Literature DB >> 31507282

Pharmacy Students' Perspectives on Interprofessional Learning in a Simulated Patient Care Ward Environment.

Louise E Curley1, Maree Jensen1, Carolyn McNabb1, Sanya Ram1, Jane Torrie2, Tanisha Jowsey3, Maureen McDonald1.   

Abstract

Objective. To assess pharmacy students' opinions of an interprofessional learning (IPL) course in their final year of the Bachelor of Pharmacy program at The University of Auckland. Methods. Pharmacy students participated in the second day of a two-day simulation-based course, WardSim, alongside medical and nursing students in an acute care, hospital ward setting. After finishing the course, all students were asked to complete a questionnaire. The responses of pharmacy, nursing, and medical students on the scaled questions were compared. An in-depth thematic analysis of the pharmacy students' responses to the open-ended questions was completed using an iterative process. Results. Significant differences were found among the students' responses regarding the prioritization of care, systematic assessment of patients, and communication strategies. Pharmacy students had less favourable responses regarding the IPL experience than medical and nursing students. However, overall responses were positive. Some of the themes that emerged among the pharmacy students' responses included: learning communication tools, being assertive in communicating with other health care professionals, and understanding their own and others' roles in the health care team. Furthermore, some pharmacy students reported feeling underprepared for and underutilized during patient care scenarios. Conclusion. An IPL experience in an acute patient care setting demonstrated clear and beneficial learning outcomes for pharmacy students, especially in regards to communicating and understanding their roles and those of others on their team. Tailoring the pre-work or scenarios for the IPL experience to be more pharmacy orientated and having pharmacy students participate on both days may improve the preparedness for IPL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interprofessional education; pharmacy students; simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31507282      PMCID: PMC6718511          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  37 in total

1.  The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS).

Authors:  G Parsell; J Bligh
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 2.  Learning to work together: using the presage, process, product (3P) model to highlight decisions and possibilities.

Authors:  Della Freeth; Scott Reeves
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.338

3.  Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps.

Authors:  Kathleen M Sutcliffe; Elizabeth Lewton; Marilynn M Rosenthal
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Use of interdisciplinary simulation to understand perceptions of team members' roles.

Authors:  T Kim Rodehorst; Susan L Wilhelm; Linda Jensen
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Which is the correct statistical test to use?

Authors:  Evie McCrum-Gardner
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 1.651

6.  Using SBAR to improve communication in interprofessional rehabilitation teams.

Authors:  Nancy Boaro; Carol Fancott; Ross Baker; Karima Velji; Angie Andreoli
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.338

7.  Interprofessional initiatives at the University of Washington.

Authors:  Peggy S Odegard; Lynne Robins; Nanci Murphy; Basia Belza; Doug Brock; Thomas H Gallagher; Taryn Lindhorst; Tom Morton; Doug Schaad; Pamela Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  An interprofessional activity using standardized patients.

Authors:  Sarah M Westberg; Jeff Adams; Kathleen Thiede; Timothy P Stratton; Melissa A Bumgardner
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Using a human patient simulation mannequin to teach interdisciplinary team skills to pharmacy students.

Authors:  Rosemarie Fernandez; Dennis Parker; James S Kalus; Douglas Miller; Scott Compton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 10.  A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9.

Authors:  M Hammick; D Freeth; I Koppel; S Reeves; H Barr
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.650

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ward calls not so scary for medical students after interprofessional simulation course: a mixed-methods cohort evaluation study.

Authors:  Tanisha Jowsey; Tsu-Chieh Wendy Yu; Gihan Ganeshanantham; Jane Torrie; Alan F Merry; Warwick Bagg; Kira Bacal; Jennifer Weller
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2018-07-09

2.  Effectiveness of case-based teaching of cardiovascular physiology in clinical pharmacy students.

Authors:  Ahmed A Alsunni; Nazish Rafique
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2020-12-22

3.  Changes in medical students´ and anesthesia technician trainees´ attitudes towards interprofessionality - experience from an interprofessional simulation-based course.

Authors:  Veronika Becker; Nana Jedlicska; Laura Scheide; Alexandra Nest; Stephan Kratzer; Dominik Hinzmann; Marjo Wijnen-Meijer; Pascal O Berberat; Rainer Haseneder
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Performativity, identity formation and professionalism: Ethnographic research to explore student experiences of clinical simulation training.

Authors:  Tanisha Jowsey; Lynne Petersen; Chris Mysko; Pauline Cooper-Ioelu; Pauline Herbst; Craig S Webster; Andy Wearn; Dianne Marshall; Jane Torrie; Meng-Jiun Penny Lin; Peter Beaver; Johanne Egan; Kira Bacal; Anne O'Callaghan; Jennifer Weller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.