Literature DB >> 32479264

A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception.

Matthias Fritsche1, Eelke Spaak1, Floris P de Lange1.   

Abstract

Human perceptual decisions can be repelled away from (repulsive adaptation) or attracted towards recent visual experience (attractive serial dependence). It is currently unclear whether and how these repulsive and attractive biases interact during visual processing and what computational principles underlie these history dependencies. Here we disentangle repulsive and attractive biases by exploring their respective timescales. We find that perceptual decisions are concurrently attracted towards the short-term perceptual history and repelled from stimuli experienced up to minutes into the past. The temporal pattern of short-term attraction and long-term repulsion cannot be captured by an ideal Bayesian observer model alone. Instead, it is well captured by an ideal observer model with efficient encoding and Bayesian decoding of visual information in a slowly changing environment. Concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in perceptual decisions may thus be the consequence of the need for visual processing to simultaneously satisfy constraints of efficiency and stability.
© 2020, Fritsche et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; efficient coding; history biases; human; neuroscience; sensory adaptation; serial dependence; visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32479264      PMCID: PMC7286693          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.55389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  56 in total

1.  The temporal course of recovery from brief (sub-second) adaptations to spatial contrast.

Authors:  Andrea Pavan; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti; Gianluca Campana
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Space and time in visual context.

Authors:  Odelia Schwartz; Anne Hsu; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Ghosts in the machine: memory interference from the previous trial.

Authors:  Charalampos Papadimitriou; Afreen Ferdoash; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spontaneous repulsive adaptation in the absence of attractive serial dependence.

Authors:  Michele Fornaciai; Joonkoo Park
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Attractive Serial Dependence in the Absence of an Explicit Task.

Authors:  Michele Fornaciai; Joonkoo Park
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-01-30

6.  Untangling perceptual memory: hysteresis and adaptation map into separate cortical networks.

Authors:  Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Christian C Ruff; Andreea Lazar; Frauke C Leitner; Wolf Singer; Lucia Melloni
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  A visual sense of number.

Authors:  David Burr; John Ross
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Adaptation improves performance on a visual search task.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wissig; Carlyn A Patterson; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Laws of concatenated perception: Vision goes for novelty, decisions for perseverance.

Authors:  David Pascucci; Giovanni Mancuso; Elisa Santandrea; Chiara Della Libera; Gijs Plomp; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Error-correcting dynamics in visual working memory.

Authors:  Matthew F Panichello; Brian DePasquale; Jonathan W Pillow; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  15 in total

1.  A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Eelke Spaak; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Rule-based and stimulus-based cues bias auditory decisions via different computational and physiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Nathan Tardiff; Lalitta Suriya-Arunroj; Yale E Cohen; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Flexible top-down control in the interaction between working memory and perception.

Authors:  Chunyue Teng; Jacqueline M Fulvio; Jiefeng Jiang; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

4.  Attractive serial dependence overcomes repulsive neuronal adaptation.

Authors:  Timothy C Sheehan; John T Serences
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 9.593

5.  Serial dependence and representational momentum in single-trial perceptual decisions.

Authors:  D Pascucci; G Plomp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Serial dependence revealed in history-dependent perceptual templates.

Authors:  Yuki Murai; David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 10.900

7.  Brief Stimuli Cast a Persistent Long-Term Trace in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Samuel G Solomon; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.709

8.  Serial dependence alters perceived object appearance.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Stimulus uncertainty predicts serial dependence in orientation judgements.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Gallagher; Christopher P Benton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Concurrent visual working memory bias in sequential integration of approximate number.

Authors:  Zhiqi Kang; Bernhard Spitzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.