Literature DB >> 18839412

Plasma membrane permeabilization by 60- and 600-ns electric pulses is determined by the absorbed dose.

Bennett L Ibey1, Shu Xiao, Karl H Schoenbach, Michael R Murphy, Andrei G Pakhomov.   

Abstract

We explored how the effect of plasma membrane permeabilization by nanosecond-duration electric pulses (nsEP) depends on the physical characteristics of exposure. The resting membrane resistance (R(m)) and membrane potential (MP) were measured in cultured GH3 and CHO cells by conventional whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Intact cells were exposed to a single nsEP (60 or 600 ns duration, 0-22 kV/cm), followed by patch-clamp measurements after a 2-3 min delay. Consistent with earlier findings, nsEP caused long-lasting R(m) decrease, accompanied by the loss of MP. The threshold for these effects was about 6 kV/cm for 60 ns pulses, and about 1 kV/cm for 600 ns pulses. Further analysis established that it was neither pulse duration nor the E-field amplitude per se, but the absorbed dose that determined the magnitude of the biological effect. In other words, exposure to nsEP at either pulse duration caused equal effects if the absorbed doses were equal. The threshold absorbed dose to produce plasma membrane effects in either GH3 or CHO cells at either pulse duration was found to be at or below 10 mJ/g. Despite being determined by the dose, the nsEP effect clearly is not thermal, as the maximum heating at the threshold dose is less than 0.01 degrees C. The use of the absorbed dose as a universal exposure metric may help to compare and quantify nsEP sensitivity of different cell types and of cells in different physiological conditions. The absorbed dose may also prove to be a more useful metric than the incident E-field in determining safety limits for high peak, low average power EMF emissions. Copyright 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18839412      PMCID: PMC2632729          DOI: 10.1002/bem.20451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  19 in total

1.  Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses.

Authors:  K H Schoenbach; S J Beebe; E S Buescher
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  Potassium channel expression level is dependent on the proliferation state in the GH3 pituitary cell line.

Authors:  Antonny Czarnecki; Luce Dufy-Barbe; Sylvie Huet; Marie-Francoise Odessa; Laurence Bresson-Bepoldin
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.249

3.  Effects of high power microwave pulses on synaptic transmission and long term potentiation in hippocampus.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Joanne Doyle; Bruce E Stuck; Michael R Murphy
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.010

4.  Nanosecond, high-intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells.

Authors:  Stephen J Beebe; Paula M Fox; Laura J Rec; E Lauren K Willis; Karl H Schoenbach
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Nanoelectropulse-induced phosphatidylserine translocation.

Authors:  P Thomas Vernier; Yinghua Sun; Laura Marcu; Cheryl M Craft; Martin A Gundersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Energy-landscape-model analysis for irreversibility and its pulse-width dependence in cells subjected to a high-intensity ultrashort electric pulse.

Authors:  R P Joshi; Q Hu; K H Schoenbach; S J Beebe
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2004-05-04

7.  Stimulation of capacitative calcium entry in HL-60 cells by nanosecond pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  Jody A White; Peter F Blackmore; Karl H Schoenbach; Stephen J Beebe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Long-lasting plasma membrane permeabilization in mammalian cells by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF).

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Juergen F Kolb; Jody A White; Ravindra P Joshi; Shu Xiao; Karl H Schoenbach
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.010

9.  Differential effects in cells exposed to ultra-short, high intensity electric fields: cell survival, DNA damage, and cell cycle analysis.

Authors:  M Stacey; J Stickley; P Fox; V Statler; K Schoenbach; S J Beebe; S Buescher
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Calcium bursts induced by nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  P Thomas Vernier; Yinghua Sun; Laura Marcu; Sarah Salemi; Cheryl M Craft; Martin A Gundersen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 3.575

View more
  38 in total

1.  Optimization of gene delivery methods in Xenopus laevis kidney (A6) and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines for heterologous expression of Xenopus inner ear genes.

Authors:  Daniel Ramirez-Gordillo; Casilda Trujillo-Provencio; V Bleu Knight; Elba E Serrano
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  Plasma membrane permeabilization by trains of ultrashort electric pulses.

Authors:  Bennett L Ibey; Dustin G Mixon; Jason A Payne; Angela Bowman; Karl Sickendick; Gerald J Wilmink; W Patrick Roach; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.373

3.  Manipulation of cell volume and membrane pore comparison following single cell permeabilization with 60- and 600-ns electric pulses.

Authors:  Olena M Nesin; Olga N Pakhomova; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-12-20

4.  Cancellation of nerve excitation by the reversal of nanosecond stimulus polarity and its relevance to the gating time of sodium channels.

Authors:  Maura Casciola; Shu Xiao; Francesca Apollonio; Alessandra Paffi; Micaela Liberti; Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.373

6.  Visualization of Dynamic Sub-microsecond Changes in Membrane Potential.

Authors:  Hope T Beier; Caleb C Roth; Joel N Bixler; Anna V Sedelnikova; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Analysis of plasma membrane integrity by fluorescent detection of Tl(+) uptake.

Authors:  Angela M Bowman; Olena M Nesin; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Disassembly of actin structures by nanosecond pulsed electric field is a downstream effect of cell swelling.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Iurii Semenov; Marjorie A Kuipers; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.373

9.  Primary pathways of intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization by nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-12-05

10.  Electropermeabilization of endocytotic vesicles in B16 F1 mouse melanoma cells.

Authors:  Tina Batista Napotnik; Matej Rebersek; Tadej Kotnik; Eric Lebrasseur; Gonzalo Cabodevila; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.