 | |
| 3BNC117 | BG505 SOSIP | 3 | 3.5 × 104 ± 1.2 × 103 | 9.0 × 10−5 ± 1.3 × 10−5 | 2.6 ± 0.33 | – | 2.9 ± 0.18 |
| BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 2.0 × 104 ± 5.0 × 102 | 4.0 × 10−5 ± 3.5 × 10−6 | 2.1 ± 0.15 | 55 ± 0.89 | 2.8 ± 4.5 × 10−2 | |
| ConM SOSIP | 2 | 2.7 × 104 ± 5.0 × 102 | 2.6 × 10−4 ± 5.0 × 10−6 | 9.6 ± 0 | – | 2.8 ± 0 | |
| ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 1.4 × 104 ± 5.0 × 102 | 7.6 × 10−5 ± 2.4 × 10−5 | 5.8 ± 1.8 | 50 ± 0.39 | 2.5 ± 1.9 × 10−2 | |
| PGT122 | BG505 SOSIP | 3 | 1.3 × 104 ± 6.7 × 102 | 1.6 × 10−4 ± 3.1 × 10−5 | 13 ± 2.7 | – | 1.3 ± 1.1 × 10−2 |
| BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 3 | 6.6 × 103 ± 2.0 × 102 | 2.4 × 10−4 ± 8.4 × 10−5 | 36 ± 13 | 25 ± 1.2 | 1.3 ± 6.2 × 10−2 | |
| ConM SOSIP | 5 | 4.2 × 104 ± 1.4 × 103 | 4.2 × 10−5 ± 6.3 × 10−6 | 0.99 ± 0.14 | – | 2.8 ± 4.7 × 10−2 | |
| ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 6 | 3.5 × 104 ± 8.8 × 102 | 1.0 × 10−4 ± 1.7 × 10−5 | 2.9 ± 0.49 | 51 ± 0.82 | 2.5 ± 4.1 × 10−2 | |
| 35O22 | BG505 SOSIP | 3 | 1.2 × 104 ± 3.3 × 102 | 2.6 × 10−4 ± 2.7 × 10−5 | 22 ± 2.3 | – | 1.5 ± 5.5 × 10−2 |
| BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 4.6 × 103 ± 5.0 × 102 | 2.4 × 10−4 ± 1.5 × 10−5 | 51 ± 9.0 | 25 ± 1.9 | 1.2 ± 0.10 | |
| ConM SOSIP | 2 | 2.3 × 104 ± 5.0 × 102 | 8.0 × 10−5 ± 1.9 × 10−5 | 3.5 ± 0.90 | – | 1.1 ± 4.8 × 10−2 | |
| ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 5.5 × 104 ± 5.0 × 102 | 1.0 × 10−4 ± 1.1 × 10−5 | 1.9 ± 0.25 | 28 ± 1.3 | 1.4 ± 6.5 × 10−2 | |
| 3BNC315 | BG505 SOSIP | 3 | 5.5 × 103 ± 2.7 × 102 | 4.1 × 10−5 ± 2.3 × 10−5 | 8.8 ± 4.9 | – | 1.7 ± 4.5 × 10−2 |
| BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 4.1 × 103 ± 0 | <10−5 | <3 | 22 ± 0.52 | 1.1 ± 2.6 × 10−2 | |
| ConM SOSIP | 2 | 3.6 × 104 ± 4.5 × 103 | 1.8 × 10−4 ± 2.0 × 10−5 | 5.1 ± 0.15 | – | 2.2 ± 0.19 | |
| ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 1.5 × 104 ± 1.0 × 103 | 6.0 × 10−5 ± 2.4 × 10−5 | 4.2 ± 2.0 | 33 ± 1.7 | 1.6 ± 8.3 × 10−2 | |
Shown are average kinetics (kon = the on-rate constant, kon = the off-rate constant, KD = disassociation constant) and stoichiometry values (Sm = stoichiometry) of replicate (n) SPR experiments with standard error of the mean. Since a Langmuir model did not fit well for PGT151 Fab binding to ConM SOSIP a conformational-change model was used for this particular Fab. Average kinetics and stoichiometry values are shown in addition to conversion constants kf and kb and the forward-conversion-equilibrium constant KF. See also Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Methods for further analysis and explanation
Fig. 4SPR and B-cell activation analysis of BG505 and ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP. a Each pair of sensorgrams shows the binding of SOSIP trimer (left) and SOSIP-I53-50NPs (right) to immobilized IgG of the bNAbs indicated above the sensorgrams. Trimers and NPs were titrated at a constant ratio of concentrations corresponding to equal amounts of SOSIP per volume as indicated in the color code to the right. Langmuir model fits in black are overlaid on the colored binding curves for each concentration. Please note that although Langmuir curves were fitted, no kinetic modeling was performed due to severe mass-transport limitations (for further explanation, see SOSIP trimer and SOSIP-I53-50NP binding to immobilized mAbs by SPR in Supplementary Methods). b The difference in macromolecules of SOSIP trimer or SOSIP-I53-50NP bound to several immobilized bNAbs plotted as a ratio (left) and a model of SOSIP (gray) presented on the I53-50NP (I53-50A in beige, I53-50B.4PT1 in light blue) with the corresponding bNAb footprints shown. c Activation of PGT145, VRC01, and PGT121-expressing B cells, measured by Ca2+ flux over 210 seconds for BG505 and ConM SOSIP-I53-50NPs (purple), ConM SOSIP-ferritin (orange), and the corresponding trimer (green). Unmodified I53-50NPs (red) were included to determine nonspecific activation by the I53-50NP core. Blanc, for which PBS was used, functioned as an additional negative control (blue). Source data are provided as a Source Data file
