| Literature DB >> 36225892 |
Giuseppe Lanza1,2, Francesco Fisicaro3, Raffaele Dubbioso4, Federico Ranieri5, Andrei V Chistyakov6, Mariagiovanna Cantone7,8, Manuela Pennisi3, Alfio Antonio Grasso1, Rita Bella9, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro10,11.
Abstract
Although primary degenerative diseases are the main cause of dementia, a non-negligible proportion of patients is affected by a secondary and potentially treatable cognitive disorder. Therefore, diagnostic tools able to early identify and monitor them and to predict the response to treatment are needed. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neurophysiological technique capable of evaluating in vivo and in "real time" the motor areas, the cortico-spinal tract, and the neurotransmission pathways in several neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders, including cognitive impairment and dementia. While consistent evidence has been accumulated for Alzheimer's disease, other degenerative cognitive disorders, and vascular dementia, to date a comprehensive review of TMS studies available in other secondary dementias is lacking. These conditions include, among others, normal-pressure hydrocephalus, multiple sclerosis, celiac disease and other immunologically mediated diseases, as well as a number of inflammatory, infective, metabolic, toxic, nutritional, endocrine, sleep-related, and rare genetic disorders. Overall, we observed that, while in degenerative dementia neurophysiological alterations might mirror specific, and possibly primary, neuropathological changes (and hence be used as early biomarkers), this pathogenic link appears to be weaker for most secondary forms of dementia, in which neurotransmitter dysfunction is more likely related to a systemic or diffuse neural damage. In these cases, therefore, an effort toward the understanding of pathological mechanisms of cognitive impairment should be made, also by investigating the relationship between functional alterations of brain circuits and the specific mechanisms of neuronal damage triggered by the causative disease. Neurophysiologically, although no distinctive TMS pattern can be identified that might be used to predict the occurrence or progression of cognitive decline in a specific condition, some TMS-associated measures of cortical function and plasticity (such as the short-latency afferent inhibition, the short-interval intracortical inhibition, and the cortical silent period) might add useful information in most of secondary dementia, especially in combination with suggestive clinical features and other diagnostic tests. The possibility to detect dysfunctional cortical circuits, to monitor the disease course, to probe the response to treatment, and to design novel neuromodulatory interventions in secondary dementia still represents a gap in the literature that needs to be explored.Entities:
Keywords: cognitive impairment; cortical excitability; dementia; electrophysiology; neuromodulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36225892 PMCID: PMC9549917 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.995000
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.702
Relevant transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) findings reported in most common secondary cognitive disorders.
| References | N. | Age, years (range) | Disease | rMT | CMCT | SAI | SICI | ICF | cSP | iSP | LTP |
|
| 24 patients | 72.0 (49.0–82.0) | NPH | ↑ in non- responders | |||||||
|
| 23 patients | 75.0 ± 7.8 (60.0–92.0) | NPH | ↓ | = | ↓ | = | ||||
|
| 20 patients | 73.6 | NPH | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | |||||
|
| 11 patients | 69.0 ± 6.7 | NPH | ↓ after drainage | ↑ | ↓ | = | = | ↑ | ||
|
| 20 patients | 43.9 ± 10.7 | MS | = | ↓ | ||||||
|
| 42 patients | 23.0–54.0 | MS | = | =, also LICI | = | ↓ | ||||
|
| 80 patients | 17.0–39.0 | MS | = | =, also LICI | = | ↓pre | ||||
|
| 28 patients | 51.9 (34.9–70.0) | MS | ↑ | |||||||
|
| 17 patients | 39.72 ± 10.33 | MS | ||||||||
|
| 30 preserved functions | 42.9 ± 11.0 | MS | = | = | ↑ | |||||
|
| 50 patients | 51.82 ± 12.72 | MS | ↓ | |||||||
|
| 21 fatigued | 53.0 (34–62) fatigued | MS | = | ↓at 2 ms | = | = | = | |||
|
| 82 patients | 47.51 ± 10.2 | MS | = | |||||||
|
| 110 patients | 48.4 ± 10.5 | MS | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ||||
|
| 110 patients | 47.59 ± 10.64 (males = 30) | MS | ↑ (active) in females from the weaker side | ↑ (latency) in males from the weaker side | ↑ in females from the weaker side | ↑ in males from the weaker side | ||||
