Literature DB >> 32711366

The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation.

Andrei G Pakhomov1, Olga N Pakhomova2.   

Abstract

Conventional electric stimuli of micro- and millisecond duration excite or activate cells at voltages 10-100 times below the electroporation threshold. This ratio is remarkably different for nanosecond electric pulses (nsEP), which caused excitation and activation only at or above the electroporation threshold in diverse cell lines, primary cardiomyocytes, neurons, and chromaffin cells. Depolarization to the excitation threshold often results from (or is assisted by) the loss of the resting membrane potential due to ion leaks across the membrane permeabilized by nsEP. Slow membrane resealing and the build-up of electroporation damages prevent repetitive excitation by nsEP. However, peripheral nerves and muscles are exempt from this rule and withstand multiple cycles of excitation by nsEP without the loss of function or signs of electroporation. We show that the damage-free excitation by nsEP may be enabled by the membrane charging time constant sufficiently large to (1) cap the peak transmembrane voltage during nsEP below the electroporation threshold, and (2) extend the post-nsEP depolarization long enough to activate voltage-gated ion channels. The low excitatory efficacy of nsEP compared to longer pulses makes them advantageous for medical applications where the neuromuscular excitation is an unwanted side effect, such as electroporation-based cancer and tissue ablation.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electropermeabilization; Electroporation; Electrostimulation; Nanosecond pulse stimulation; Nanosecond pulses; nsPEF

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32711366      PMCID: PMC7511247          DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2020.107598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry        ISSN: 1567-5394            Impact factor:   5.373


  57 in total

1.  Life cycle of an electropore: field-dependent and field-independent steps in pore creation and annihilation.

Authors:  Zachary A Levine; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Quantal charge redistributions accompanying the structural transitions of sodium channels.

Authors:  F Conti; W Stühmer
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Shu Xiao; Vitalij Novickij; Maura Casciola; Iurii Semenov; Uma Mangalanathan; Vitalii Kim; Christian Zemlin; Esin Sozer; Claudia Muratori; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 4.  Ion channel voltage sensors: structure, function, and pathophysiology.

Authors:  William A Catterall
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Nanosecond electric pulses: a novel stimulus for triggering Ca2+ influx into chromaffin cells via voltage-gated Ca2+ channels.

Authors:  Gale L Craviso; Sophie Choe; Paroma Chatterjee; Indira Chatterjee; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 5.046

6.  Diffuse, non-polar electropermeabilization and reduced propidium uptake distinguish the effect of nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Christian Zemlin; Olga N Pakhomova; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-06-22

7.  Cell stimulation and calcium mobilization by picosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Dongkoo Kang; Karl H Schoenbach; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.373

8.  Neuronal excitation and permeabilization by 200-ns pulsed electric field: An optical membrane potential study with FluoVolt dye.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Shu Xiao
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  Cardiac myocyte excitation by ultrashort high-field pulses.

Authors:  Sufen Wang; Jiexiao Chen; Meng-Tse Chen; P Thomas Vernier; Martin A Gundersen; Miguel Valderrábano
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Electroporation by subnanosecond pulses.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2016-05-03
View more
  6 in total

1.  Surgical Ablation of Cardiac Tissue with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields in Swine.

Authors:  Frency Varghese; Jonathan M Philpott; Johanna U Neuber; Barbara Hargrave; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.495

2.  Identification of electroporation sites in the complex lipid organization of the plasma membrane.

Authors:  Xinru Tang; Fangwei Zhao; Lea Rems; Sergio Pérez-Conesa; Ilaria Testa; Lucie Delemotte
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  5 ns electric pulses induce Ca2+-dependent exocytotic release of catecholamine from adrenal chromaffin cells.

Authors:  Josette Zaklit; Alex Cabrera; Aaron Shaw; Rita Aoun; P Thomas Vernier; Normand Leblanc; Gale L Craviso
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.760

4.  Nanosecond electric pulses are equally effective in electrochemotherapy with cisplatin as microsecond pulses.

Authors:  Angelika Vizintin; Stefan Markovic; Janez Scancar; Jerneja Kladnik; Iztok Turel; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Effects of high-frequency nanosecond pulses on prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Aleksander Kiełbik; Wojciech Szlasa; Vitalij Novickij; Anna Szewczyk; Magdalena Maciejewska; Jolanta Saczko; Julita Kulbacka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Electroporation and cell killing by milli- to nanosecond pulses and avoiding neuromuscular stimulation in cancer ablation.

Authors:  Emily Gudvangen; Vitalii Kim; Vitalij Novickij; Federico Battista; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.