| Literature DB >> 31484331 |
Mindy A Patterson1, Joy Nolte Fong2, Madhura Maiya2,3, Stephanie Kung2, Araz Sarkissian2, Nezar Nashef2, Wanyi Wang4.
Abstract
Resistant starch (RS) has been shown to improve postprandial glycemia and insulin sensitivity in adults with metabolic syndrome. RS is found naturally in potatoes, where the amount varies based on cooking method and serving temperature. Thirty females with a mean BMI of 32.8 ± 3.7 kg/m2, fasting glucose of 110.5 mg/dL, and insulin of 10.3 µIU/L, completed this randomized, crossover study. A quantity of 250 g of boiled (low RS) and baked then chilled (high RS) russet potatoes were consumed on two separate occasions. Glycemic (glucose and insulin) and incretin response, subjective satiety, and dietary intake were measured. Results showed that the chilled potato elicited significant reductions at 15 and 30 min in glucose (4.8% and 9.2%), insulin (25.8% and 22.6%), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) (41.1% and 37.6%), respectively. The area under the curve for insulin and GIP were significantly lower after the chilled potato, but no differences were seen in glucose, glucagon-like peptide-1, and peptide YY, or overall subjective satiety. A higher carbohydrate and glycemic index but lower fat diet was consumed 48-hours following the chilled potato than the boiled potato. This study demonstrates that consuming chilled potatoes higher in RS can positively impact the glycemic response in females with elevated fasting glucose and insulin.Entities:
Keywords: dietary intake; glucose homeostasis; incretins; resistant starch; subjective satiety
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31484331 PMCID: PMC6769955 DOI: 10.3390/nu11092066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Subject flow through the study protocol.
Subject characteristics (n = 30).
| Variables | Mean ± Standard Deviation (SD) |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 29.6 ± 6.0 |
| Body weight (kg) | 85.6 ± 11.8 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 32.8 ± 3.7 |
| Percent fat mass | 43.6 ± 4.9 |
| Percent fat-free mass | 56.4 ± 4.9 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 37.9 ± 8.0 |
| Lean mass (kg) | 48.5 ± 5.1 |
Figure 2Biomarker responses from fasting to 120 min following boiled (red line) and chilled (blue line) potato intake. * p < 0.05 between groups using non-parametric Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; PYY, peptide YY; GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic-peptide.
Figure 3Comparison of the area under the curve (AUC0–120 min) biomarker response between boiled and chilled potato intake. * p < 0.05 between groups using non-parametric Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. Red color refers to the AUC(0–120 min) for the boiled potato; blue color refers to the AUC(0–120 min) for the chilled potato. GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; PYY, peptide YY; GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic-peptide.
Comparison of mean nutrient intake before and after each potato intervention.
| Variable | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Pre | 1828 ± 842 | 0.329 | 1933 ± 891 | 0.528 | |
| Post | 1987 ± 1223 | 1843 ± 1220 | |||
| Difference | 160 ± 865 | −67 ± 774 | 0.185 | ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 211.2 ± 95.9 | 0.55 | 206.0 ± 83.8 | 0.457 | |
| Post | 223.9 ± 140.6 | 218.6 ± 130.3 | |||
| Difference | 12.7 ± 112.7 | 16.1 ± 90.8 | 0.876 | ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 76.6 ± 45.2 | 0.753 | 77.7 ± 34.7 | 0.895 | |
| Post | 78.5 ± 49.5 | 76.8 ± 52.8 | |||
| Difference | 1.9 ± 32.0 | −1.2 ± 37.2 | 0.72 | ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 76.6 ± 40.5 | 0.328 | 89.5 ± 55.6 | 0.065 | |
| Post | 84.5 ± 60.4 | 75.1 ± 62.2 | |||
| Difference | 7.9 ± 42.8 | −13.2 ± 41.4 |
| ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 27.7 ± 15.7 | 0.608 | 31.9 ± 18.6 | 0.095 | |
| Post | 28.9 ± 19.0 | 26.9 ± 22.7 | |||
| Difference | 1.2 ± 12.9 | −4.5 ± 16.0 | 0.09 | ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 17.6 ± 9.7 | 0.294 | 22.0 ± 15.0 | 0.11 | |
| Post | 20.2 ± 16.7 | 18.1 ± 14.2 | |||
| Difference | 2.6 ± 13.3 | −3.9 ± 13.4 |
| ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 24.8 ± 13.6 | 0.303 | 28.5 ± 20.6 |
| |
| Post | 28.2 ± 21.2 | 23.7 ± 21.6 | |||
| Difference | 3.4 ± 17.6 | −4.2 ± 12.5 |
| ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 2.3 ± 1.8 | 0.679 | 2.4 ± 1.6 | 0.608 | |
| Post | 2.2 ± 1.3 | 2.6 ± 2.9 | |||
| Difference | −0.1 ± 1.6 | 0.3 ± 2.7 | 0.345 | ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 46.4 ± 9.3 | 0.488 | 44.0 ± 8.7 |
| |
| Post | 45.3 ± 10.7 | 49.3 ± 11.7 | |||
| Difference | −1.1 ± 8.7 | 5.4 ± 13.0 |
| ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 16.6 ± 5.1 | 0.875 | 16.8 ± 4.6 | 0.688 | |
| Post | 16.4 ± 4.6 | 16.4 ± 5.3 | |||
| Difference | −0.2 ± 5.6 | −0.7 ± 5.4 | 0.692 | ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 36.5 ± 6.6 | 0.798 | 38.3 ± 6.8 |
| |
| Post | 36.2 ± 8.7 | 33.9 ± 9.1 | |||
| Difference | −0.4 ± 7.6 | −4.3 ± 11.0 | 0.088 | ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 14.8 ± 7.0 | 0.502 | 15.6 ± 6.2 | 0.418 | |
| Pro | 15.8 ± 10.2 | 16.7 ± 8.9 | |||
| Difference | 1.1 ± 8.3 | 1.5 ± 7.0 | 0.813 | ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 59.8 ± 4.5 | 0.833 | 60.2 ± 4.0 |
| |
| Post | 60.0 ± 3.7 | 64.3 ± 7.3 | |||
| Difference | 0.2 ± 5.9 | 4.1 ± 6.5 |
| ||
|
| |||||
| Pre | 118.2 ± 52.8 | 0.539 | 115.5 ± 49.0 | 0.171 | |
| Post | 125.1 ± 78.3 | 130.0 ± 76.9 | |||
| Difference | 6.9 ± 59.8 | 15.3 ± 52.6 | 0.486 |
* Glycemic index was calculated using glucose as the reference. The bold shows the significant differences.