Literature DB >> 35520465

Ward calls not so scary for medical students after interprofessional simulation course: a mixed-methods cohort evaluation study.

Tanisha Jowsey1, Tsu-Chieh Wendy Yu1, Gihan Ganeshanantham1, Jane Torrie2, Alan F Merry3, Warwick Bagg3, Kira Bacal4, Jennifer Weller1.   

Abstract

Background: An interprofessional simulation 'ward call' course-WardSim-was designed and implemented for medical, pharmacy and nursing students. We evaluated this intervention and also explored students' experiences and ideas of both the course and of ward calls.
Methods: We used a mixed-methods cohort study design including survey and focus groups. Descriptive statistical analysis and general purpose thematic analysis were undertaken.
Results: Survey respondents who participated in WardSim subsequently attended more ward calls and took a more active role than the control cohort, with 34% of the intervention cohort attending ward calls under indirect supervision, compared with 15% from the control cohort (P=0.004). Focus group participants indicated that the situation they were most anxious about facing in the future was attending a ward call. They reported that their collective experiences on WardSim alleviated such anxiety because it offered them experiential learning that they could then apply in real-life situations. They said they had learnt how to work effectively with other team members, to take on a leadership role, to make differential diagnoses under pressure and to effectively communicate and seek help. Conclusions: An interprofessional, simulated ward call course increased medical students' sense of preparedness for and participation in ward calls in the next calendar year. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; education environment; interprofessional; medicine; simulation < teaching and learning

Year:  2018        PMID: 35520465      PMCID: PMC8990197          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  16 in total

Review 1.  Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; S Barry Issenberg; Elaine R Cohen; Jeffrey H Barsuk; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Improving teamwork climate in operating theatres: the shift from multiprofessionalismto interprofessionalism.

Authors:  Alan Bleakley; James Boyden; Adrian Hobbs; Linda Walsh; Jon Allard
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.338

3.  Developing interprofessional simulation in the undergraduate setting: experience with five different professional groups.

Authors:  Sharon Buckley; Marianne Hensman; Susan Thomas; Robert Dudley; Geraldine Nevin; Jamie Coleman
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.338

4.  Interprofessional collaboration among junior doctors and nurses in the hospital setting.

Authors:  Jennifer M Weller; Mark Barrow; Sue Gasquoine
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Teaching interprofessional teamwork in medical and nursing education in Norway: a content analysis.

Authors:  Ingunn Aase; Karina Aase; Peter Dieckmann
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 2.338

6.  The transition from medical student to junior doctor: today's experiences of Tomorrow's Doctors.

Authors:  Nicola Brennan; Oonagh Corrigan; Jon Allard; Julian Archer; Rebecca Barnes; Alan Bleakley; Tracey Collett; Sam Regan de Bere
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Pharmacy Students' Perspectives on Interprofessional Learning in a Simulated Patient Care Ward Environment.

Authors:  Louise E Curley; Maree Jensen; Carolyn McNabb; Sanya Ram; Jane Torrie; Tanisha Jowsey; Maureen McDonald
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 8.  A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9.

Authors:  M Hammick; D Freeth; I Koppel; S Reeves; H Barr
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 9.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

Authors:  S Barry Issenberg; William C McGaghie; Emil R Petrusa; David Lee Gordon; Ross J Scalese
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.650

10.  'He's going to be a doctor in August': a narrative interview study of medical students' and their educators' experiences of aligned and misaligned assistantships.

Authors:  Owen Meurig Jones; Chiemeka Okeke; Alison Bullock; Stephanie E Wells; Lynn V Monrouxe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.