Literature DB >> 34330776

History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.

Kirsten C S Adam1, John T Serences2,3,4.   

Abstract

To find important objects, we must focus on our goals, ignore distractions, and take our changing environment into account. This is formalized in models of visual search whereby goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven factors are integrated into a priority map that guides attention. Stimulus history robustly influences where attention is allocated even when the physical stimulus is the same: when a salient distractor is repeated over time, it captures attention less effectively. A key open question is how we come to ignore salient distractors when they are repeated. Goal-driven accounts propose that we use an active, expectation-driven mechanism to attenuate the distractor signal (e.g., predictive coding), whereas stimulus-driven accounts propose that the distractor signal is attenuated because of passive changes to neural activity and inter-item competition (e.g., adaptation). To test these competing accounts, we measured item-specific fMRI responses in human visual cortex during a visual search task where trial history was manipulated (colors unpredictably switched or were repeated). Consistent with a stimulus-driven account of history-based distractor suppression, we found that repeated singleton distractors were suppressed starting in V1, and distractor suppression did not increase in later visual areas. In contrast, we observed signatures of goal-driven target enhancement that were absent in V1, increased across visual areas, and were not modulated by stimulus history. Our data suggest that stimulus history does not alter goal-driven expectations, but rather modulates canonically stimulus-driven sensory responses to contribute to a temporally integrated representation of priority.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Visual search refers to our ability to find what we are looking for in a cluttered visual world (e.g., finding your keys). To perform visual search, we must integrate information about our goals (e.g., "find the red keychain"), the environment (e.g., salient items capture your attention), and changes to the environment (i.e., stimulus history). Although stimulus history impacts behavior, the neural mechanisms that mediate history-driven effects remain debated. Here, we leveraged fMRI and multivariate analysis techniques to measure history-driven changes to the neural representation of items during visual search. We found that stimulus history influenced the representation of a salient "pop-out" distractor starting in V1, suggesting that stimulus history operates via modulations of early sensory processing rather than goal-driven expectations.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attentional selection; fMRI; priority; salience; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34330776      PMCID: PMC8460139          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3099-20.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  126 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal representations of cognitive state: reward or attention?

Authors:  John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting.

Authors:  John T Serences; Steven Yantis; Andrew Culberson; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity.

Authors:  A Karni; D Sagi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The ignoring paradox: cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina.

Authors:  M V Srinivasan; S B Laughlin; A Dubs
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-11-22

6.  Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Martha Forloines; Zhiheng Zhou; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  John-Dylan Haynes; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-24       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Decoding and reconstructing color from responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Gijs Joost Brouwer; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Value-based modulations in human visual cortex.

Authors:  John T Serences
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Visual topography of human intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Jascha D Swisher; Mark A Halko; Lotfi B Merabet; Stephanie A McMains; David C Somers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Oculomotor suppression of abrupt onsets versus color singletons.

Authors:  Owen J Adams; Eric Ruthruff; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Priming of probabilistic attentional templates.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-07-13

3.  Testing the underlying processes leading to learned distractor rejection: Learned oculomotor avoidance.

Authors:  Brad T Stilwell; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Perceptual learning with dichoptic attention tasks improves attentional modulation in V1 and IPS and reduces interocular suppression in human amblyopia.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Spero C Nicholas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Cognitive Control as a Multivariate Optimization Problem.

Authors:  Harrison Ritz; Xiamin Leng; Amitai Shenhav
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Ten simple rules to study distractor suppression.

Authors:  Malte Wöstmann; Viola S Störmer; Jonas Obleser; Douglas A Addleman; Søren K Andersen; Nicholas Gaspelin; Joy J Geng; Steven J Luck; MaryAnn P Noonan; Heleen A Slagter; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 10.885

7.  A novel method for utilizing dichoptic attention tasks in amblyopic training.

Authors:  Chuan Hou
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2022-08-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.