| Literature DB >> 31484470 |
Mahanom Hussin1,2, Azizah Abdul Hamid3, Faridah Abas1,4, Nurul Shazini Ramli1, Ahmad Haniff Jaafar1, Suri Roowi2, Nordiana Abdul Majid1, Mohd Sabri Pak Dek5.
Abstract
Herbs that are usually recognized as medicinal plants are well known for their therapeutic effects and are traditionally used to treat numerous diseases, including aging. This study aimed to evaluate the metabolite variations among six selected herbs namely Curcurma longa, Oenanthe javanica, Vitex negundo, Pluchea indica, Cosmos caudatus and Persicaria minus using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) coupled with multivariate data analysis (MVDA). The free radical scavenging activity of the extract was measured by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2-azinobis(3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay. The anti-aging property was characterized by anti-elastase and anti-collagenase inhibitory activities. The results revealed that P. minus showed the highest radical scavenging activities and anti-aging properties. The partial least squares (PLS) biplot indicated the presence of potent metabolites in P. minus such as quercetin, quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (quercitrin), myricetin derivatives, catechin, isorhamnetin, astragalin and apigenin. It can be concluded that P. minus can be considered as a potential source for an anti-aging ingredient and also a good free radical eradicator. Therefore, P. minus could be used in future development in anti-aging researches and medicinal ingredient preparations.Entities:
Keywords: collagenase inhibitor; compound profiling; elastase inhibitor; metabolomics; multivariate data analysis; proton NMR; radical scavenging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31484470 PMCID: PMC6749213 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24173208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Radical scavenging activity of selected herbs leaves. A: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay, B: 2,2-azinobis(3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assay, C: Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay, IC50: extract concentration required for 50% inhibition. Means with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 2Inhibition of enzymes activity by selected herb extracts at 100 ug/mL. A: Elastase inhibitory activity, B: Collagenase inhibitory activity. Positive control N-Methoxysuccinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Chloro (N Methoxy) and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) concentration at 12.5 ug/mL. Means with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 3Full 1H-NMR spectra of selected herbs (A) and expanded 1H-NMR spectra of aromatic region from δ 5.5 to 9.0 (B). a: P. indica, b: C. longa, c: P. minus, d: V. negundo, e: O. javanica, f: C. caudatus. The numbering of the signals refer to the metabolites listed in Table 1.
1H-NMR characteristic signals of identified metabolites in selected herbs.
| Metabolites | 1H-NMR Characteristics Signals | Herbs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Quercetin | 6.83 (d, | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Quercetin 3- | 6.83 (d, | + | + | − | + | + | + |
| (3) Quercetin 3- | 6.86 (d, | + | + | − | + | + | + |
| Quercetin 3- | 7.64 (s) | − | − | + | + | + | + |
| (5) Quercetin 3- | 7.47 (dd, | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| Rutin | 6.95 (d, | − | + | + | − | + | + |
| Myricetin derivatives | 7.05 (s) | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| Catechin | 4.59 (d, | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Epicatechin | 4.30 (s) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Isorhamnetin | 3.84 (s) | − | − | + | − | + | + |
| Astragalin | 6.85 (d, | − | − | − | + | − | + |
| Chlorogenic acid | 2.08 (m) | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| (13) Gallic acid | 7.03 (s) | + | + | − | − | − | + |
| Coumaric acid | 7.17 (d, | − | + | − | − | + | + |
| Ascorbic acid | 4.54 (d, | − | − | + | − | − | + |
| (16) α-glucose | 5.20 (d, | − | − | + | − | + | + |
| (17) β-glucose | 4.62 (d, | + | + | + | − | + | + |
| (18) Fructose | 4.20 (d, | + | + | + | + | − | + |
| (19) Sucrose | 5.44 (d, | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| (20) Fatty acid | 1.34 (m) | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| (21) Formic acid | 8.48 (s) | + | − | − | − | + | − |
| (22) Fumaric acid | 6.56 (s) | − | + | − | − | − | − |
| (23) Choline | 3.24 (s) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| (24) Alanine | 1.51 (d, | + | + | − | + | + | + |
| (25) Valine | 1.08 (d, | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| (26) 3-methylxanthine | 8.02 (s) | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| (27) Serotonin | 7.28 (s) | + | − | + | − | − | − |
| (28) Apigenin | 6.95 (d, | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| (29) | 1.72 (s) | + | − | + | − | − | − |
+: presence/strong signal of a particular metabolites in the herb extracts; −: absence/weaker signal of a particular metabolites in the herb extracts.
Figure 4The principal component analysis (PCA) score plot (A) and the loading column plots (B) of the 1H-NMR data representing all the selected herbs. The numbering of the signals refers the to the metabolites in Table 1.
Figure 5The biplots obtained from partial least squares (PLS), indicating the relationship of the metabolites variations with bioactivities tested in selected herbs. A: Radical scavenging activity; B: Anti-aging properties. The numbering of the signals refers to the metabolites in Table 1.
The variable importance in the projection (VIP) values of the significant metabolites contributing to the separation and bioactivities in the biplots (PLS model).
| Chemical Shift (ppm) | Metabolites | VIP Values | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radical Scavenging Activity Biplot | Anti-#ging Properties Biplot | ||
| 6.78 | Quercetin 3- | 2.01017 | 2.43408 |
| 6.94 | Apigenin | 1.86661 | 1.99206 |
| 6.58 | Astragalin | 1.31507 | 1.43942 |
| 6.86 | Quercetin | 1.30401 | 1.43471 |
| 2.82 | Catechin | 1.07724 | 1.24570 |
| 6.22 | Isorhamnetin | 1.03878 | 1.23268 |
Figure 6Relative quantification of identified metabolites in leaves of selected herbs based on the mean peak area of 1H-NMR signals. Means with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05) within a metabolite.