OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of variety and cooking method on glycemic response and glycemic index of common North American potatoes. DESIGN: Study 1: subjects consumed 200 g Russet or white potatoes that were either (a) precooked, refrigerated, and reheated (precooked) or (b) cooked and consumed immediately (day-cooked). Incremental area under the curve was determined. Study 2: subjects consumed 50 g carbohydrate portions of white bread or potatoes (six different varieties and two different cooking methods). Glycemic index values were calculated. In both studies meals were consumed after a 10- to 12-hour overnight fast and finger-prick capillary-blood glucose was measured before and at intervals for 2 hours after consumption. SUBJECTS: The study groups were as follows: Study 1 comprised four men and six women, aged 20 to 44 and Study 2 comprised 11 men and one woman, aged 18 to 50. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Repeated measures analysis of variance with Newman-Kuels to protect for multiple comparisons (criterion of significance two-tailed P <.05). RESULTS: Study 1: Precooked Russet potatoes elicited lower area under the curve than day-cooked (P <.05), while precooking had no effect on boiled white potatoes. Study 2: The glycemic index values of potatoes varied significantly, depending on the variety and cooking method used (P =.003) ranging from intermediate (boiled red potatoes consumed cold: 56) to moderately high (roasted California white potatoes: 72; baked US Russet potatoes: 77) to high (instant mashed potatoes: 88; boiled red potatoes: 89). CONCLUSIONS: The glycemic index of potatoes is influenced by variety and method of cooking and US Russet potatoes have only a moderately high glycemic index. Individuals who wish to minimize dietary glycemic index can be advised to precook potatoes and consume them cold or reheated.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of variety and cooking method on glycemic response and glycemic index of common North American potatoes. DESIGN: Study 1: subjects consumed 200 g Russet or white potatoes that were either (a) precooked, refrigerated, and reheated (precooked) or (b) cooked and consumed immediately (day-cooked). Incremental area under the curve was determined. Study 2: subjects consumed 50 g carbohydrate portions of white bread or potatoes (six different varieties and two different cooking methods). Glycemic index values were calculated. In both studies meals were consumed after a 10- to 12-hour overnight fast and finger-prick capillary-blood glucose was measured before and at intervals for 2 hours after consumption. SUBJECTS: The study groups were as follows: Study 1 comprised four men and six women, aged 20 to 44 and Study 2 comprised 11 men and one woman, aged 18 to 50. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Repeated measures analysis of variance with Newman-Kuels to protect for multiple comparisons (criterion of significance two-tailed P <.05). RESULTS: Study 1: Precooked Russet potatoes elicited lower area under the curve than day-cooked (P <.05), while precooking had no effect on boiled white potatoes. Study 2: The glycemic index values of potatoes varied significantly, depending on the variety and cooking method used (P =.003) ranging from intermediate (boiled red potatoes consumed cold: 56) to moderately high (roasted California white potatoes: 72; baked US Russet potatoes: 77) to high (instant mashed potatoes: 88; boiled red potatoes: 89). CONCLUSIONS: The glycemic index of potatoes is influenced by variety and method of cooking and US Russet potatoes have only a moderately high glycemic index. Individuals who wish to minimize dietary glycemic index can be advised to precook potatoes and consume them cold or reheated.
Authors: James E Gangwisch; Lauren Hale; Lorena Garcia; Dolores Malaspina; Mark G Opler; Martha E Payne; Rebecca C Rossom; Dorothy Lane Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Alexandra Rankovic; Jennifer L Adolphe; D Dan Ramdath; Anna K Shoveller; Adronie Verbrugghe Journal: J Anim Sci Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 3.159
Authors: James E Gangwisch; Lauren Hale; Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Lydia Choi; Erin S LeBlanc; Dolores Malaspina; Mark G Opler; Aladdin H Shadyab; James M Shikany; Linda Snetselaar; Oleg Zaslavsky; Dorothy Lane Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Sutton Mooney; Liyuan Chen; Christina Kühn; Roy Navarre; N Richard Knowles; Hanjo Hellmann Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 3.411