| Literature DB >> 31537137 |
Giuseppe Lanza1,2, Jacopo Antonino Casabona3, Maria Bellomo3, Mariagiovanna Cantone4, Francesco Fisicaro5, Rita Bella5, Giovanni Pennisi1, Placido Bramanti6, Manuela Pennisi7, Alessia Bramanti6.
Abstract
Some evidence suggests that high-intensity motor training slows down the severity of spinocerebellar ataxia. However, whether all patients might benefit from these activities, and by which activity, and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We provide an update on the effect and limitations of different training programmes in patients with spinocerebellar ataxias. Overall, data converge of the finding that intensive training is still based either on conventional rehabilitation protocols or whole-body controlled videogames ("exergames"). Notwithstanding the limitations, short-term improvement is observed, which tends to be lost once the training is stopped. Exergames and virtual reality can ameliorate balance, coordination, and walking abilities, whereas the efficacy of adapted physical activity, gym, and postural exercises depends on the disease duration and severity. In conclusion, although a disease-modifying effect has not been demonstrated, constant, individually tailored, high-intensity motor training might be effective in patients with degenerative ataxia, even in those with severe disease. These approaches may enhance the remaining cerebellar circuitries or plastically induce compensatory networks. Further research is required to identify predictors of training success, such as the type and severity of ataxia and the level of residual functioning.Entities:
Keywords: Spinocerebellar ataxia; exercise movement techniques; exergames; neural plasticity; neurological rehabilitation; neuropsychiatric diseases
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31537137 PMCID: PMC7579332 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519854626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Main studies on intensive motor training in degenerative ataxia.
| Authors, yearref | No. of patients | Type of ataxia (no. of subjects affected) | Age, years/range (sex) | Type of intervention(s) | Duration | Post-training | Outcome measures | Main findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gill-body et al., 1997[ | 2 | Cerebellar atrophy (1)Post-surgical ataxia (1) | 48 (M)36 (F) | Balance exercises | 6 weeks | No | Balance testsPosturography | ↑ Balance↑ Stability during gait |
| Pèrez-Avila et al., 2004[ | 87 | Mild SCA2 | Mean (SD): 38.1 ± 10.9; range: 17–69(sex not specified) | Physical exercises based on coordination, balance, and muscular strength | 6 months | No | Balance quantitative testsNeurological indices | ↑ Static balance↑ Neurological indices |
| Vaz et al., 2008[ | 2 | Chronic ataxia | 25 (F)53 (M) | Treadmill training sessions, with progression in velocity and step length | 20-minute session, three times a week for 10 weeks | No | Rivermead Visual GaitTimed up and go testTime to complete a balance taskWalking speed, cadence, and stride length | ↑ Parameters at baseline and subsequent phases. Significantly superior effects of treadmill training over baseline conditions on cadence. |
| Cernak et al., 2008[ | 1 | Severe ataxia | 13 (F) | Locomotor training with a treadmill | 5 days a week for 4 weeks in a clinic | 5 days a week for 4 months at home | FIM | ↑ Ambulatory function, although the intensity and duration of training may be prolonged |
| Ilg et al., 2009[ | 16 | Cerebellar degeneration (10)Degeneration of afferent pathways (6) | 40–79(8 M, 8 F) | Intensive coordinative physiotherapy | 1 hour, 3 days a week for 4 weeks | No | Ataxia rating scalesIndividual goal attainment scoresQuantitative movement analysis | ↓ Ataxia↑ Balance↑ Limb coordination↑ Gait speed and lateral sway |
| Freund and Stetts, 2010[ | 1 | Severe ataxia | 23 (M) | Trunk stabilization trainingLocomotor training using a treadmill Overground walking for balance, gait, and trunk muscle performance | 28 sessions, two times a week for 10 weeks | 10 60-minute sessions for the next 4 weeks | BBSTimed unsupported stanceFAC10-m walk testOPTIMALAbdominis thicknessIsometric trunk endurance tests | ↑ Balance↑ Gait↑ Trunk muscle performance |
| Ilg et al., 2010[ | 14 | Degenerative cerebellar disease | 40–79(8 M, 6 F) | Intensive exercises (static and dynamic balance; trunk-limb coordination; fall-preventing strategies; treating or preventing contractures) | Three sessions,1 hour per week for 4 weeks | 1 year of exercises at home | SARA BBSGASADL | ↑ Balance↑ Motor performance↑ Coordination↑ ADL |
| Miyai, 2012[ | 42 | SCA6 (20)SCA31 (6)ICA (16) | Mean (SD): 62.5 ± 8.0 (sex not specified) | Physical therapy for balance and gaitOccupational therapy for coordination and ADL | 1 hour + 1 hour a week for 4 weeks | No | SARAFIM | ↓ Ataxia↑ Gait speed↑ ADLImprovement in ataxia and gait speed lasted for 12 and 24 weeks |
| Miyai et al., 2012[ | 42 | SCA6 (20)SCA31 (6)ICA (16) | Mean (SD): 62.5 ± 8.0 (22 M, 20 F) | Physical and occupational therapy focussing on coordination, balance, and ADL | 2 hours on weekdays, 1 hour on weekends for 4 weeks | No | SARAFIMGait speed and cadenceFACNumber of fallsADL | ↑ Ataxia (trunk more than limbs)↑ Gait speed↑ ADLImprovement was sustained at 12 and 24 weeks |
| Ilg et al., 2012[ | 10 | Moderate degenerative ataxia | 11–20(5 M, 5 F) | Three videogames to exercise whole-body coordination and dynamic balance | Lab-based 2-week training | 6 weeks of training at home | SARADynamic Gait IndexActivity-specific Balance Confidence Scale | ↑ Balance↑ Coordination↑ Posture↑ Gait |
| Burciu et al., 2013[ | 19 | SCA6 (6)Sporadic adult-onset ataxia (9)Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type III (3)SCA14 (1) | 54–71(3 M, 3 F)26–73(8 M, 1 F)42–51(2 M, 1 F)F | Sensory-motor trainingBalance exercises | 2 weeks | No | SARAInternational Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale Voxel-based morphometry | ↑ Balance ↑ Grey matter volume in the dorsal premotor cortex, and to a lesser extent, in the cerebellum |
| Santos de Oliveira et al., 2015[ | 11 | SCA2 (2)SCA3 (8)SCA7 (1) | 28–59 (5 M, 6 F) | Exercises to improve static and dynamic balance, and whole body movementsFall-preventing strategies | Twice per week, for 4 weeks | No | BBS | ↑ Balance↓ Risk of falls |
| Schatton et al., 2017[ | 10 | Advanced degenerative ataxia | Mean (SD): 16.0 ± 7.4(7 M, 3 F) | Home-based training with body-controlled videogames | 12 weeks | No | SARAGASQuantitative movement analysis | ↑ Balance↑ Coordination↑ Posture↑ GaitBenefits correlating to the amount of training |
Abbreviations and symbols: No.: number; ↑ = increase; ↓ = decrease; M = male; F = female; ADL = Activity of Daily Living; BBS = Berg Balance Score; FAC = Functional Ambulation Category; FIM = Functional Independence Measure; GAS = Goal Attainment Score; ICA = idiopathic cerebellar ataxia; OPTIMAL = Outpatient Physical Therapy Improvement in Movement Assessment Log Transverse; SARA = Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia; SCA = spinocerebellar ataxia; SD = standard deviation