Literature DB >> 31471916

Analysis of distance-based protein structure prediction by deep learning in CASP13.

Jinbo Xu1, Sheng Wang1.   

Abstract

This paper reports the CASP13 results of distance-based contact prediction, threading, and folding methods implemented in three RaptorX servers, which are built upon the powerful deep convolutional residual neural network (ResNet) method initiated by us for contact prediction in CASP12. On the 32 CASP13 FM (free-modeling) targets with a median multiple sequence alignment (MSA) depth of 36, RaptorX yielded the best contact prediction among 46 groups and almost the best 3D structure modeling among all server groups without time-consuming conformation sampling. In particular, RaptorX achieved top L/5, L/2, and L long-range contact precision of 70%, 58%, and 45%, respectively, and predicted correct folds (TMscore > 0.5) for 18 of 32 targets. Further, RaptorX predicted correct folds for all FM targets with >300 residues (T0950-D1, T0969-D1, and T1000-D2) and generated the best 3D models for T0950-D1 and T0969-D1 among all groups. This CASP13 test confirms our previous findings: (a) predicted distance is more useful than contacts for both template-based and free modeling; and (b) structure modeling may be improved by integrating template and coevolutionary information via deep learning. This paper will discuss progress we have made since CASP12, the strength and weakness of our methods, and why deep learning performed much better in CASP13.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coevolution analysis; critical assessment of structure prediction; deep convolutional residual neural network; multiple sequence alignment; protein contact and distance prediction; protein folding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31471916     DOI: 10.1002/prot.25810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  41 in total

Review 1.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Fold recognition by scoring protein maps using the congruence coefficient.

Authors:  Pietro Di Lena; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  High-accuracy protein structures by combining machine-learning with physics-based refinement.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-11-15

4.  Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning.

Authors:  Andrew W Senior; Richard Evans; John Jumper; James Kirkpatrick; Laurent Sifre; Tim Green; Chongli Qin; Augustin Žídek; Alexander W R Nelson; Alex Bridgland; Hugo Penedones; Stig Petersen; Karen Simonyan; Steve Crossan; Pushmeet Kohli; David T Jones; David Silver; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Assessing the accuracy of contact and distance predictions in CASP14.

Authors:  Victoria Ruiz-Serra; Camila Pontes; Edoardo Milanetti; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Rosalba Lepore; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-10-03

6.  DisCovER: distance- and orientation-based covariational threading for weakly homologous proteins.

Authors:  Sutanu Bhattacharya; Rahmatullah Roche; Bernard Moussad; Debswapna Bhattacharya
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-10-11

7.  Guardians of the Cell: State-of-the-Art of Membrane Proteins from a Computational Point-of-View.

Authors:  Nícia Rosário-Ferreira; Catarina Marques-Pereira; Raquel P Gouveia; Joana Mourão; Irina S Moreira
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

8.  Study of Real-Valued Distance Prediction for Protein Structure Prediction with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Jin Li; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Identification of Sub-Golgi protein localization by use of deep representation learning features.

Authors:  Zhibin Lv; Pingping Wang; Quan Zou; Qinghua Jiang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 10.  Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks.

Authors:  Julia Koehler Leman; Brian D Weitzner; Steven M Lewis; Jared Adolf-Bryfogle; Nawsad Alam; Rebecca F Alford; Melanie Aprahamian; David Baker; Kyle A Barlow; Patrick Barth; Benjamin Basanta; Brian J Bender; Kristin Blacklock; Jaume Bonet; Scott E Boyken; Phil Bradley; Chris Bystroff; Patrick Conway; Seth Cooper; Bruno E Correia; Brian Coventry; Rhiju Das; René M De Jong; Frank DiMaio; Lorna Dsilva; Roland Dunbrack; Alexander S Ford; Brandon Frenz; Darwin Y Fu; Caleb Geniesse; Lukasz Goldschmidt; Ragul Gowthaman; Jeffrey J Gray; Dominik Gront; Sharon Guffy; Scott Horowitz; Po-Ssu Huang; Thomas Huber; Tim M Jacobs; Jeliazko R Jeliazkov; David K Johnson; Kalli Kappel; John Karanicolas; Hamed Khakzad; Karen R Khar; Sagar D Khare; Firas Khatib; Alisa Khramushin; Indigo C King; Robert Kleffner; Brian Koepnick; Tanja Kortemme; Georg Kuenze; Brian Kuhlman; Daisuke Kuroda; Jason W Labonte; Jason K Lai; Gideon Lapidoth; Andrew Leaver-Fay; Steffen Lindert; Thomas Linsky; Nir London; Joseph H Lubin; Sergey Lyskov; Jack Maguire; Lars Malmström; Enrique Marcos; Orly Marcu; Nicholas A Marze; Jens Meiler; Rocco Moretti; Vikram Khipple Mulligan; Santrupti Nerli; Christoffer Norn; Shane Ó'Conchúir; Noah Ollikainen; Sergey Ovchinnikov; Michael S Pacella; Xingjie Pan; Hahnbeom Park; Ryan E Pavlovicz; Manasi Pethe; Brian G Pierce; Kala Bharath Pilla; Barak Raveh; P Douglas Renfrew; Shourya S Roy Burman; Aliza Rubenstein; Marion F Sauer; Andreas Scheck; William Schief; Ora Schueler-Furman; Yuval Sedan; Alexander M Sevy; Nikolaos G Sgourakis; Lei Shi; Justin B Siegel; Daniel-Adriano Silva; Shannon Smith; Yifan Song; Amelie Stein; Maria Szegedy; Frank D Teets; Summer B Thyme; Ray Yu-Ruei Wang; Andrew Watkins; Lior Zimmerman; Richard Bonneau
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.