| Literature DB >> 31531006 |
Lin Qiu1, Wujian Mao1, Hongyan Yin1, Hui Tan1, Dengfeng Cheng1, Hongcheng Shi1.
Abstract
The exceptional speed and biorthogonality of the inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder (IEDDA) click chemistry between 1,2,4,5-tetrazines and strained alkene dienophiles have made it promising in the realm of pretargeted imaging and therapy. During the past 10 years, the IEDDA-pretargeted strategies have been tested and have already proven capable of producing images with high tumor-to-background ratios and improving therapeutic effect. This review will focus on recent applications of click chemistry ligations in the pretargeted imaging studies of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and pretargeted radioimmunotherapy investigations. Additionally, the influence factors of stability, reactivity, and pharmacokinetic properties of TCO tag modified immunoconjugates and radiolabeled Tz derivatives were also summarized in this article, which should be carefully considered in the system design in order to develop a successful pretargeted methodology. We hope that this review will not only equip readers with a knowledge of pretargeted methodology based on IEDDA click chemistry but also inspire synthetic chemists and radiochemists to develop pretargeted radiopharmaceutical components in a more innovative way with various influence factors considered.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31531006 PMCID: PMC6732628 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9182476
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.161
Overview of reported pretargeted nuclear imaging and radioimmunotherapy studies based on the IEDDA click chemistry.
| Author (year) | Xenograft model | Target | Immunoconjugate | Tz radioligand | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rossin et al. (2010) [ | LS174T colon cancer | TAG-72 | CC49-PEG12-benzamide-TCO | 111In-DOTA-PEG11-bispyridyl Tz | — |
| Rossin et al. (2013) [ | LS174T colon cancer | TAG-72 | CC49-benzamide-TCO or CC49-PEG12-benzamide-TCO | 111In-DOTA-PEG11-bispyridyl Tz | Axially substituted TCO with bulky linker and no PEG linker compared with Reference [ |
| Rossin et al. (2013) [ | LS174T colon cancer | TAG-72 | CC49-benzamide-TCO | 111In-DOTA-PEG11-bispyridyl Tz | Clearing agent and no PEG linker compared with Reference [ |
| Rossin et al. (2014) [ | LS174T colon cancer | TAG-72 | CC49-acetamide-TCO | 111In-DOTA-PEG11-bispyridyl Tz | Acetamide linker between CC49 and TCO compared with benzamide linker in Reference [ |
| Altai et al. (2016) [ | SKOV-3 ovarian cancer | HER2 | Z2395 (affibody)-PEG4-TCO | 111In-DOTA-PEG10-bispyridyl Tz | — |
| van Duijnhoven et al. (2015) [ | LS174T colon cancer | TAG-72 | AVP04-07 (diabody)-benzamide-TCO | 111In-DOTA-PEG11-bispyridyl Tz | — |
| García et al. (2016) [ | LS174T colon cancer | TAG-72 | CC49-TCO | 99mTc-HYNIC-Tz | — |
| García et al. (2018) [ | B16-F10 melanoma | VEGF | Bevacizumab-TCO | 99mTc-HYNIC-PEG4-Tz99mTc-HYNIC-PEG5-polypeptide-Tz | Polypeptide: Gly-Arg-Glu-Arg-Glu-Lys |
| Yazdani et al. (2016) [ | — | Bone | BP (bisphosphonate)-TCO | 99mTc-Tz complex | — |
| Zeglis et al. (2013) [ | SW1222 colorectal cancer | HuA33 | A33-TCO | 64Cu-NOTA-Tz | — |
| Zeglis et al. (2015) [ | SW1222 colorectal cancer | HuA33 | A33-TCO | 64Cu-NOTA-PEG7-Tz64Cu-SarAr-Tz | 64Cu-SarAr-Tz net charge (+2) |