|
| 20 patients | 33.0 (24.0–45.0) | CD | = | = | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | |||
|
| 13 patients | 39.0 (24.0–46.0) | CD | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ||||
|
| 20 gluten-free | 35.1 ± 6.0 | CD | = | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ in | ||||
|
| 1 patient | 72.0 | GFAP | ↑ | |||||||
|
| 15 patients | 34.1 ± 12.0 | CD | = | = | ↓ | ↓ | ||||
|
| 15 patients | 34.07 ± 12.03 | CD | = | = | ||||||
|
| 20 hypothyroidism | 34.1 ± 2.4 | Thyroid disease | ↑ | |||||||
|
| 10 hypothyroidism | 53.0 ± 8.0 | Thyroid disease | ↑ | ↓ | = | ↑ | ||||
|
| 4 thyroid hormone resistance | 20.5 (8.0–32.0) | Thyroid disease | = | ↑ | ↓ | |||||
|
| 21 patients | 66.9 ± 1.8 | Type-2 diabetes | = | = | = | = | ↓ | |||
|
| 17 patients | 64.5 ± 7.5 | Type-2 diabetes | = | ↓ | ||||||
|
| 9 patients | 29.4 (19.0–40.0) | WD | ↑ in 6 patients | |||||||
|
| 12 chronic stable | 43.0–70.0 | HE | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | |||||
|
| 20 pre-transplant | 53.0 ± 11.0 | Minimal HE | ↑ | ↑ | ||||||
|
| 36 patients | 58.0 ± 6.7 | end-stage renal disease | = | ↓, = after dialysis | =, ↑ after hemodialysis | = | ||||
|
| 16 patients | 62.0 (40.0–78.0) | PBC | ↑ | ↓ | = | |||||
|
| 11 patients | 51.0 ± 8.0 (41.0–68.0) | PBC | ↓ post-exercise facilitation | |||||||
|
| 15 patients | 58.0 ± 4.0 | Minimal HE | = | ↓ | ||||||
|
| 15 patients | 58.0 ± 7.1 | Minimal HE | = | ↑ | ↓ | |||||
|
| 15 neurological | 28.2 ± 12.1 | WD | ↑ | = | ↓ | = | ↓ | |||
|
| 15 patients | 64.1 ± 10.5 | HE | =, ↓ cerebellar inhibition | |||||||
|
| 11 HE1 | 59.5 ± 3.3 | HE | = | = | = | |||||
|
| 3 NBIA | 31; 41; 55 | NBIA | = | = | ↓ WD | = | ↑ | |||
|
| 18 patients | 18.9 ± 8.69 | WD | ↓ pre/post therapy | = | ||||||
|
| 1 patient | NR | Vit. B12 deficiency | ↑, = upper limbs after therapy | |||||||
|
| 12 frontal atrophy | 56.9 ± 7.1 | Chronic alcoholism | ↑ | |||||||
|
| 62 patients | NR | Chronic alcoholism | ↑ | |||||||
|
| 17 patients | NR | Vit. B12 deficiency | ↑ in 8 out of 12, improve after therapy | |||||||
|
| 1 patient | 44 | Vit. B12 deficiency | ↑, = after therapy | |||||||
|
| 1 patient | 50 | Chronic alcoholism | ↑ | |||||||
|
| 1 patient | 48 | Marchiafava–Bignami syndrome | ↑, = after therapy | = | absent, = after therapy | |||||
|
| 13 AWS patients | 48.4 (26.0–68.0) | Alcohol withdrawal syndrome | = | = | = | ↑, = after riluzole | = | |||
|
| 8 patients | 54.4 (35.0–62.0) | Wernicke–Korsakoff syndrome | = | = | ↓ | = | = | |||
|
| 9 patients | 2.0–70.0 | Herpes simplex encephalitis | =, except for one | |||||||
|
| 65 patients | 2.0–65.0 | Japanese encephalitis | ↑ or absent in 34 | |||||||
|
| 1 patient | 36.0 | Bickerstaff’s brainstem encephalitis | ↑, also cortico-bulbar | |||||||
|
| 34 patients | 28.0 ± 11.0 | NMDAR encephalitis | = | = | = | = | ↓ | |||
|
| 1 patient | 56.0 | Rasmussen encephalitis | ↓ | |||||||
|
| 12 patients | 67.0 ± 9.6 | Post-COVID-19 | = | ↓ (post-pre | ||||||
|
| 12 patients | 67.0 ± 9.6 | Post-COVID-19 | = | ↓ | ↓ (also LICI) | = | ||||
|
| 10 patients | 64.8 ± 7.1 | RBD | = | ↓ | = | = | ||||
|
| 10 PD-RBD | 65.9 ± 6.5 | PD ± RBD | = | ↓ | = | = | ||||
|
| 13 patients | 47.7 ± 9.7 | OSAS | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | |||||
|
| 13 patients | 46.2 ± 9.4 | OSAS | = | ↓ | = | = | ||||
|
| 17 patients | 55.0 ± 12.0 | OSAS | ↑ | ↓ | ||||||
|
| 18 patients | 48.4 (26.0 ± 72.0) | SCA2 | ↑ (lower limbs) | ↑ (lower limbs) | ||||||
|
| 18 patients | 48.4 ± 14.7 | SCA2 | ↑ (lower limbs) | = | ↓ | ↑ | ||||
|
| 2 patients | 26; 31 | SPG11 | ↓ | |||||||
|
| 12 patients | 39.3 ± 8.1 | Sialidosis type I | = | ↓ | = | ↓ | ||||
|
| 24 patiets | 39.0 (18.0–57.0) | CTX | ↑ (especially at lower limbs) | |||||||
|
| 3 patients | 23; 26; 33 | NPC | ↓ | |||||||
|
| 4 patients (2 twins) | 25; 25; 34; 57 | NPC | ↓, = after therapy | = | = | ↓, = after therapy | ||||
|
| 2 patients | 37; 37 | Ch-Ac | = | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | = | |||
|
| 33 patients | 40.5 ± 10.8 (21.0–70.0) | Pre-SCA2 | ↑ (at follow-up) | ↑ (lower limbs, at follow-up) | = |