Fig. 5Immunogenicity of ConM and BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NPs. a, f Schematic representation of the immunization schedule and color coding for the immunogens tested. b–e, g, h Statistical differences between two groups (n = 5 individual rabbits for (b–e); n = 8 individual rabbits for (g, h)) were determined using unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-tests (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01). b. ConM SOSIP endpoint binding titers over time as measured by Ni-NTA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Blue stars indicate significant differences for ConM SOSIP-ferritin vs. ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP. Brown stars indicate significant differences for ConM SOSIP vs. ConM SOSIP-ferritin. Shown are medians with interquartile range. c ConM midpoint neutralization titers over time. Blue and black stars indicate significant differences for ConM SOSIP-ferritin vs. ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP and ConM SOSIP vs. ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP, respectively. Shown are medians with interquartile range. d ConM and ConS midpoint neutralization titers at week 4 (left), week 6 (middle), and week 22 (right). Horizontal bars indicate the median. For replicate neutralization data from Duke UMC, see also Supplementary Table 2. e SF162, MW965, and MN.3 midpoint neutralization titers at week 22. Horizontal bars indicate the median. See also Supplementary Table 2. g BG505 SOSIP endpoint binding titers over time as measured by Ni-NTA ELISA. Shown are medians with interquartile range. h BG505 midpoint neutralization titers over time. Shown are medians with interquartile range. See also Supplementary Table 3. Source data are provided as a Source Data file
Fig. 6Epitope mapping of BG505 and ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP-induced (N)Ab responses. a Color coding for b–e. b–e Statistical differences between two groups were determined using unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-tests (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). b Ratio of midpoint neutralization titers of several BG505 virus mutants relative to the parental BG505 virus is plotted (RID50). Mutants shown are BG505 with glycans knocked in at position 241 and 289 (BG505 241KI+289KI), position 241 (BG505 241KI), position 289 (BG505 289KI), or a glycan knocked out at position 611 (BG505 611KO). Epitope mapping was only performed for sera from rabbits that had an ID50 > 100 (n = 7 individual rabbits, for BG505 SOSIP recipients; n = 4 individual rabbits for BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP recipients). See also Supplementary Table 3. Horizontal bars indicate the median. c Residual binding of bNAbs CH01, PGT128, VRC01, 8ANC195, ACS202, 35O22, and non-NAb RM19R after incubation of sera (n = 8 individual rabbits) with immobilized BG505 SOSIP in ELISA (left) and surface model of BG505 SOSIP (gray) with the corresponding Ab footprints highlighted. Bars indicate the median. d Midpoint autologous ConM neutralization in the absence of a blocking agent (no blocking), with ConM SOSIP added (+ConM SOSIP) or with ConM SOSIP that has the V1V2-loop of BG505 (+ConM SOSIP (V1V2 BG505)). Statistical differences between the three groups (n = 5 individual rabbits) was determined using a Friedman test followed by a Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001). e Residual binding of bNAbs VRC01, PGT128, CH01, PG16, and gl-PG9 after incubation of sera with immobilized ConM SOSIP in ELISA. Bars indicate the median (n = 5 individual rabbits). Source data are provided as a Source Data file