| Evans et al. (2014) [ | A431 cutaneous squamous cancer | EGFR | Cetuximab-PEG4-TCO | 68Ga-DOTA-Tz | — |
| Nichols et al. (2014) [ | LS174 T colon cancer | HuA33 | A33-TCO | 68Ga-DTPA aminodextran Tz-coated polymer | Aminodextran polymer: 16 kDa |
| Devaraj et al. (2012) [ | LS174 T colon cancer | HuA33 | A33-TCO | 18F aminodextran Tz-coated polymer (18F-PMT10 and PMT40) | Aminodextran polymer: 10 and 40 kDa |
| Meyer et al. (2016) [ | BxPC3 pancreatic cancer | CA19.9 | 5B1-TCO | Al[18F]-NOTA-PEG11-Tz | — |
| Shi et al. (2018) [ | HCT116 colon cancer | EGFR | Cetuximab-Tz and panitumumab-Tz | Al[18F]-NOTA-TD (a Reppe anhydride derivative) | An inverse strategy and replaced TCO with a Reppe anhydride derivative |
| Denk et al. (2016) [ | — | Lung | MSNs-TCO and MSNs-s-TCO | 11C-Tz | First11C-labeled Tz |
| Keinänen et al. (2017) [ | — | Spleen and liver | NPs-TCO | 18F-Tz | — |
| Keinänen et al. (2017) [ | A431 epidermoid carcinoma BT-474 ductal carcinoma | EGFR HER2 | Cetuximab-TCO and trastuzumab-TCO | 18F-Tz | — |
| Houghton et al. (2017) [ | BxPC3 pancreatic cancer | CA19.9 | 5B1-TCO | 177Lu-DOTA-PEG7-Tz177Lu-CHX-A”-DTPA-PEG7-Tz | — |
| Membreno et al. (2018) [ | SW1222 colorectal cancer | HuA33 | A33-TCO | 177Lu-DOTA-PEG7-Tz | — |
| Shah et al. (2017) [ | LS174 T colon cancer | TAG-72 | CC49-TCO | 212Pb-DOTA-PEG11-bispyridyl Tz | — |
Figure 1Pretargeted PET imaging comparison of A33-TCO/64Cu-NOTA-Tz (A1-4), A33-TCO/64Cu-NOTA-PEG7-Tz (B1-3), and A33-TCO/64Cu-SarAr-Tz (C1-3). Mice bearing subcutaneous SW1222 xenografts were administered A33-TCO via tail vein injection. After 24 h, the same mice were administered 64Cu-NOTA-Tz, 64Cu-NOTA-PEG7-Tz, and 64Cu-SarAr-Tz, respectively. All three 64Cu-labeled Tz radioligands were successfully applied to pretargeted experiments and delineated the tumor clearly (solid white arrows). 64Cu-NOTA-Tz was eliminated slowly through the gastrointestinal pathway (dashed white arrows). 64Cu-SarAr-Tz cleared quickly and primarily through the urinary tract, and 64Cu-NOTA-PEG7-Tz represented an intermediate case with excretion through both the gastrointestinal and urinary tracts (dashed white arrows) [26, 27].
Figure 2Structures of the small molecular 11C- and 18F-labeled tetrazines [36, 42, 43].
Figure 3Normalized tumor volume for each group of mice in the pretargeted huA33-TCO/177Lu-DOTA-PEG7-Tz radioimmunotherapy study. The two control groups received either huA33-TCO (blue) or Tz radioligand (red) only. The three treatment groups received huA33-TCO followed 24 h later by 18.5 (green), 37.0 (purple), or 55.5 (orange) MBq of 177Lu-DOTA-PEG7-Tz. Striking differences were observed between treatment and control groups [40].
Figure 4Stability and reactivity of various tetrazines and dienophiles [45].
Comparison of the molecular net charge and the primary elimination route for different radiolabeled Tz derivatives.
| Radiolabeled Tz derivatives | Molecular net charge | Primary elimination route |
|---|---|---|
| Al[18F]-NODA-Tz | 0 | Hepatic and intestinal excretion |
| 68Ga-NODA-Tz | +1 | Renal excretion |
| Al[18F]-NOTA-lysine-Tz | 0 | Hepatic and intestinal excretion |
| Al[18F]-NOTA-(lysine)2-Tz | +1 | Renal excretion |
| Al[18F]-NOTA-(lysine)3-Tz | +2 | Renal excretion |
| 64Cu-NOTA-Tz | −1 | Hepatic and intestinal excretion |
| 64Cu-NOTA-PEG7-Tz | −1 | Hepatic and intestinal excretion |
| 64Cu-SarAr-Tz | +2 | Renal excretion |