Literature DB >> 32685917

Using Nanosecond Shocks for Cardiac Defibrillation.

Johanna U Neuber1,2, Frency Varghese3, Andrei G Pakhomov1, Christian W Zemlin1,2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review article is to summarize our current understanding of the efficacy and safety of cardiac defibrillation with nanosecond shocks. Experiments in isolated hearts, using optical mapping of the electrical activity, have demonstrated that nanosecond shocks can defibrillate with lower energies than conventional millisecond shocks. Single defibrillation strength nanosecond shocks do not cause obvious damage, but repeated stimulation leads to deterioration of the hearts. In isolated myocytes, nanosecond pulses can also stimulate at lower energies than at longer pulses and cause less electroporation (propidium uptake). The mechanism is likely electroporation of the plasma membrane. Repeated stimulation leads to distorted calcium gradients. Copyright 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arrhythmia; cardiac; defibrillation; nanosecond

Year:  2019        PMID: 32685917      PMCID: PMC7359641          DOI: 10.1089/bioe.2019.0030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectricity        ISSN: 2576-3105


  59 in total

1.  Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform.

Authors:  K A Mowrey; Y Cheng; P J Tchou; R Efimov
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Probing field-induced tissue polarization using transillumination fluorescent imaging.

Authors:  Bryan J Caldwell; Marcel Wellner; Bogdan G Mitrea; Arkady M Pertsov; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Near-infrared voltage-sensitive fluorescent dyes optimized for optical mapping in blood-perfused myocardium.

Authors:  Arvydas Matiukas; Bogdan G Mitrea; Maochun Qin; Arkady M Pertsov; Alexander G Shvedko; Mark D Warren; Alexey V Zaitsev; Joseph P Wuskell; Mei-de Wei; James Watras; Leslie M Loew
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Extracting intramural wavefront orientation from optical upstroke shapes in whole hearts.

Authors:  Christian W Zemlin; Olivier Bernus; Arvydas Matiukas; Christopher J Hyatt; Arkady M Pertsov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Effect of bystander CPR initiation prior to the emergency call on ROSC and 30day survival-An evaluation of 548 emergency calls.

Authors:  Søren Viereck; Thea Palsgaard Møller; Annette Kjær Ersbøll; Fredrik Folke; Freddy Lippert
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 6.  A shocking past: a walk through generations of defibrillation development.

Authors:  Sarah R Gutbrod; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Current is better than energy as predictor of success for biphasic defibrillatory shocks in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ristagno; Tao Yu; Weilun Quan; Gary Freeman; Yongqin Li
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  Restitution dynamics during pacing and arrhythmias in isolated pig hearts.

Authors:  Isabelle Banville; Nipon Chattipakorn; Richard A Gray
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-04

9.  Prolonged burst as a new method for cardioverter-defibrillator testing.

Authors:  Jan Lukl; Dan Marek; Alan Bulava; Marián Fedorco; Petr Schneiderka; Milos Táborsky; Jana Zapletalová
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Electrical restitution determined by epicardial contact mapping and surface electrocardiogram: its role in ventricular fibrillation inducibility in swine.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Dongdong Zhao; Bo Cui; Zhibing Lu; Jingjun Lü; Fang Chen; Minwei Bao
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.438

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.373

2.  Surgical Ablation of Cardiac Tissue with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields in Swine.

Authors:  Frency Varghese; Jonathan M Philpott; Johanna U Neuber; Barbara Hargrave; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.495

3.  Identification of electroporation sites in the complex lipid organization of the plasma membrane.

Authors:  Xinru Tang; Fangwei Zhao; Lea Rems; Sergio Pérez-Conesa; Ilaria Testa; Lucie Delemotte
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Electroporation safety factor of 300 nanosecond and 10 millisecond defibrillation in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts.

Authors:  Johanna U Neuber; Andrei G Pakhomov; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.