Each TMS parameter tested is indicated as increased (↑), reduced (↓), or not significantly modified (=) compared to healthy subjects or baseline condition. A non-significant difference does not demonstrate that a given parameter is unaffected by the disease, but it rather indicates that there is no evidence of change beyond the limits for which the study is powered. AWS, alcohol withdrawal syndrome; Ch-Ac, chorea-acanthocytosis; CD, celiac disease; CMCT, central motor conduction time; CTX, cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis; COVID-19, COronaVIrus disease-2019; cSP, contralateral cortical silent period; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy; HE, hepatic encephalopathy, grade 1 (HE1), grade 2 (HE2); iSP, ipsilateral silent period; MS, multiple sclerosis; ICF, intracortical facilitation; LICI, long-interval intracortical inhibition; LTP, long-term potentiation; NBIA, neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation; NPC, Niemann-Pick disease type C; N, number of subjects; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; NR, not reported; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; PBC, primary biliary cirrhosis; PD, Parkinson’s disease; RBD, REM-sleep behavior disorder; rMT, resting motor threshold; SAI, short-latency afferent inhibition; SCA2, spinocerebellar ataxia type 2; SICI, short-interval intracortical inhibition; SPG11, Hereditary spastic paraplegia with thin corpus callosum; WD, Wilson’s disease.
Relevant repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) studies in non-vascular secondary dementia or cognitive disorders.
| References | N. | Age (years) | Disease | Repetitive TMS protocol | Main findings |
|
| 13 patients | 49.0 ± 6.0 | Chronic ethanol abuse | 5 Hz-rTMS over the left M1 (10 stimuli of 120% rMT) before and about 30 min after the intake of ethanol | Acute and chronic ethanol intake alters cortical excitability and short-term plasticity of the primary motor cortex |
|
| 18 test group | 49.0 | Detoxified alcohol-dependence | 10 Hz TMS over the right DLPFC, 20 sessions | Improvement in memory, which correlated with hippocampal brain metabolites detected by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
|
| 39 patients | 41.6 ± 8.63 | Alcohol use disorder | Sham-controlled 10 Hz neuronavigated rTMS over the right DLPFC | rTMS can reduce the emotional impact of images as reflected in blood oxygenation level-dependent response in patients |
|
| 17 patients | 43.3 | Multiple Sclerosis | Real 10-Hz over the right DLPFC, 110% rMT, 60 trains of 5 s, 25 s between trains (total 3,000 biphasic pulses in 30 min) | Improved working memory performance; |
|
| 3 patients | NR | NMDA-R encephalitis | Trains of high-frequency stimulation over the premotor area | Immunoglobulin G of patients markedly enhance the excitability of the motor cortex |
|
| 15 SD healthy volunteers | 24.5 ± 2.7 | Cognitive impairment due to SD | Real 5 Hz over the left UMO, midline | Real rTMS only, delivered to UMO but not to LMO improved working memory |
|
| 27 SD (13 rTMS vs. 14 sham) + 21 non-SD (10 | 23.3 ± 1.2 (active) | Cognitive impairment due to SD | 5 Hz over the left UMO, 100% rMT, 7 s per trial, 35 stimuli per trial. Four 1.5-h sessions performed over the course of a 2-day SD period | Real rTMS group did not show |
|
| 6 SD healthy | 25.00 ± 2.61 | Cognitive impairment due to SD | 5 Hz over the left MFG (group 1) and left MOG (group 2), 100% rMT, single 20 min session (10 s stimulation, 50 s pause) | High-frequency rTMS in different brain targets determined improvement of working memory due to SD |
|
| 17 SD healthy | 23.00 ± 1.37 (21–26) | Cognitive impairment due to SD | 5 Hz over the left DLPFC, 100% rMT, 20 trains of 50 pulses, 50-s intertrain interval, one session (total 1,000 pulses). Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging and working memory test performed during a rested waking period, after SD and rTMS | high-frequency rTMS applied over left DLPFC may contribute to the recovery of the impaired working memory after SD by modulating the neural activity of related brain regions |
|
| 33 real group | 25.8 ± 2.4 25.6 ± 2.4 | Cognitive impairment due to SD | 2 sessions of 10 Hz rTMS (40 trains of 50 pulses, 20-second intertrain interval) over the left DLPFC | Positive effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and frontal activation, alleviating cognitive impairment |
CSP, cortical silent period; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; LMO, lower part middle occipital gyrus; M1, primary motor area; MEPs, motor evoked potentials; MFG, medial frontal gyrus; MOG, medial occipital gyrus; NMDA-R, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; NR, not reported; rMT, resting motor threshold; SD, sleep deprivation; UMO, upper part middle occipital gyrus.
FIGURE 1Flow diagram showing the search strategy, the number of records identified, and the number of included/excluded transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS studies (Moher et al., 2009).